Aortic compliance following EVAR and the influence of different endografts: Determination using dynamic MRA

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 406-414

  Van Herwaarden, Joost A ^a,b   Muhs, Bart E ^a   Vincken, Koen L ^a   Van Prehn, Joffrey ^a   Teutelink, Arno ^a   Bartels, Lambertus W ^a   Moll, Frans L ^a   Verhagen, Hence J M ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b ST ANTONIUS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Aortic compliance; Dynamic imaging; Dynamic MRA; Elastic modulus; Endovascular repair; Magnetic resonance imaging; Sac diameter; Stent graft; Stiffness

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ADULT; AGED; ARTERY COMPLIANCE; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; DEVICE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; ENDOLEAK; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STENT; YOUNG MODULUS;

AGED; ANGIOPLASTY; AORTA; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; COMPLIANCE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PULSATILE FLOW; STENTS;

EID: 33751199363     PISSN: 15266028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1583/06-1848.1     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Parodi JC, Palmaz JC, Barone HD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 1991;5:491-499.
2. Prinssen M, Verhoeven EL, Buth J, et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1607-1618.
3. Prinssen M, Buskens E, Blankensteijn JD on behalf of the DREAM trial participants. Quality of life after endovascular and open AAA repair. Results of a randomized trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27:121-127.
4. Baum RA, Carpenter JP, Cope C, et al. Aneurysm sac pressure measurements after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:32-41.
5. Marty B, Sanchez LA, Ohki T, et al. Endoleak after endovascular graft repair of experimental aortic aneurysms: does coil embolization with angiographic "seal" lower intra-aneurysmal pressure? J Vasc Surg. 1998;27:454-462.
6. Gawenda M, Jaschke G, Winter S, et al. Endotension as a result of pressure transmission over the graft following endovascular aneurysm repair - an in vitro study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003;26:501-505.
7. Sonesson B, Dias N, Malina M, et al. Intra-aneurysm pressure measurements in successfully excluded abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:733-738.
8. Milner R, Verhagen HJ, Prinssen M, et al. Non-invasive intrasac pressure measurement and the influence of type 2 and type 3 endoleaks in an animal model of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Vascular. 2004;12:99-105.
9. Dias NV, Ivancev K, Malina M, et al. Direct intra-aneurysm sac pressure measurement using tip-pressure sensors: in vivo and in vitro evaluation. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:711-716.
10. Milner R, Ruurda JP, Blankensteijn JD. Durability and validity of a remote, miniaturized pressure sensor in an animal model of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Endovasc Ther. 2004;11:372-377.
11. Malina M, Länne T, Ivancev K, et al. Reduced pulsatile wall motion of abdominal aortic aneurysms after endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg. 1998;27:624-631.
12. Sekhri AR, Lees WR, Adiseshiah M. Measurement of aortic compliance in abdominal aortic aneurysms before and after open and endoluminal repair: preliminary results. J Endovasc Ther. 2004;11:472-482.
13. Wilson KA, Hoskins PR, Lee AJ, et al. Ultrasonic measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall compliance: a reproducibility study. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:507-513.
14. Peterson LH, Jensen RE, Parnell J. Mechanical properties of aneurysms in vivo. Circ Res. 1960;8:622-639.
15. Hayashi K, Handa H, Nagasawa S, et al. Stiffness and elastic behavior of human intracranial and extracranial arteries. J Biomech. 1980;13:175-184.
16. van Herwaarden JA, Bartels, Muhs BE, et al. Dynamic magnetic resonance angiography of the aneurysm neck: conformational changes during the cardiac cycle with possible consequences for endograft sizing and future design. J Vasc Surg. 2006; in press.
17. Sonesson B, Lanne T, Vernersson E, et al. Sex difference in the mechanical properties of the abdominal aorta in human beings. J Vasc Surg. 1994;20:959-969.
18. van der Laan MJ, Bartels LW, Bakker CJG, et al. Suitability of 7 aortic stent-graft models for MRI-based surveillance. J Endovasc Ther. 2004;11:366-371.
19. Vos AW, Wisselink W, Marcus JT, et al. Aortic aneurysm pulsatile wall motion imaged by cine MRI: a tool to evaluate efficacy of endovascular aneurysm repair? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;23:158-161.
20. Faries PL, Agarwal G, Lookstein R, et al. Use of cine magnetic resonance angiography in quantifying aneurysm pulsatility associated with endoleak. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:652-656.
21. Wilson K, Whyman M, Hoskins P, et al. The relationship between abdominal aortic aneurysm wall compliance, maximum diameter and growth rate. Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;7:208-213.
22. Schurink GW, Aarts NJ, van Baalen JM, et al. Experimental study of the influence of endoleak size on pressure in the aneurysmal sac and the consequences of thrombosis. Br J Surg. 2000;87:71-78.
23. Fisher RK, Brennan JA, Gilling-Smith GL, et al. Continued sac expansion in the absence of a demonstrable endoleak is an indication for secondary intervention. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000;20:96-98.
24. Schurink GW, van Baalen JM, Visser MJT, et al. Thrombus within an aortic aneurysm does not reduce pressure on the aneurysmal wall. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:501-506.
25. Gelfand DV, White GD, Wilson SE. Clinical significance of type II endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg. 2006;20:69-74.