The ECETOC approach to targeted risk assessment; Lessons and experiences relevant to REACH

Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology

Volumn 17, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2007, Pages

  Money, Chris D ^a   Jacobi, Sylvia ^b   Penman, Mike G ^a   Rodriguez, Carlos ^c   De Rooij, Christ ^d   Veenstra, Gauke ^a  

^a EXXONMOBIL UPSTREAM RESEARCH COMPANY   (United States)

^b Albemarle Corporation   (United States)

^c PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY   (United States)

^d Procter and Gamble ^*

Author keywords

Exposure scenarios; REACH; Risk assessment; Targeting; User expectations

Indexed keywords

AWARENESS; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; LAW; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY;

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; EUROPEAN UNION; HUMANS; INTERNET; RISK ASSESSMENT; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 36949039938     PISSN: 15590631     EISSN: 1559064X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500565     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Barlow S.M., Kozianowsky G., Würtzen G., and Schlatter J. Threshold of toxicological concern for chemical substances present in diet. Food Chem Toxicol (2001): 39: 893-905.
2. Briggs D., and Crumbie N. Characteristics of People Working With Chemical Products in Small Firms, Health & Safety Executive Contract Research Report 278, HMSO, Norwich, (2000).
3. Brooke I.M. A UK Scheme to Help Small Firms Control Health Risks from Chemicals: Toxicological Considerations. Ann Occup Hyg (1998): 42: 377-390.
4. CIA. Safe Handling of Colourants 2. Chemical Industries Association, London, (1993).
5. Creely K.S., Tickner J., Soutar A.J., Hughson G.W., Pryde D.E., Warren N.D., Rae R., Money C., Phillips A ., and Cherrie J.W. Evaluation and further development of EASE model 2.0. Ann Occup Hyg (2005): 49: 135-145.
6. ECETOC. Targeted Risk Assessment, Technical Report No. 93, European Centre for the Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals, Brussels, (2004).
7. European Commission. White Paper on the Strategy for a Future Chemicals Policy. Document COM(2001)88, Brussels, (2001).
8. European Commission. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning the Registration. Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (Reach) Document (COM(03) 644 (01)), Brussels, (2003).
9. Guest I. The Chemical Industries Association Guidance on Allocating Occupational Exposure Bands. Ann Occup Hyg (1998): 42: 407-411.
10. HERA. Five yearsah ead of REACH. European Voice (2005): 11(13).
11. JRC. RIP 3.2-1 Scoping report. Technical Guidance Document on preparing the Chemical Safety Report under REACH - Scoping Study - Phase 1 A (REACH Implementation Project 3.2-1A) Service Contract Number 22551-2004-12 F1SC ISP BE, EU Joint Research Centre, Ispra, (2005).
12. Kroes R., Galli C., Munro I., Schilter B., Tran L-A., Walzer R., and Würtzen G. Threshold of toxicological concern for chemical substances present in the diet: a practical tool for assessing the need for toxicity testing. Food Chem Toxicol (2000): 34: 829-867.
13. Maidment S.C. Occupational hygiene considerations in the development of a structured approach to select chemical control strategies. Ann Occup Hyg Hygiene (1998): 42: 391-400.
14. McKee R.H., Medeiros A.M ., and Daughtrey W.C. A proposed methodology for setting occupational exposure limits for hydrocarbon solvents. J Occup Environ Hyg (2005): 2: 524-542.
15. Money C. European approaches in the development of approaches for the successful control of workplace health risks. Ann Occup Hyg (2003): 47: 533-540.
16. Money C., de Rooij C., Floch F., Jacobi S., Koundakjian P., Lanz S., Penman M., Rodriguez C., and Veenstra G. A structured approach to the evaluation of workplace health risks'. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety (2003): 2: 44-65.
17. Naumann B.D., Sargent E.V., Starkman B.S., Fraser W.J., Becker G.T., and Kirk G.D. Performance-based exposure control limits for pharmaceutical active ingredients. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J (1996): 57: 33-42.
18. O'Hara J., Williamson J., Benjamin K., Marlow P., White J., and Wright S. E-COSHH Essentials Guidance Sheets: User Consultation Exercise, Health and Safety Laboratory Report RAS/03/10, HSL, Sheffield., (2003).
19. Schneider T., Vermeulen R., Brouwer D., Cherrie J., Kromhout H., and Fogh C. A conceptual model for assessment of dermal exposure. Occup and Environ Med (1999): 56: 765-773.
20. Verdonck F.A.M., Boije G., Vandenberghe V., Comber M., de Wolf W., Feijtel T., Holt M., Koch V., Lecloux A., Sibel-Sauer A., and Vanrolleghem P.A. A rule-based screening environmental risk assessment tool derived from EUSES. Chemosphere (2005): 58: 1169-1176.