Engaging viewers through nonphotorealistic visualizations

NPAR Symposium on Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 93-102

  Tateosian, Laura G ^a   Healey, Christopher G ^a   Enns, James T ^b  

^a North Carolina State University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aesthetics; Mesh simplification; Nonphotorealistic rendering; NPR applications; Visualization; Voronoi diagrams

Indexed keywords

AESTHETICS; MESH SIMPLIFICATION; NONPHOTOREALISTIC RENDERING; NONPHOTOREALISTIC VISUALIZATIONS; VORONOI DIAGRAMS;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; DATA VISUALIZATION; SENSORY PERCEPTION;

IMAGE ANALYSIS;

EID: 36949027319     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1274871.1274886     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. BALTISSEN, R., AND OSTERMANN, B. 1998. Are the dimiensions underlying aesthetic and affective judgment the same? Empirical Studies of the A rts 16, 2, 97-113.
2. BARBER, C., DOBKIN, D., AND HUHDANPAA, H. 1993. The quickhull algorithm for convex hull. Tech. Rep. TR GCG53, The Geometry Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
3. BARBER, C., DOBKIN, D., AND HUHDANPAA, H. 1996. The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls. ACM Trans. Math. Soflw. 22, 4, 469-483.
4. BERLYNE, D. 1971. Aesthetics and Psychobiology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, NY.
5. BIRKHOFF, G. 1932. Aesthetic Measure. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. BROWN, KEVIN, Q. 1979. Voronoi diagrams from convex hulls. Information Processing Letters 9, 5, 223-228.
7. DAVIS, R. 1936. An evaluation and test of birkhoff's aesthetic measure and formula. Journal of General Psychology 15, 231-240.
8. GARLAND, M., AND HECKBERT, P. S. 1997. Surface simplification using quadric error metrics. In SIGGRAPH 97 Conference Proceedings, T. Whitted, Ed., 209-216.
9. GARLAND, M., AND HECKBERT, P. S. 1998. Simplifying surfaces with color and texture using quadric error metrics. In Proceedings Visualization '98, 263-269.
10. GARLAND, M. 1999. The Design, Use, and Required Facilities of an Interactive Visual Computer Simulation Language to Explore Production Planning Problems. Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg, PA.
11. GRIGORYAN, G., AND RHEINGANS, P. 2002. Probabilistic surfaces: Point based primitives to show uncertainty. In Proceedings Visualization 2002, 147-153.
12. HAEBERLI, P. 1990. Paint by numbers: Abstract image representations. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 90 Conference Proceedings) 24, 4, 207-214.
13. HEALEY, C. G., TATEOSIAN, L., ENNS, J. T., AND REMPLE, M. 2004. Perceptually based brush strokes for nonphotorealistic visualization. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 1, 64-96.
14. HERTZMANN, A. 1998. Painterly rendering with curved brush strokes of multiple sizes. In SIGGRAPH 98 Conference Proceedings, M. Cohen, Ed., 453-460.
15. HERTZMANN, A. 2002. Fast texture maps. In Proceedings NPAR 2002 Symposium on Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering, 91-96.
16. HOLMAN, D., VERTEGAAL, R., SOHN, C., AND CHENG, D. 2004. Attentive display: paintings as attentive user interfaces. In CHI '04: Extended abstracts of the 2004 conference on Human factors and computing systems, ACM Press, 1127-1130.
17. HSU, S. C., AND LEE, I. H. H. 1994. Drawing and animation using skeletal strokes. In SIGGRAPH 94 Conference Proceedings, A. Glassner, Ed., 109-118.
18. KIRBY, R. M., MARMANIS, H., AND LAIDLAW, D. H. 1999. Visualizing multivalued data from 2D incompressible flows using concepts from painting. In Proceedings Visualization '99, 333-340.
19. LAIDLAW, D. H., AHRENS, E. T., KREMERS, D., AVALOS, M. J., JACOBS, R. E., AND READHEAD, C. 1998. Visualizing diffusion tensor images of the mouse spinal cord. In Proceedings Visualization '98, 127-134.
20. LEWIS, J.-P. 1984. Texture synthesis for digital painting. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 84 Proceedings) 18, 3, 245-252.
21. LITWINOWICZ, P. 1997. Processing images and video for an impressionist effect. In SIGGRAPH 97 Conference Proceedings, T. Whitted, Ed., 407-414.
22. LU, A., MORRIS, C. J., EBERT, D. S., RHEINGANS, P., AND HANSEN, C. 2002. Non-photorealistic volume rendering using stippling techniques. In Proceedings Visualization 2002, 211-218.
23. MEIER, B. J. 1996. Painterly rendering for animation. In SIGGRAPH 96 Conference Proceedings, H. Rushmeier, Ed., 477-484.
24. PHAM, B. 1991. Expressive brush strokes. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing 53, 1, 1-6.
25. RAMACHANDRAN, V. 2000. The science of art: How the brain responds to beauty. In Understanding wisdom: Sources, science, and society., W. S. Brown, Ed. Templeton Foundation Press., Philadelphia, PA.
26. RHEINGANS, P., AND EBERT, D. 2001. Volume illustration: Nonphotorealistic rendering of volume models. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 7, 3, 253-264.
27. SALISBURY, M., ANDERSON, S. E., BARZEL, R., AND SALESIN, D. H. 1994. Interactive pen-and-ink illustrations. In SIGGRAPH 94 Conference Proceedings, A. S. Glassner, Ed., 101-108.
28. SALISBURY, M., WONG, M. T., HUGHES, J. F., AND SALESIN, D. H. 1997. Orientable textures for image-based pen-and-ink illustration. In SIGGRAPH 97 Conference Proceedings, T. Whitted, Ed., 401-406.
29. SECORD, A. 2002. Weighted voronoi stippling. In Proceedings NPAR 2002 Symposium on Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering, 37-43.
30. SHIRAISHI, M., AND YAMAGUCHI, Y. 2000. An algorithm for automatic painterly rendering based on local source image approximation. In Proceedings NPAR 2000 Symposium on NonPhotorealistic Animation and Rendering, 53-58.
31. STOMPEL, A., LUM, E., AND MA, K.-L. 2002. Feature-enhanced visualization of multidimensional, multivariate volume data using non-photorealistic rendering techniques. In 10th Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, 1-8.
32. STRASSMANN, S. 1986. Hairy brushes. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 86 Proceedings) 20, 4, 185-194.
33. TATEOSIAN, L. G. 2002. Nonphorealistic visualization of multidimensional datasets. Master's thesis, North Carolina State University.
34. WALTER, J. D., AND HEALEY, C. G. 2001. Attribute preserving dataset simplification. In VIS '01: Proceedings of the conference on Visualization '01, IEEE Computer Society, 113-120.
35. WILSON, B., AND MA, K.-L. 2004. Rendering complexity in computer-generated pen-and-ink illustrations. In NPAR '04: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on Non-photorealistic animation and rendering, ACM Press, 129-137.
36. WINKENBACH, G., AND SALESIN, D. H. 1994. Computergenerated pen-and-ink illustration. In SIGGRAPH 94 Conference Proceedings, A. Glassner, Ed., 91-100.
37. WINKENBACH, G., AND SALESIN, D. H. 1996. Rendering parametric surfaces in pen-and-ink. In SIGGRAPH 96 Conference Proceedings, H. Rushmeier, Ed., 469-476.
38. WOODING, D. 2002. Eye movements of large populations: Ii. deriving regions of interest, coverage, and similarity using fixation maps. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 34, 4, 518-528.