Software connector classification and selection for data-intensive systems

Proceedings - ICSE 2007 Workshops: Second International Workshop on Incorporating COTS Software into Software Systems: Tools and Techniques, IWICSS'07

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages

  Mattmann, Chris A ^a,b   Woollard, David ^a,b   Medvidovic, Nenad ^b   Mahjourian, Reza ^c  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b University of Southern California   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CONSTRAINT THEORY; DATA TRANSFER; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; METADATA;

DATA DISTRIBUTION; JAVA-BASED FRAMEWORK;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 36949021757     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IWICSS.2007.11     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. R. Allen and D. Garlan. A formal basis for architectural connection. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol, 6(3):213-249, 1997.
2. C. Alves, X. Franch, J. P. Carvallo, and A. Finkelstein. Using goals and quality models to support the matching analysis during cots selection. In ICCBSS, pages 146-156, 2005.
3. J. Bhuta, C. A. Mattmann, N. Medvidovic, and B. Boehm. A framework for the assessment and selection of software components and connectors in cots-based architectures. In WICSA, 2007.
4. W. Emmerich. Software engineering and middleware: a roadmap. In ICSE - Future of SE Track, pages 117-129, 2000.
5. D. Garlan, R. Allen, and J. Ockerbloom. Architectural mismatch or why it's hard to build systems out of existing parts. In ICSE, pages 179-185, 1995.
6. H. Kincaid, S. Kelly, D. J. Crichton, D. Johnsey, M. Winget, and S. Srivastava. A national virtual specimen database for early cancer detection. In CBMS, pages 117-123, 2003.
7. E. Mancebo and A. A. Andrews. A strategy for selecting multiple components. In SAC, pages 1505-1510, 2005.
8. C. Mattmann. Software connectors for highly distributed and voluminous data-intensive systems. Qualifying Exam Report USC-CSE-2006-602, Univ. of Southern California, 2006.
9. C. Mattmann, D. J. Crichton, N. Medvidovic, and S. Hughes. A software architecture-based framework for highly distributed and data intensive scientific applications. In ICSE, pages 721-730, 2006.
10. N. Medvidovic, E. M. Dashofy, and R. N. Taylor. The role of middleware in architecture-based software development. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 13(4):367-393, 2003.
11. N. Medvidovic and R. N. Taylor. A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages. IEEE Trans. Software Eng., 26(1):70-93, 2000.
12. N. R. Mehta, N. Medvidovic, and S. Phadke. Towards a taxonomy of software connectors. In ICSE, pages 178-187, 2000.
13. D. E. Perry and A. L. Wolf. Foundations for the study of software architecture. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 17(4):40-52, 1992.
14. M. Shaw. Procedure calls are the assembly language of software interconnection: Connectors deserve first-class status. In ICSE Workshop on Studies of Software Design, pages 17-32, 1993.
15. M. Shaw and D. Garlan. Software Architecture - Perspectives on an emerging discipline. Prentice Hall, 1996.
16. R. L. Winkler. An Introduction to Bayesian Inference and Decision. Probabilistic Press, 2003.
17. A. Zarras. A comparison framework for middleware infrastructures. Journal of Object Technology, 3(5):103-123, 2004.