A strategy for selecting multiple components

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

Volumn 2, Issue , 2005, Pages 1505-1510

  Mancebo, Ed ^a   Andrews, Anneliese ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Component selection; Component based software engineering; Multi criteria decision making; Software architecture

Indexed keywords

COMPONENT SELECTION; COMPONENT-BASED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 33644531886     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1066677.1067017     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. C. Alves and J. Castro. Cre: A systematic method for cots component selection. In Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil, October 2001.
2. L. Bass, P. Clements, and R. Kazman. Software Architecture in Practice. Addison-Wesley, 2001.
3. M. Bjorkander and C. Kobryn. Architecting systems with uml 2.0. IEEE Software, 20(4):57-61, July/August 2003.
4. B. W. Boehm. Software Engineering Economics. Prentice-Hall, 1981.
5. P. Bogetoft and P. Pruzan. Planning with Multiple Criteria. North-Holland, 1991.
6. P. Botella, X. Burgues, J. P. Carvallo, et al. Towards a quality model for the selection of erp systems. LNCS, 2693:225-245, 2003.
7. L. Brownsword, T. Oberndorf, and C. A. Sledge. Developing new processes for cots-based systems. IEEE Software, pages 48-55, July/August 2000.
8. D. Garlan, R. Allen, and J. Ockerbloom. Architectural mismatch: Or why it's hard to build systems out of existing parts. In Proc. Int'l Conf. Software Eng., pages 179-185, 1999.
9. G. T. Heineman and W. T. Councill. Component-Based Software Engineering: Putting the Pieces Together. Addison-Wesley, 2001.
10. L. Iribarne, J. M. Troya, and A. Vallencillo. A trading service for cots components. The Computer Journal, 47(3):342-357, May 2004.
11. R. Kazman, M. Klein, and P. Clements. Atam: Method for architecture evaluation. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2000-TR-004, CMU, August 2000.
12. J. Kontio. Otso: A systematic process for reusable software component selection. Technical Report CS-TR-3478, December 1995.
13. D. Kunda and L. Brooks. Applying social-technical approach for cots selection. In UKAIS Conference. University of York, April 1999.
14. A. Lozano-Tello and A. Gomez-Perez. Baremo: How to choose the appropriate software component using the analytical hierarchy process. In Proc. of the 14th Int'l Conf. on Software Eng. and Knowledge Eng., pages 781-788, 2002.
15. N. Medvidovic and R. N. Taylor. A classification and comparison framework for software architecture desription languages. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26(1):70-93, January 2000.
16. C. Ncube and N. Maiden. Pore: Procurement-oriented requirements engineering method for the component based systems engineering development paradigm. In Int'l Conf. Software Eng. CBSE Workshop, 1999.
17. B. Nuseibeh. Weaving together requirements and architectures. IEEE Computer, 34:115-117, 2001.
18. A. O'Fallon, O. Pilskalkns, A. Knight, and A. Andrews. Defining and qualifying components in the design phase. In Proc. of the 16th Int'l Conf. on Software Eng. and Knowledge Eng., June 2004.
19. T. L. Saaty. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, 1990.
20. S. Sedigh-Ali, A. Ghafoor, and R. A. Paul. A metrics-guided framework for cost and quality management of component-based software. LNCS, 2693:374-402, 2003.
21. M. Shaw. Architectural issues in software reuse: It's not just the functionality, it's the packaging. In Proc. of the 1995 Symposium on Software Reusability, pages 3-6, 1995.
22. C. Syzperski. Component Software: Beyond Object-Oriented Programming. Addison-Wesley, 1998.