Venture Capital's Role in Innovation: Issues, Research and Stakeholder Interests

The International Handbook on Innovation

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 641-663

  Callahan, John ^a   Muegge, Steven ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Innovation; Research; Venture capital

Indexed keywords

EID: 36949010407     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-008044198-6/50044-9     Document Type: Chapter

References (115)

1. Agarwal R., Gort M. First-mover advantage and the speed of competitive entry, 1887-1986. Journal of Law and Economics 2001, 44(1):161-177. April.
2. Amit R., Glosten G., Muller E. Does venture capital foster the most promising entrepreneurial firms?. California Management Review 1990, 102-111. Spring.
3. Athey S., Stern S. An empirical framework for testing theories about complementarity in organizational design. Working paper 1997, http://www.stanford.edu/~athey/testcomp0498.pdf.
4. Bailyn L. Research as cognitive process: Implications for data analysis. Quality and Quantity 1977, 11:97-117.
5. Baker M., Gompers P.A. Executive ownership and control in newly public firms: The role of venture capitalists. Harvard Business School 1999, working paper, November. http://www.people.hbs.edu/mbaker/cv/papers/Ownership.pdf.
6. Barry C., Muscarella C., Peavy J., Vetsuypens M. The role of venture capital in the creation of public companies: Evidence from the going public process. Journal of Financial Economics 1990, 27:447-471.
7. Bhidé A.V. Taking care: How mechanisms to control mistakes affect investment decisions. Columbia Business School 2002, Working paper, August. http://www.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/abhide/bhide_taking_care.pdf.
8. Bhidé A.V. The origins and evolution of new businesses 2000, Oxford University Press, New York.
9. Block Z., MacMillan I. Corporate venturing: Creating new businesses within the firm 1995, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
10. Bratton W.W. Venture capital on the downside: Preferred stock and corporate control. Michigan Law Review 2002, 100(5):891-945. March.
11. Burns T., Stalker G.M. The management of innovation 1994, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
12. Cable D.M., Shane S. A prisoner's dilemma approach to entrepreneur-venture capitalist relationships. Academy of Management Review 1997, 22(1):42-176.
13. Callahan J., Sharp J. Entrepreneurs and venture capitalists: differences in growth objectives 1985.
14. Chesbrough H. Making sense of corporate venture capital. Harvard Business Review 2002, March, 2002.
15. Chesbrough H. Designing corporate ventures in the shadow of private venture capital. California Management Review 2000, 31-49. Spring.
16. Chesbrough H., Rosenbloom R. The role of the business model in capturing value innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spinoff companies. Industrial and Corporate Change 2002, 11(3):529-555. June.
17. Chesbrough H., Smith E. Chasing economies of scope: Xerox's management of its technology spinoff organizations. Working paper 2000, http://www.people.hbs.edu/hchesbrough/spinoff.pdf.
18. Chesbrough H., Socolof S. Commercializing new ventures from Bell Labs Technology: The design and experience of Lucent's New Ventures Group. Research-Technology Management 2000, 1-11. March.
19. Christensen C. The innovator's dilemma 1997, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
20. Cumming D., MacIntosh J. Venture capital exits in Canada and the United States. Presented at the 2002 Babson Conference on Entrepreneurship 2002.
21. Davis K.S. Decision criteria in the evaluation of potential intrapreneurs. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 1999, 16(-4):295-327. September-December.
22. Dawson P. In at the deep end: Conducting processual research on organisational change. Scandinavian Journal of Management 1997, 13(4):389-405.
23. De Clercq D., Sapienza H.J. The creation of relational rents in venture capitalist-entrepreneur dyads. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance 2001, 3(2):107-127. April.
24. Devenow A., Welch I. Rational herding in financial economics. European Economic Review 1996, 40:603-615.
25. Dyer W.G., Wilkins A.L. etter stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: A rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Academy of Management Review 1991, 16(3):613-619.
26. Eisenhardt K.M. Better stories and better constructs: The case for rigor and comparative logic. Academy of Management Review 1989, 16(3):620-627.
27. Eisenhardt K.M. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 1989, 14:532-550.
28. Fast N. The rise and fall of corporate new venture divisions 1978, UMI Research Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
29. Fenn G.W., Liang N. New resources and new ideas: Private equity for small businesses. Journal of Banking and Finance 1998, 22(6-8):1077-1084. August.
30. Forlani D., Mullins J.W. Perceived risks and choices in entrepreneurs' new venture decisions. Journal of Business Venturing 2000, 15(4):305-322.
31. Freear J., Sohl J.E., Wetzel W.E. Angels: personal investors in the venture capital market. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 1995, 7:85-94.
32. Gabrielsson J., Huse M. The venture capitalist and the board of directors in SMEs: Roles and processes. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance 2002, 4(2):125-146. April.
33. Gans J., Stern S. When does funding small firms bear fruit? Evidence from the SBIR Program. MIT Sloan School of Management working paper 1999.
34. Gartner W.B., Birley S. Introduction to special issue on qualitative methods in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing 2002, 17(5):387-395.
35. Gifford S. Limited attention and the role of the venture capitalist. Journal of Business Venturing 1997, 12:459-482.
36. Giudici G., Paleari S. The optimal staging of venture capital financing when entrepreneurs extract private benefits from their firms. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies 2000, 1(2):153-174. May.
37. Gompers P.A. Ownership and control in entrepreneurial firms: An examination of convertible securities in venture capital investment. Harvard Business School working paper 1999.
38. Gompers P.A. Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital. Journal of Finance 1995, 50:1461-1490. December, (This article forms the basis for chapter 7 of Gompers and Lerner's The Venture Capital Cycle).
39. Gompers P.A., Brav A. 'Myth or reality?' The long-run underperformance of initial public offerings: Evidence from venture and nonventure capital-backed companies. Journal of Finance 1997, 1791-1821. December.
40. Gompers P., Lerner J. The venture capital revolution. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2001, 15:145-168.
41. Gompers P., Lerner J. The money of invention: How venture capital creates new wealth 2001, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
42. Gompers P., Lerner J. The venture capital cycle 1999, MIT Press, Boston, MA.
43. Gompers P.A., Lerner J. An analysis of compensation in the U.S. venture capital partnership. Journal of Financial 1999, 51:3-44. January, (This article forms the basis for chapter 4 of Gompers and Lerner's The Venture Capital Cycle.
44. Gompers P.A., Lerner J. The determinants of corporate venture capital success: Organizational structure, incentives, and complementarities. Concentrated Corporate Ownership 1999, University of Chicago Press. R. Morck (Ed.).
45. Gompers P.A., Lerner J. The use of covenants: An analysis of venture partnership agreements. Journal of Law and Economics 1996, 39:463-498. October.
46. Gorman P., Sahlman W.A. What do venture capitalists do?. Journal of Business Venturing 1989, 4:231-248.
47. Hall J., Hofer C.W. Venture capitalists decision criteria in new venture evaluation. Journal of Business Venturing 1993, 8(1):25-42. January.
48. Hart, O. Financial contracting. Journal of Economic Literature 2001, 39(4):1079-1100. December.
49. Hart O., Moore J. Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 1990, 98:1119-1158.
50. Hellman T., Puri M. The interaction between product market and financial strategy: The role of venture capital. Review of Financial Studies 2000, 959-984. Winter.
51. Hellman T., Puri M. Venture capital and the professionalization of start-up firms: Empirical evidence. Stanford Business School working paper 2000.
52. Henderson R., Clark K. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 1990, 35:9-30.
53. Hinings C.R. Reflections on processual research. Scandinavian Journal of Management 1997, 13(4):493-503.
54. Hsu D. Do venture capitalists affect the commercialization strategies at start-ups?. MIT Industrial Performance Center working paper 2000, June. http://www.globalization.mit.edu/globalization00-006.pdf.
55. Hunt B., Lerner J. Xerox technology ventures: March 1995. Harvard Business School case no. 9-295-127 1995, (and teaching note no. 9-298-152).
56. Hyland J. Using VC experience to create business value. From the Trenches: Strategies from Industry Leaders on the New E-conomy 2001, John Wiley, Chichester, U.K. E.J. Kelly (Ed.).
57. Jensen M.C., Meckling W.H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 1976, 3:305-360.
58. Jog V.M., Lawson W.M., Riding A.L. The venture capitalist entrepreneur interface: Expectations, conflicts and contracts. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship 1991, 8.
59. Kaplan J. Startup: A silicon valley adventure 1994, Penguin Press.
60. Kaplan S., Stromberg P. Financial contracting theory meets the real world: An empirical analysis of venture capital contracts 2002, working paper, University of Chicago Graduate School of Business.
61. Kaplan S., Stromberg P. Venture capitalists as principles: Contracting, screening, and monitoring. American Economic Review 2001, 91(2):426-430.
62. Kaplan S., Stromberg P. How do venture capitalists choose and manage their investments?. University of Chicago working paper 2000.
63. Kortum S., Lerner J. Assessing the contribution of venture capital to innovation. Rand Journal of Economics 2000, 31:674-692.
64. Leifer R., McDermott C., O'Connor G., Peters L., Rice M., Veryzer R. Radical innovation: How mature companies can outsmart upstarts 2001, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
65. Lerner J. Venture capitalists and the oversight of private firms. Journal of Finance 1995, 50:301-318. March, (This article forms the basis for chapter 8 of Gompers and Lerner's The Venture Capital Cycle).
66. Lerner J. The syndication of venture capital investments. Financial Management 1994, 23:16-27. Autumn, (This article forms the basis for chapter 9 of Gompers and Lerner's The Venture Capital Cycle.).
67. Lind E.A., Tyler T. The social psychology of procedural justice 1988, Plenum, New York.
68. MacMillan I., Kulow D., Khoylian R. Venture capitalist involvement in their investments: Extent and performance. Journal of Business Venturing 1989, 4:27-47.
69. MacMillan I.C., Siegel R., Narasimha P.N.S. Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals. Journal of Business Venturing 1985, 1(1):119-128.
70. Madill J.J., Haines G., Orser B.J., Riding A.L. Managing high technology SMEs to obtain institutional venture capital: A role for angels. Eric Sprott School of Business, Carleton University working paper, presented at the Babson Entrepreneurship Research Conference, June 2002.
71. Megginson W., Weiss K. Venture capital certification in initial public offerings. Journal of Finance 1991, 46:879-903.
72. Nesheim J.L. High tech start up 2000, The Free Press, New York.
73. O'Connor G.C., Maslyn W.T. Nortel Networks' Business Ventures Group. Babson College Case Study 102-C02 2002.
74. Pence C.C. How venture capitalists make investment decisions 1982, UMI Research Press.
75. Pettigrew A.M. What is processual analysis?. Scandinavian Journal of Management 1997, 13(4):337-348.
76. Poole M.S., Van De Ven A.H., Dooley K., Holmes M.E. Organizational change and innovation processes: Theory and methods for research 2000, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
77. Porter M.E. The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review 1990, March.
78. Powell W.W., Koput K.W., Bowie J.I., Smith-Doerr L. The spatial clustering of science and capital: Accounting for biotech firm-venture capital relationships. Regional Studies 2002, 36(3):291-305.
79. PricewaterhouseCoopers Global private equity 2002: A review of the global private equity and venture capital markets 2002, PricewaterhouseCoopers.
80. Rind K. The role of venture capital in corporate development. Strategic Management Journal 1981, 2:169-180.
81. Ruhnka J.C., Feldman H.D., Dean T.J. The living dead phenomenon in venture capital investments. Journal of Business Venturing 1992, 7(2):137-155.
82. The entrepreneurial venture 1999, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA. 2nd ed. S. W.A., S. H.H., R. M.J., B.--.--.--.--.--#.2.3.3.;. A. (Eds.).
83. Sahlman W.A. The structure and governance of venture capital organizations. Journal of Financial Economics 1990, 27:473-521.
84. Sahlman W.A. The horse race between capital and opportunity. The Venture Capital Review 1990, 17-25. Spring, (Reprinted in W. A. Sahlman et al., The Entrepreneurial Venture.).
85. Sapienza H., Korsgard M. The role of procedural justice in entrepreneur-venture capitalist relations. Academy of Management Journal 1996, 39:544-574.
86. Sapienza H.J. When do venture capitalists add value?. Journal of Business Venturing 1992, 7:9-27.
87. Saxenian A. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 1994, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
88. Schall M. A communication rules approach to organizational culture. Administrative Science Quarterly 1983, 28:557-581.
89. Schefczyk M., Gerpott T.J. Management support for portfolio companies of venture capital firms: An empirical study of German venture capital investments. British Journal of Management 2001, 12(3):201-216. September.
90. Schefczyk M., Gerpott T.J. Qualifications and turnover of managers and venture capital-financed firm performance: An empirical study of German venture capital-investments. Journal of Business Venturing 2001, 16(2):145-163. March.
91. Schumpeter J. The theory of economic development 1934, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
92. Shane S., Stuart T. Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science 2002, 48(1):154-170. January.
93. Shepherd D.A., Zacharakis A. The venture capitalist-entrepreneur relationship: Control, trust and confidence in co-operative behaviour. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance 2001, 3(2):129-149. April.
94. Shepherd D.A., Zacharakis A. Venture capitalists' expertise-A call for research into decision aids and cognitive feedback. Journal of Business Venturing 2002, 17(1):1-20. January.
95. Shepherd D.A., Ettenson R., Crouch A. New venture strategy and profitability: A venture capitalist's assessment. Journal of Business Venturing 2000, 15(5-6):449-467. September-November.
96. Siegel R., Siegel E., MacMillan I. Corporate venture capitalists: Autonomy obstacles and performance. Journal of Business Venturing 1988, 3(3):233-247.
97. Steier L., Greenwood R. Venture capitalist relationships in the deal structuring and post-investment stages of new firm creation. Journal of Management Studies 1995, 32(3):337-357. May.
98. Sweeting R.C. U.K. venture capital funds and the funding of new technology-based businesses: Process and relationships. Journal of Management Studies 1991, 28(6):601-622. November.
99. Sweeting R.C., Wong C.F. A U.K. 'hands-off' venture capital firm and the handling of post-investment investor-investee relationships. Journal of Management Studies 1997, 34(1):125-152. January.
100. Timmons J.A. New venture creation 2001, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York.
101. Timmons J., Bygrave W. Venture capital's role in financing innovation for economic growth. Journal of Business Venturing 1986, 1:161-176.
102. Tredennick N. An engineer's view of venture capitalists. IEEE Spectrum Online 2001, September. http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/WEBONLY/resource/sep01/speak.html.
103. Tushman M., Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organization environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 1986, 31:439-465.
104. Tushman M., O'Reilly C. Winning through innovation: A practical guide to leading organization change and renewal 1997, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
105. Tyebjee T.T., Bruno A.V. A model of venture capitalist investment activity. Management Science 1984, 30(9):1051-1066.
106. Utset M.A. Reciprocal fairness, strategic behavior & venture survival: A theory of venture capital-financed firms. Wisconsin Law Review 2002, (1):45-168.
107. von Burg U., Kenny M. Venture capital and the birth of the local area networking industry. Research Policy 2000, 29(9):1135-1155. December.
108. von Hippel E. Successful and failing internal corporate ventures: An empirical analysis. Industrial Marketing Management 1977, 6:163-174.
109. Wheelwright S.C., Clark K.B. Revolutionizing product development 1992, The Free Press, New York.
110. Woiceshyn J. Literary analysis as a metaphor in processual research: A story of technological change. Scandinavian Journal of Management 1997, 13(4):457-471.
111. Yin R.K., Campbell D.T. Case study research: Design and methods 2002, Sage Publications Inc.
112. Yost M. The state of corporate venturing: The number of active programs levels off as corporations complete shifts back to core businesses 1994, June 1994, Corporate Venturing.
113. Zacharakis A.L., Meyer G.D. The potential of actuarial decision models: Can they improve the venture capital investment decision?. Journal of Business Venturing 2000, 15(4):323-346. July.
114. Zacharakis A.L., Meyer G.D. A lack of insight: Do venture capitalists really understand their own decision process?. Journal of Business Venturing 1998, 13(1):57-76. January.
115. Zider B. How venture capital works. Harvard Business Review 1998.