On the pitfalls of UML 2 activity modeling

Proceedings - ICSE 2007 Workshops: International Workshop on Modeling in Software Engineering, MISE'07

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 8-13

  Schattkowsky, Tim ^a   Förster, Alexander ^b  

^a C LAB   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADERBORN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMBEDDED SYSTEMS; PETRI NETS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SEMANTICS; SYNTACTICS;

BUSINESS PROCESS MODELING; MODELING BEHAVIOR; SYNTACTIC PROBLEMS;

UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE;

EID: 36949003467     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/MISE.2007.12     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Bock, C: UML 2 Activity and Action Models: Object Nodes. Journal of Object Technology, Vol. 3 No. 1, 2004. [2] Bock, C.: UML Without Pictures, In IEEE Computer Special Issue on Model-driven Development, 2003.
2. Engels, G., Förster, A., Heckel, R., Thöne, S.: Process Modeling using UML. In M. Dumas; W. van der Aalst, A. ter Hofstede (eds.): Process-Aware Information Systems, Wiley Publishing, New York, 2005.
3. Eshuis, R.: Symbolic model checking of UML activity diagrams. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering Methodologlies Vol. 15, No. 1, 2006.
4. Eshuis, R., Wieringa, R.: A Real-Time Execution Semantics for UML Activity Diagrams. In Proc. FASE 2001, 2001.
5. Harel, D.: Statecharts: A visual formalism for complex systems. Science of Computer Programming, 1987.
6. Hoffman, W., Kirsch, J., Scheer, A.-W.: Modellierung mit ereignisgesteuerten Prozeßketten: Methodenhandbuch; Stand, Dezember 1992. In Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Wirtschaftsinformatik, no. 101, Universität des Saarlandes, 1992.
7. Object Management Group, The: Business Process Modeling Notation Specification. OMG dtc/06-02-01, 2006.
8. Object Management Group, The: OMG SysML Specification, OMG ptc/06-05-04, 2006.
9. Object Management Group, The: Unified Modeling Language: Superstructure. OMG ad/2005-07-04,2005.
10. Mellor, S.J., Balcer, M.J.: Executable UML - A Foundation for Model-Driven Architecture Addison-Wesley, 2002.
11. Petri, C.: Kommunikation mit Automaten. PhD thesis, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany, 1962.
12. Raistrick, C., Francis, P., Wright, J.: Model Driven Architecture with Executable UML. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
13. Schattkowsky, T., Engels, G., Förster, A.: A Model-Based Approach for Platform-Independent Binary Components with Precise Timing and Fine-Grained Concurrency. In Proc. HICSS 2007, 2007.
14. Schattkowsky, T., Hausmann, J. H., Engels, G.: Using UML Activities for System-on-Chip Design and Synthesis. In Proc. ACM/IEEE 9th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MoDELS 2006), LNCS, Springer, 2006.
15. Schattkowsky, T., Müller, W., Rettberg, A.: A Generic Model Execution Platform for the Design of Hardware and Software. In G. Martin, W. Müller (eds.): UML for SoC Design. Kluwer, 2005.
16. Störrle, H., Hausmann, J. H.: Towards a Formal Semantics of UML 2.0 Activities. In Proc. Software Engineering 2005, 2005.
17. Whiting, P. G., Pascoe, R. S. V.: A History of Data-Flow Languages. In IEEE Annals of the History of Computing archive, Volume 16 , pp. 38-59, 1994.