Generalization of map estimation in SAAM II: Validation against ADAPT II in a glucose model case study

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 961-968

  Callegari, Tiziano ^a   Caumo, Andrea ^b   Cobelli, Claudio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bayes estimation; Glucose kinetics; Maximum a posteriori estimation; Parameter estimation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; GLUCOSE; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; INSULIN; METABOLISM; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PHARMACOKINETICS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

FISHERIAN APPROACH; GLUCOSE KINETICS; INTRAVENOUS GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; MAXIMUM A POSTERIORI ESTIMATION; METABOLIC SYSTEM;

PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

GLUCOSE; INSULIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BLOOD; CHEMICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVALUATION; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; GLUCOSE INTOLERANCE; GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; HUMAN; INSULIN RESISTANCE; KINETICS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; VALIDATION STUDY;

ALGORITHMS; BAYES THEOREM; BLOOD GLUCOSE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GLUCOSE; GLUCOSE INTOLERANCE; GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; HUMANS; INSULIN; INSULIN RESISTANCE; KINETICS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS;

EID: 0036629474     PISSN: 00906964     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1114/1.1507328     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Anderson, R. L.; R. F. Hamman, P. J. Savage, M. F. Saad, A Laws, W. W. Kades, R. E. Sands, and W. Cefalu. Exploration of simple insulin sensitivity measures derived from frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance (FSIGT) tests. The insulin resistance atherosclerosis study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 142: 724-732, 1995.
2. Barrett, P. H. R., B. M. Bell, C. Cobelli, H. Golde, A. Schumitzky, P. Vicini, and D. M. Foster. SAAM II: Simulation, analysis, and modeling software for tracer and pharmacokinetic studies. Metabolism 47:484-492, 1998.
3. Bergman, R. N., Y. Z. Ider, C. R. Bowden, and C. Cobelli. Quantitative estimation of insulin sensitivity. Am. J. Physiol. 236:E667-E677, 1979.
4. Best, J. D., S. E. Kahn, M. Ader, R. M. Watanabe, T.-C. Ni, and R. N. Bergman. Role of glucose effectiveness in the determination of glucose tolerance. Diabetes Care 9:1018-1030, 1996.
5. Carson, E. R., C. Cobelli, and L. Finkelstein. The Mathematical Modeling of Metabolic and Endocrine Systems. New York: Wiley, 1983.
6. Cobelli, C., F. Bettini, A. Caumo, and M. J. Quon. Overestimation of minimal model glucose effectiveness in presence of insulin response is due to undermodeling. Am. J. Physiol. 275:E1031-E1036, 1998.
7. Cobelli, C., A. Caumo, and M. Omenetto. Minimal model SG overestimation and SI underestimation: Improved accuracy by a bayesian two-compartment model. Am. J. Physiol. 277:E481-E488, 1999.
8. D'Argenio, D., and A. Schumitzky. ADAPT II User's Guide: Parmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic System Analysis Software. Release 4. In: The Biomedical Simulation Resource. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California Press, 1997.
9. Finegood, D. T., and D. Tzur. Reduced glucose effectiveness associated with reduced insulin release: An artifact of the minimal model method. Am. J. Physiol. 271:E485-E495, 1996.
10. Johnson, R. A., and D. A. Wichern. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998.
11. Magni, P., R. Bellazzi, G. Sparacino, and C. Cobelli. Bayesian identification of a population compartmental model of c-peptide kinetics. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 28:812-823, 2000.
12. Quon, M. J., C. Cochran, S. Y. Taylor, and R. C. Eastman. Noninsulin-mediated glucose disappearance in subjects with IDDM. Discordance between experimental results and minimal model analysis. Diabetes 43:890-896, 1994.
13. Reaven, G. M. Banting lecture. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes 37:1595-1607, 1988.
14. Saad, M. F., R. L. Anderson, A. Laws, R. M. Watanabe, W. W. Kayes, Y. D. Chen Ida, R. E. Sands, D. Pei, P. J. Savage, and R. N. Bergman for the IRAS. A comparison between the minimal model and the glucose clamp in the assessment of insulin sensitivity across the spectrum of glucose tolerance. Diabetes 43:1114-1121, 1994.
15. SAAM II User Guide. Seattle, WA: SAAM Institute, 1997.
16. Sparacino, G., C. Tombolato, and C. Cobelli. Maximum-likelihood versus maximum a posteriori parameter estimation of physiological system models: The c-peptide impulse response case study. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 47:801-811, 2000.
17. Walter, E., and L. Pronzato. Identification of Parametric Models from Experimental Data. Paris: Springer, 1997.