Latinas with abnormal breast findings: Patient predictors of timely diagnostic resolution

Journal of Women's Health

Volumn 16, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 1468-1477

  Mojica, Cynthia M ^a   Bastani, Roshan ^a   Ponce, Ninez A ^b   Boscardin, W John ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BIVARIATE ANALYSIS; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH SURVEY; HISPANIC; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT REFERRAL; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALIFORNIA; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HISPANIC AMERICANS; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; POVERTY; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 36849036335     PISSN: 15409996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2006.0324     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Jacobellis J, Cutter G. Mammography screening and differences in stage of disease by race/ethnicity. Am J Public Health 2002;92:1144.
2. Abraido-Lanza AF, Chao MT, Gammon MD. Breast and cervical cancer screening among Latinas and non-Latina whites. Am J Public Health 2004;94:1393.
3. Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, Venet L, Roeser R. Tento fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 1982;69:349.
4. Tabar L, Fagerberg CJ, Gad A, et al. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1985;1:829.
5. Fletcher SW, Black W, Harris R, Rimer BK, Shapiro S. Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:1644.
6. White E, Urban N, Taylor V. Mammography utilization, public health impact, and cost-effectiveness in the United States. Annu Rev Public Health 1993;14:605.
7. Andersson I, Janzon L. Reduced breast cancer mortality in women under age 50: Updated results from the Malmo Mammographic Screening Program. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1997;22:63.
8. Richards MA, Westcombe AM, Love SB, Littlejohns P, Ramirez AJ. Influence of delay on survival in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review. Lancet 1999;353:1119.
9. Afzelius P, Zedeler K, Sommer H, Mouridsen HT, Blichert-Toft M. Patient's and doctor's delay in primary breast cancer. Prognostic implications. Acta Oncol 1994;33:345.
10. GIVIO. Reducing diagnostic delay in breast cancer. Possible therapeutic implications. GIVIO (Interdisciplinary Group for Cancer Care Evaluation) Italy. Cancer 1986;58:1756.
11. Kerner JF, Yedidia M, Padgett D, et al. Realizing the promise of breast cancer screening: Clinical follow-up after abnormal screening among black women. Prev Med 2003;37:92.
12. Mandelblatt JS, Yabroff KR, Kerner JF. Equitable access to cancer services: A review of barriers to quality care. Cancer 1999;86:2378.
13. Bastani R, Yabroff KR, Myers RE, Glenn B. Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening. Cancer 2004;101:1188.
14. Yabroff KR, Washington KS, Leader A, Neilson E, Mandelblatt J. Is the promise of cancer-screening programs being compromised? Quality of follow-up care after abnormal screening results. Med Care Res Rev 2003;60:294.
15. Rubino L, French WJ. Re-engineering the Los Angeles County public health care safety net: Recommendations from a Blue Ribbon Health Task Force. J Health Hum Serv Adm 2004;27:56.
16. Bastani R, Marcus A, Hollatz-Brown A. Screening mammography rates and barriers to use: A Los Angeles county survey. Prev Med 1991;20:350.
17. Bastani R, Maxwell A, Prabhu Das I, Yan S. Evaluation of an intervention to increase mammography screening in Los Angeles. Prev Med 1994;23:83.
18. Bastani R, Maxwell A, Carbonari J, Rozelle R, Baxter J, Vernon S. Breast cancer knowledge, beliefs, and behaviors of women in health versus non-health related occupations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1994;3:77.
19. Bastani R, Maxwell A, Bradford C. A tumor registry as a tool for recruiting a multiethnic sample of women at high risk for breast cancer. J Registry Manage 1996;23:74.
20. Bastani R, Maxwell A, Bradford C, Prabhu Das I, Yan K. Tailored risk notification for women with a family history of breast cancer. Prev Med 1999;29:355.
21. Curry S, Emmons K. Theoretical models for predicting and improving compliance with breast cancer screening. Ann Behav Med 1994;14:302.
22. DiMatteo R, Hays R, Gritz E, et al. Patient adherence to cancer control regimens: Scale development and initial validation. Psychol Assess 1993;5:102.
23. Royston P. Multiple imputation of missing values: Update. Stata J 2005;5:188.
24. Rubin D. Multiple imputation after 18+ years. J Am Stat Assoc 1996;91:473.
25. Barnard J, Rubin D. Small-sample degrees of freedom with multiple imputation. Biometrika 1999;86:948.
26. ACS. Breast cancer facts & figures 2005-2006. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc. 2005.
27. McCarthy BD, Yood MU, Boohaker EA, Ward RE, Rebner M, Johnson CC. Inadequate follow-up of abnormal mammograms. Am J Prev Med 1996;12:282.
28. Haas JS, Cook EF, Puopolo AL, Burstin HR, Brennan TA. Differences in the quality of care for women with an abnormal mammogram or breast complaint. J Gen Intern Med 2000;15:321.
29. Schettino MR, Hernandez-Valero MA, Moguel R, Hajek RA, Jones LA. Assessing breast cancer knowledge, beliefs, and misconceptions among Latinas in Houston, Texas. J Cancer Educ 2006;21:S42.
30. Koval AE, Riganti AA, Foley KL. CAPRELA (Cancer Prevention for Latinas): Findings of a pilot study in Winston-Salem, Forsyth County. NC Med J 2006;67:9.
31. Hubbell FA, Chavez LR, Mishra SI, Valdez RB. Differing beliefs about breast cancer among Latinas and Anglo women. West J Med 1996;164:405.
32. Carpenter V, Colwell B. Cancer knowledge, self-efficacy, and cancer screening behaviors among Mexican-American women. J Cancer Educ 1995;10:217.
33. Heszen-Klemens I, Lapinska E. Doctor-patient interaction, patients' health behavior and effects of treatment. Soc Sci Med 1984;19:9.
34. Rodriguez KL, Young AJ. Perspectives of elderly veterans regarding communication with medical providers about end-of-life care. J Palliat Med 2005;8:534.
35. Ashton CM, Haidet P, Paterniti DA, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of health services: Bias, preferences, or poor communication? J Gen Intern Med 2003;18:146.
36. Bartlett EE, Grayson M, Barker R, Levine DM, Golden A, Libber S. The effects of physician communications skills on patient satisfaction; recall, and adherence. J Chronic Dis 1984;37:755.
37. Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Can Med Assoc J 1995;152:1423.
38. AcademyHealth. Conference casts spotlight on patient adherence. AcademyHealth Reports. Washington, DC, AcademyHealth, 2004.
39. Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Gandek B, Rogers WH, Ware JE Jr. Characteristics of physicians with participatory decision-making styles. Ann Intern Med 1996;124:497.
40. Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE Jr. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care 1989;27:S110.
41. Orth JE, Stiles WB, Scherwitz L, Hennrikus D, Vallbona C. Patient exposition and provider explanation in routine interviews and hypertensive patients' blood pressure control. Health Psychol 1987;6:29.
42. Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Ware JE Jr., Yano EM, Frank HJ. Patients' participation in medical care: Effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. J Gen Intern Med 1988;3:448.
43. Poon EG, Haas JS, Louise Puopolo A, et al. Communication factors in the follow-up of abnormal mammograms. J Gen Intern Med 2004;19:316.
44. Willems S, De Maesschalck S, Deveugele M, Derese A, De Maeseneer J. Socioeconomic status of the patient and doctor-patient communication: Does it make a difference? Patient Educ Couns 2005;56:139.
45. Kaplan SH, Gandek B, Greenfield S, Rogers W, Ware JE. Patient and visit characteristics related to physicians' participatory decision-making style. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 1995;33:1176.
46. Cooper-Patrick L, Gallo JJ, Gonzales JJ, et al. Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA 1999;282:583.
47. Kerlikowske K. Timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1996;40:53.
48. Strzelczyk JJ, Dignan MB. Disparities in adherence to recommended follow-up on screening mammography: Interaction of sociodemographic factors. Ethn Dis 2002;12:77.
49. Yabroff KR, Breen N, Vernon SW, Meissner HI, Freedman AN, Ballard-Barbash R. What factors are associated with diagnostic follow-up after abnormal mammograms? Findings from a U.S. National Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:723.
50. Haas JS, Kaplan CP, Brawarsky P, Kerlikowske K. Evaluation and outcomes of women with a breast lump and a normal mammogram result. J Gen Intern Med 2005;20:692.
51. Schootman M, Myers-Geadelmann J, Fuortes L. Factors associated with adequacy of diagnostic workup after abnormal breast cancer screening results. J Am Board Fam Pract 2000;13:94.
52. Rojas M, Mandelblatt J, Cagney K, Kerner J, Freeman H. Barriers to follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms among low-income minority women. Cancer Control Center of Harlem. Ethn Health 1996;1:221.
53. Kaplan CP, Crane LA, Stewart S, Juarez-Reyes M. Factors affecting follow-up among low-income women with breast abnormalities. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2004;13:195.
54. Ramirez AJ, Westcombe AM, Burgess CC, Sutton S, Littlejohns P, Richards MA. Factors predicting delayed presentation of symptomatic breast cancer: A systematic review. Lancet 1999;353:1127.