Assessment of visual performance in the evaluation of new medical products

Drug Discovery Today: Technologies

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 55-61

  Drum, B ^a   Calogero, D ^a   Rorer, E ^a  

^a CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DRIVING ABILITY; GLARE; PERIPHERAL VISION; REVIEW; SIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; VISION TEST; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL DISORDER; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 36849018435     PISSN: 17406749     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ddtec.2007.10.009     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Higgins K.E., and Wood J.M. Predicting components of closed road driving performance from vision tests. Optom. Vis. Sci. 82 (2005) 647-656
2. Wood J.M., and Owens D.A. Standard measures of visual acuity do not predict drivers' recognition performance under day or night conditions. Optom. Vis. Sci. 82 (2005) 698-705
3. Featherstone K.A., et al. Driving simulation study: bilateral Array multifocal versus bilateral AMO monofocal intraocular lens. J. Cat. Refract. Surg. 25 (1999) 1254-1262
4. Ginsburg A. Contrast sensitivity and functional vision. In: Packer M., Fine I.H., and Hoffman R.S. (Eds). International Ophthalmic Clinics: Functional Vision (2003), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 5-15
5. Ginsburg, A. and Subraminan, S. (2006) Functional significant loss in night driving visibility distance associated with FACT contrast sensitivity. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting, April 30-May 4, 2006, Fort Lauderdale, FL USA (Abstract 06-A-3028-ARVO)
6. Report of Working Group 39 (1980) Recommended standard procedures for the clinical measurement and specification of visual acuity. Adv Ophthalmol 41, 103-148
7. Owsley C. Visual processing impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash among older adults. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 279 (1998) 1083-1088
8. Regan D., and Neima D. Low-contrast letter charts as a test of visual function. Ophthalmology 90 (1983) 1192-1200
9. Haegerstrom-Portnoy G., et al. The SKILL card - An acuity test of reduced luminance and contrast. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 36 (1997) 207-219
10. Pelli D.G. The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clin. Vis. Sci. 2 (1988) 187-199
11. Arditi A. Improving the design of the letter contrast sensitivity test. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 46 (2005) 2225-2229
12. Campbell F.W., and Green D.G. Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 181 (1965) 576-593
13. Ginsburg A.P. A new contrast sensitivity vision test chart. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 61 (1984) 403-407
14. Ginsburg A.P. Next generation contrast sensitivity testing. In: Rosenthal B., and Cole R. (Eds). Functional Assessment of Low Vision (1996), Mosby-Year Book, Inc. 77-88
15. Elliott D.B., and Bullimore M.A. Assessing the reliability, discriminative ability, and validity of disability glare tests. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 34 (1993) 108-119
16. Bailey I.L., and Bullimore M.A. A new test for the evaluation of disability glare. Optom. Vis. Sci. 68 (1991) 911-917
17. Higgins, K.E. and White, J.M. (1999) Transient adaptation at low light levels: effects of age. EPRI/LRO Fourth International Lighting Research Symposium. May, 1998, Orlando, FL (TR-110738, Proceedings, October, 1999)
18. van den Berg T.J.T.P., and IJspeert J.K. Clinical assessment of intraocular straylight. Appl. Opt. 31 (1992) 3694-3696
19. van den Berg, T.J.T.P. and IJspeert, J.K. (1991) The straylightmeter. in Technical Digest on Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System. Vol. 1, pp. 256-259, Optical Society of America
20. van Rijn L.J., et al. Measurement of stray light and glare; comparison of nyktotest, mesotest, stray light meter, and computer implemented stray light meter. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 89 (2005) 345-351
21. Johnson C.A., and Keltner J.L. Incidence of visual field loss in 20,000 eyes and its relationship to driving performance. Arch. Ophthalmol. 101 (1983) 371-375
22. Wood J.M., and Troutbeck R. Effect of restriction of the binocular visual field on driving performance. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 12 (1992) 291-298
23. Ball K., et al. Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes in older drivers. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 34 (1993) 3110-3123