"High performance" work practices, decentralization, and profitability: Evidence from panel data

Industrial and Corporate Change

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1037-1067

  Colombo, Massimo G ^a   Delmastro, Marco ^b   Rabbiosi, Larissa ^c  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^b AGCOM Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni   (Italy)

^c Copenhagen Business School ^*  (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; DECENTRALIZATION; ECONOMETRICS; INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE; PANEL DATA; PROFITABILITY;

EID: 36849001218     PISSN: 09606491     EISSN: 14643650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtm031     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Appelbaum, E., T. Bailey, P. Berg and A. Kalleberg (2000), Manufacturing Advantage: Why High Performance Work Systems Pay Off. Cornell University Press: Ithaca.
2. Arellano, M. and O. Bover (1995), 'Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models,' Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29-51.
3. Arthur, J. (1994), 'Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover,' Academy of Management Journal, 37 670-687.
4. Bailey, T. (1993), 'Organizational innovation in the apparel industry,' Industrial Relations, 32, 30-48.
5. Bartel, A. P. and F. R. Lichtenberg (1987), 'The comparative advantage of educated workers in implementing new technology,' Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, 1-11.
6. Batt, R. (1999), 'Work organization, technology, and performance in customer services and sales,' Industrial and Labor Relations Review 52, 539-564.
7. Bauer, T. K., (2003), 'Flexible workplace practices and labor productivity,' IZA Discussion paper N. 700.
8. Bauer, T. K., and Bender, S., (2002), 'Flexible work systems and the structure of wages: Evidence from matched employer-employee data,' IZA Discussion paper N. 353.
9. Berg, P., E. Appelbaum, T. Bailey and A. L. Kalleberg (1996), 'The performance effects of modular production in the apparel industry,' Industrial Relations, 35, 356-373.
10. Bertschek, I. and U. Kaiser (2004), 'Productivity effects of organizational change: Microeconometric evidence,' Management Science 50, 394-404.
11. Black, S. E. and L. M. Lynch (1996), 'Human capital investments and productivity,' American Economic Review, 86, 263-267.
12. Black, S. E. and L. M. Lynch (2001), 'How to compete: The impact of workplace practices and information technology on productivity,' Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 434-445.
13. Black, S. E. and L. M. Lynch (2004), 'What's driving the new economy: the benefits of workplace innovation,' Economic Journal, 114 F97-F116.
14. Blundell, R. and S. Bond (1998), 'Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models,' Journal of Econometrics 87, 115-43.
15. Boning, B., Ichniowski, C., and Shaw, K., (2001), 'Opportunity counts: Teams and the effectiveness of production incentives,' NBER Working Papers 8306.
16. Bresnahan, T. F., E. Brynjolfsson and L. M. Hitt (2002), 'Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: firm-level evidence,' The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 339-376.
17. Cappelli, P. and D. Neumark (2001), 'Do high-performance work practices improve establishment-level outcomes?,' Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54, 737-775.
18. Caroli, E. and J. Van Reenen (2001), 'Skill-biased organizational change? Evidence from a panel of British and French establishment,' The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 66, 1452-1492.
19. Child, J. (1972), 'Organization structure and strategies of control: A replication of the Aston study,' Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 163-176.
20. Colombo, M. G. and M. Delmastro (1999), 'Some stylized facts on organization and its evolution,' Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 40, 255-274.
21. Colombo, M. G. and M. Delmastro (2001), 'Technology use and plant closure,' Research Policy, 30, 21-34.
22. Colombo, M. G. and M. Delmastro (2002), 'The determinants of organizational change and structural inertia: Technological and organizational factors,' Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 11, 595-635.
23. Colombo, M. G. and M. Delmastro (2004), 'Delegation of authority in business organizations: An empirical test,' Journal of Industrial Economics, LII, 53-80.
24. Colombo, M. G. and M. Delmastro (forthcoming), The Economics of Organizational Design. Palgrave MacMillan.
25. Cristini, A., A. Gay, S. Labory and R. Leoni (2003), 'Flat hierarchical structure, bundles of new work practices, and firm performance,' Rivista Italiana degli Economisti, 313-341.
26. Delmastro, M. (2002), 'The determinants of the management hierarchy: evidence from Italian plants,' International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20, 119-137.
27. Doms, M., T. Dunne and K. Troske (1997), 'Workers, wages and technology,' The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 253-290.
28. Dosi, G. and B. Coriat (1998), 'Learning how to govern and learning how to solve problems: On the co-evolution of competences, conflicts and organizational routines,' in A. Chandler and P. Hagstrom (eds), The Dynamic Firm: The Role of Technology, Strategy, Organization, and Regions. Oxford University Press: Oxford, pp. 103-133.
29. Dosi, G., D. Levinthal and L. Marengo (2003), 'Bridging contested terrain: Linking incentive-based and learning perspectives on organizational evolution,' Industrial and Corporate Change, 12 413-436.
30. Dunlop, J. and D. Weil (1996), 'Diffusion and performance of modular production in the US apparel industry,' Industrial Relations, 35, 334-354.
31. Easton, G. S. and S. L. Jarrell (1998), 'The effects of total quality management on corporate performance: An empirical investigation,' The Journal of Business, 71, 253-307.
32. Geroski, P., S. Machin and J. Van Reenen (1993), 'The profitability of innovating firms,' RAND Journal of Economics, 24, 198-211.
33. Greenan, N. and D. Guellec (1998), 'Firm organization, technology and performance: An empirical study,' Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 6, 313-347.
34. Greenan, N. (2003), 'Organisational change, technology, employment and skills: An empirical study of French manufacturing,' Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27, 287-316.
35. Haskel, J. E. and Y. Heden (1999), 'Computers and the demand for skilled labour: Industry and establishment-level evidence for the UK,' Economic Journal, 109, C68-C79.
36. Hausman, J. B. (1978), 'Specification tests in econometrics,' Econometrica, 46, 1251-1271.
37. Hickson, D. J., D. S. Pugh and D. C. Pheysey (1969), 'Operations technology and organizational structure: An empirical reappraisal,' Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 378-397.
38. Holmstrom, B. and P. Milgrom (1994), 'The firm as an incentive system,' American Economic Review, 84, 972-991.
39. Huselid, M. A. (1995), 'The impact of human-resource-management-practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance,' Academy of Management Journal, 38, 635-672.
40. Huselid, M. A. and B. E. Becker (1996), 'Methodological issues in cross-sectional and panel estimates of the human resource-firm performance link,' Industrial Relations, 35, 400-422.
41. Ichniowski, C., (1990), 'Human resource management systems and the performance of US manufacturing business,' NBER Working Paper 3349.
42. Ichniowski, C., and Shaw, K., (1995), 'Old dogs and new tricks: determinants of the adoption of productivity-enhancing work practices,' Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, pp. 1-65.
43. Ichniowski, C. and K. Shaw (1999), 'The effects of human resource management systems on economic performance: An international comparison of US and Japanese plants,' Management Science, 45, 704-721.
44. Ichniowski, C. and K. Shaw (2003), 'Beyond incentive pay: Insiders' estimates of the value of complementary human resource management practices,' Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, 155-180.
45. Ichniowski, C., K. Shaw and G. Prennushi (1997), 'The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines,' American Economic Review, 87, 291-313.
46. ISTAT, (1999), Censimento Intermedio dell'Industria e dei Servizi. ( Intermediate census of manufacturing and services) ISTAT: Rome.
47. Janod, V. and A. Saint-Martin (2004), 'Measuring the impact of work reorganization on firms performance: Evidence from French manufacturing firms, 1995-1999,' Labour Economics, 11, 785-798.
48. Kandel, E. and E. Lazear (1992), 'Peer pressure and partnership,' Journal of Political Economy, 100, 801-817.
49. Kato, T. and M. Morishima (2002), 'The productivity effects of participatory employment practices: Evidence from new Japanese panel data,' Industrial Relations, 41, 487-520.
50. Kelley, M. R. (1994), 'Productivity and information technology,' Management Science, 40, 1406-1425.
51. Kelley, M. R. (1996), 'Participative bureaucracy and productivity in the machined products sector,' Industrial Relations, 35, 374-399.
52. Krafcik, J. F. (1988), 'Triumph of the lean production system,' Sloan Management Review, 30, 41-51.
53. Kwon, M. J. and P. Stoneman (1995), 'The impact of technology adoption on firm productivity,' Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 3, 219-233.
54. Laursen, K. and N. J. Foss (2003), 'New human resource managemenet practices, complementarities, and the impact on innovation performance,' Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27, 243-263.
55. MacDuffie, J. P. (1995), 'Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry,' Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48 196-218.
56. Marsh, R. M. and H. Mannari (1981), 'Technology and size as determinants of the organizational structure of Japanese factories,' Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 33-57.
57. Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts (1990), 'The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization,' American Economic Review, 80, 511-528.
58. Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts (1995), 'Complementarities and fit: Strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing,' Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19, 179-208.
59. Mookjerjee, D. (2006), 'Decentralization, hierarchies, and incentives: A mechanism design approach,' Journal of Economic Literature, 64 367-390.
60. Nickell, S., D. Nicolitsas and M. Patterson (2001), 'Does doing badly encourage management innovation?,' Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63, 5-28.
61. Osterman, P. (1994), 'How common is workplace transformation and who adopts it?,' Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 47, 173-188.
62. Osterman, P. (2000), 'Work reorganization in an era of restructuring: trends in diffusion and effects on employee welfare,' Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 53, 179-196.
63. Pini, P. and G. D. Santangelo (2005), 'Innovation types and labour organisational practices: A comparison of foreign and domestic firms in the Reggio Emilia district,' Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 14, 251-276.
64. Piva, M., E. Santarelli and M. Vivarelli (2006), 'Technological and organizational changes as determinants of the skill bias: Evidence from the Italian machinery industry,' Managerial and Decision Economics 27, 63-73.
65. Piva, M., E. Santarelli and M. Vivarelli (2005), 'The skill bias effect of technological and organisational change: Evidence and policy implications,' Research Policy, 34, 141-157.
66. Pugh, D. S., D. J. Hickson, C. R. Hinings and C. Turner (1968), 'Dimensions of organization structure,' Administrative Science Quarterly, 13, 65-105.
67. Pugh, D. S., D. J. Hickson, C. R. Hinings and C. Turner (1969), 'The context of organization structure,' Administrative Science Quarterly 14, 91-114.
68. Radner, R. (1992), 'Hierarchy: The economics of managing,' Journal of Economic Literature, 30, 1382-1415.
69. Rajan, R. and J. Wulf (2006), 'The flattening firm: Evidence from panel data on the changing nature of corporate hierarchies,' Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 759-773.
70. Ruigrok, W., A. Pettigrew, S. Peck and R. Whittington (1999), 'Corporate restructuring and new forms of organizing: Evidence from Europe,' Management International Review, 39, 41-64.
71. Siegel, D. S., D. A. Waldman and W. E. Youngdahl (1997), 'The adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies: Human resource management implications,' IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44 288-298.
72. Stoneman, P. and M. J. Kwon (1996), 'The impact of technology adoption on firm profitability,' Economic Journal, 107, 952-962.
73. Whittington, R., A. Pettigrew, S. Peck, E. Fenton and M. Conyon (1999), 'Change and complementarities in the new competitive landscape: A European panel study, 1992-1996,' Organization Science, 10, 583-600.
74. Womack, J., D. T. Jones and D. Ross (1990), The Machine that Changed the World. Macmillan: New York.