Auditory-visual contextual cuing effect

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 69, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1399-1408

  Kawahara, Jun Ichiro ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36749095049     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03192955     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. BRAINARD, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
2. BROCKMOLE, J. R., & HENDERSON, J. M. (2006). Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search. Visual Cognition, 13, 99-108.
3. BUCHTEL, H. A., & BUTTER, C. M. (1988). Spatial attentional shifts: Implications for the role of polysensory mechanisms. Neuropsychologia, 26, 499-509.
4. CHUA, K.-P., & CHUN, M. M. (2003). Implicit scene learning is view-point dependent. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 72-80.
5. CHUN, M. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 170-178.
6. CHUN, M. M., & JIANG, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.
7. CHUN, M. M., & JIANG, Y. (1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science, 10, 360-365.
8. CHUN, M. M., & JIANG, Y. (2003). Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 224-234.
9. CHUN, M. M., & PHELPS, E. A. (1999). Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 844-847.
10. EGETH, H. E., & YANTIS, S. (1997)- Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 269-297.
11. ENDO, N., & TAKEDA, Y. (2004). Selective learning of spatial configuration and object identity in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 293-302.
12. EYSENCK, M. W. (1979). Depth, distinctiveness, and elaboration. In L. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing: An approach to memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. FISER, J., & ASLIN, R. N. (2001). Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes. Psychological Science, 12, 499-504.
14. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1992). involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
15. HOWARD, J. H., HOWARD, D. V., DENNIS, N. A., YANKOVICH, H., & VAIDYA, C. J. (2004). Implicit spatial contextual learning in healthy aging. Neuropsychology, 18, 124-134.
16. JIANG, Y., & CHUN, M. M. (2001). Asymmetric object substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 895-918.
17. JIANG, Y., SONG, J.-H., & RIGAS, A. (2005). High-capacity spatial contextual memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 524-529.
18. KAWAHARA, J. (2003). Contextual cueing in 3-D layouts defined by binocular disparity. Visual Cognition, 10, 837-852.
19. KIM, M. S., & CAVE, K. R. (1999). Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: On the nature of the interference from a salient distractor. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1009-1023.
20. KUNAR, M. A., FLUSBERG, S., HOROWITZ, T. S., & WOLFE, J. M. (in press). Does contextual cueing guide the deployment of attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
21. MACKEBEN, M., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1993). Express attentional shifts. Vision Research, 33, 85-90.
22. MCDONALD, J. J., TEDER- SÄLEJÄRVI, W. A., & HILLYARD, S. (2000). Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception. Nature, 407, 906-908.
23. NABETA, T, ONO, F., & KAWAHARA, J. (2003). Transfer of spatial context from visual to haptic search. Perception, 32, 1352-1358.
24. OGAWA, H., TAKEDA, Y., & KUMADA, T. (2007). Probing attentional modulation of contextual cueing. Visual Cognition, 15, 276-289.
25. OLSON, I. R., & CHUN, M. M. (2001). Temporal contextual cueing of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1299-1313.
26. ONO, F., JIANG, Y., & KAWAHARA, J. (2005). Inter-trial contextual cueing: Association across successive visual search trials guides spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 703-712.
27. PELLI, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
28. SAFFRAN, J. R., NEWPORT, E. L., ASLIN, R. N., TUNICK, R. A., & BARRUECO, S. (1997). Incidental language learning: Listening (and learning) out of the corner of your ear. Psychological Science, 8, 101-105.
29. SCHACTER, D. L., & BUCKNER, R. L. (1998). On the relations among priming, conscious recollection, and intentional retrieval: Evidence from neuroimaging research. Neurobiology of Learning & Memory, 70, 284-303.
30. SPENCE, C., & DRIVER, J. (1997). Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1-22.
31. WARD, L. M., MCDONALD, J. J., & GOLESTANI, N. (1998). Cross-modal control of attention shifts. In R. D. Wright (Ed.), Visual attention (pp. 232-268). New York: Oxford University Press.
32. WOLFE, J. M. (1997). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 13-73). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
33. WOLTERS, G., & VERDUIN, C. J. (1982). Retention performance as a function of the distinctiveness of memory traces and retention task. Psychological Research, 44, 257-267.