Internal feature saliency as a marker of familiarity and configural processing

Visual Cognition

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 23-43

  Osborne, Cara D ^a   Stevenage, Sarah V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FACIES; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VOLUNTEER;

EID: 36749088955     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280701238073     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bartlett, J. C. and Searcy, J. H. (1993) Inversion and configuration of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 25, pp. 281-316.
2. Bonner, L., Burton, A. M. and Bruce, V. (2003) Getting to know you: How we learn new faces. Visual Cognition, 10:5, pp. 527-536.
3. Bruce, V. (1986) Influences of familiarity on the processing of faces. Perception, 15, pp. 387-397.
4. Campbell, R., Coleman, M., Walker, J., Benson, P. J., Wallace, S., Michelotti, J. and Baron-Cohen, S. (1999) When does the inner-face advantage in familiar face recognition occur and why?. Visual Cognition, 6:2, pp. 197-216.
5. Clutterbuck, R. and Johnston, R. A. (2002) Exploring levels of face familiarity using an indirect face-matching measure. Perception, 31:8, pp. 985-994.
6. Clutterbuck, R. and Johnston, R. A. (2004) Matching as an index of face familiarity. Visual Cognition, 11, pp. 857-869.
7. Clutterbuck, R. and Johnston, R. A. (2005) Demonstrating how unfamiliar faces become familiar using a face matching task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, pp. 97-116.
8. Ellis, H. D., Shepherd, J. W. and Davies, G. M. (1979) Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: Some implications for theories of face recognition. Perception, 8, pp. 431-439.
9. Freire, A., Lee, K. and Symons, L. A. (2000) The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence. Perception, 29, pp. 159-170.
10. Hosie, J. A., Ellis, H. D. and Haig, N. D. (1988) The effect of feature displacement on the perception of well-known faces. Perception, 17, pp. 461-474.
11. Leder, H. and Bruce, V. (1998) Local and relational aspects of face distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, pp. 449-473.
12. Moscovitch, M. and Moscovitch, D. A. (2000) Super face-inversion effects for isolated internal and external features, and for fractured faces. Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, pp. 555-604.
13. Nachson, I., Moscovitch, M. and Umilta, C. (1995) Contribution of external and internal features to the recognition of unfamiliar faces. Psychological Research, 58, pp. 31-37.
14. Phillips, R. J. (1979) Some exploratory experiments on memory for photographs of faces. Acta Psychologica, 43, pp. 39-45.
15. Searcy, J. H. and Bartlett, J. C. (1996) Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22:4, pp. 904-915.
16. Solina, F., Peer, P., Batagelj, B., Juvan, S. and Kovac, J. (2003) Colour-based face detection in the "15 seconds of fame" art installation. Proceedings of Mirage, INRIA Rocquencourt, France, pp. 38-47.
17. Stacey, P. C., Walker, S. and Underwood, J. (2005) Face processing and familiarity: Evidence from eye-movement data. British Journal of Psychology, 96, pp. 407-422.
18. Tong, F. and Nakayama, K. (1999) Robust representations for faces: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25:4, pp. 1016-1035.
19. Young, A. W., Hay, D. C., McWeeny, K. H., Flude, B. M. and Ellis, A. W. (1985) Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features. Perception, 14, pp. 737-746.
20. Young, A. W., McWeeny, K. H., Ellis, A. W. and Hay, D. C. (1986) Naming and categorising faces and written names. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, pp. 297-318.