Anonymity and openness and the recruitment of gamete donors. Part 2: Oocyte donors

Human Fertility

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 223-231

  Daniels, Ken ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Anonymity; Gamete donation; Oocyte donors; Openness; Recruitment

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ALTRUISM; CAUCASIAN; CONFIDENTIALITY; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE INFERTILITY; GAMETE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; IDENTITY; LAW; LIVING DONOR; MALE INFERTILITY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OOCYTE; PATIENT INFORMATION; PROGENY; RECIPIENT; RELATIVE; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; REVIEW; SEXUALITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL STATUS; SPERM DONOR;

CONFIDENTIALITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; OOCYTE DONATION;

EID: 36749075627     PISSN: 14647273     EISSN: 17428149     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14647270701624792     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Adams, J., Pease, E. and Lieberman, B. (2006) Donor recruitment: Change attitudes, not the law. Bio-News
2. Baetens, P., Devroey, P., Camus, M., Van Steirteghem, A. C. and Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, I. (2000) Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: The decision to use either known or anonymous oocytes. Human Reproduction, 15, pp. 476-484.
3. Braverman, A. and Corson, S. (2002) A comparison of oocyte donors' and gestational carriers/surrogates' attitudes towards third party reproduction. Journal of Assisted Reproduction & Genetics, 19, pp. 462-469.
4. Byrd, L., Sidebotham, M. and Lieberman, B. (2002) Egg donation - the donor's view: An aid to recruitment. Human Fertility, 5, pp. 175-182.
5. Cook, R. and Golombok, S. (1995) A survey of semen donation: Phase II - the view of the donors. Human Reproduction, 10, pp. 951-959.
6. Craft, I. (2005) Will removal of anonymity influence the recruitment of egg donors? A survey of past donors and recipients. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 10, pp. 325-329.
7. Daniels, K. (2004) Building a family with the assistance of donor insemination., Dunmore Press, Palmerston North
8. Daniels, K. (2004) From secrecy and shame to openness and acceptance. Third party assisted conception across cultures, pp. 148-167. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London
9. Daniels, K. (2007) Anonymity and openness and the recruitment of gamete donors. Part 1: Semen donors. Human Fertility, 10, pp. 151-158.
10. Daniels, K. and Taylor, K. (1993) Secrecy and openness in donor insemination. Politics & the Life Sciences, 12, pp. 155-170.
11. Daniels, K. and Hall, D. (1997) Semen donor recruitment strategies - a non-payment approach. Human Reproduction, 12, pp. 2330-2335.
12. Feyles, V., Daniels, K., Hasse, J., Isacsson, D., Newton, C., Nisker, J., Parker, J. and Tekpetey, F. (2004) Altruistic gamete donation. Phase I.
13. Fortescue, E. (2003) Gamete donation - Where is the evidence that there are benefits in removing the anonymity of donors? A patient's viewpoint. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 7, pp. 139-144.
14. Haimes, E. (1993) Issues of gender in gamete donation. Social Science & Medicine, 36, pp. 85-93.
15. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) (2004) Disclosure of donor information regulations 2004 SI 2004 No 1511., HFEA, London
16. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) (2004) Sperm, egg and embryo donation (SEED) review., HFEA, London
17. Johnson, M. (2004) Plea for egg and sperm donors. BBC News
18. Jordan, C., Belar, C. and Williams, R. (2004) Anonymous oocyte donation: A follow-up analysis of donors' experiences. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 25, pp. 145-151.
19. Kalfoglou, A. and Geller, G. (2000) A follow-up study with oocyte donors exploring their experiences, knowledge, and attitudes about the use of their oocytes and the outcome of the donation. Fertility & Sterility, 74, pp. 660-667.
20. Kalfoglou, A. and Gittlesohn, J. (2000) A qualitative follow up study of women's experiences with oocyte donation. Human Reproduction, 15, pp. 798-805.
21. Kirkman, M. (2003) Egg and embryo donation and the meaning of motherhood. Women & Health, 38, pp. 1-18.
22. Klock, S., Stout, J. and Davidson, M. (2003) Psychological characteristics and factors related to willingness to donate again among anonymous oocyte donors. Fertility & Sterility, 79, pp. 1312-1316.
23. New Zealand Government (2004) Human Assisted Reproductive Technology Act., Government Printer, Wellington
24. Patrick, M., Smith, A., Meyer, W. and Bashford, R. (2001) Anonymous oocyte donation: A follow-up questionnaire. Fertility & Sterility, 75, pp. 1034-1036.
25. Purewal, S. and Akker, O. van den (2006) British women's attitudes towards oocyte donation: Ethnic differences and altruism. Patient Education & Counselling, 64, pp. 43-49.
26. Raymond, J. (1990) Reproductive gifts and gift giving: The altruistic woman. Hastings Centre Report, 20, pp. 7-12.
27. Sauer, M. (2006) Oocyte and embryo donation 2006: Reviewing two decades of innovation and controversy. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 12, pp. 153-162.
28. Svanberg, A. Skoog, Lampic, C., Bergh, T. and Lundkvist, O. (2003) Characteristics of potential oocyte donors in Sweden. Human Reproduction, 18, pp. 2205-2215.
29. Svanberg, A. Skoog, Lampic, C., Bergh, T. and Lundkvist, O. (2003) Public opinion regarding oocyte donation in Sweden. Human Reproduction, 18, pp. 1107-1114.
30. Sweden (1984) Swedish law on artificial insemination. 1140/1984, Swedish Parliament
31. Warren, N. and Blood, J. (2003) Who donates? Why donate? An exploration of the characteristics and motivations of known egg donors: The Victoria, Australia experience. Journal of Fertility Counselling, 10, pp. 20-23.
32. Winter, A. and Daniluk, J. (2004) A gift from the heart: The experiences of women whose egg donations helped their sisters become mothers. Journal of Counseling & Development, 82, pp. 483-495.