Semen donor recruitment strategies - A non-payment based approach

Human Reproduction

Volumn 12, Issue 10, 1997, Pages 2330-2335

  Daniels, Ken R ^a   Hall, Darel J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Donor insemination; Payment; Recruitment; Semen donors; Social marketing

Indexed keywords

ALTRUISM; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; DONOR; FEE; MOTIVATION; REVIEW; SPERM;

EID: 0030732671     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/12.10.2330     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Barratt, C.L.R. (1993) Donor recruitment, selection and screening. In Barratt, C.L.R. and Cooke, I.D. (eds), Donor Insemination. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
2. Blood, J. (1992) Survey of Sperm Donor attitudes to the Central Register. Abstract of Presentation at the Xlth Annual Scientific Meeting of the Fertility Society of Australia, Adelaide, December 2-5, 1992.
3. Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society (1996) Response to Bill C-47: Human Reproductive and Genetic Technologies Act. A submission to the Canadian Government.
4. Canadian Government (1996) Bill C-47: Human Reproductive and Genetic Technologies Act.
5. Cheal, D. (1988) The Gift Economy, Routledge, London.
6. Cook, R. and Golombok, S. (1995) A survey of semen donation: phase II -the view of the donors. Hum. Reprod., 10, 951-959.
7. Daniels, K.R. (1987) Semen donors in New Zealand: their characteristics and attitudes. Clin. Reprod. Fertil., 5, 177-190.
8. Daniels, K.R. (1989) Semen donors: Their motivations and attitudes to their offspring. J. Reprod. Infant Psychol., 7, 121-127.
9. Daniels, K.R. and Taylor, K. (1993) Secrecy and openness in donor insemination. Politics Life Sci., 12, 155-170.
10. Daniels, K.R. and Lewis, G.M. (1996) Donor Insemination: The gifting and selling of semen. Social Sci. Med., 42, 1521-1536.
11. Daniels, K.R. and Haimes, E. (eds) (1997) International Social Science Perspectives on Donor Insemination. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (in press).
12. Daniels, K.R., Curson, R. and Lewis, G.M. (1996a) Semen donor recruitment: a study of donors in two clinics. Hum. Reprod., 11, 746-751.
13. Daniels, K.R., Curson, R. and Lewis, G.M. (1996b) Families formed as a result of donor insemination: The views of the semen donors. Child Fam. Social Work, 1, 97-106.
14. Daniels, K.R., Ericsson, H.-L. and Burn, I.P. (1996c) Families and donor insemination: the views of semen donors. Scand. J. Social Welfare, 5, 1-9.
15. Daniels, K.R., Lewis, G.M. and Curson, R. (1997) Information sharing in semen donation: The views of the donors. Soc. Sci. Med., 44, 673-680.
16. Editorial (1979) Artificial insemination for all? Br. Med. J., 2, 458.
17. Frederiksen, L.W., Solomon, L.J. and Brehony, K.A. (eds) (1984) Marketing Health Behavior: Principles, Techniques, and Applications. Plenum Press, New York.
18. Golombok, S. and Cook, R. (1994) A survey of semen donation: phase 1 -the view of UK licensed centres. Hum. Reprod., 9, 882-888.
19. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (1996) Fifth Annual Report. London.
20. Jarillo, J.C. and Stevenson, H.H. (1991) Co-operative strategies: the pay-offs and the pitfalls. Long Range Planning, 24, 64-70.
21. Kotler, P. (1986) Principles of Marketing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
22. Kotler, P. and Roberto, E.L. (1989) Social Marketing: Strategies for Changing Public Behaviour. Macmillan, New York.
23. Kovacs, G.T., Clayton, C.E. and McGowan, I. (1983) The attitudes of semen donors, Clin. Reprod. Fertil., 2, 397-399.
24. Le Lannou, D. and Lansac, J. (1993) Artificial procreation with frozen donor semen: the French experience of CECOS In Barratt, C.L.R. and Cooke, I.D. (eds). Donor Insemination. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 152-169.
25. Lansac, J. and Le Lannou, D. (1994) Sperm Donation and Practice of AID in France. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet., II, 231-236.
26. Lui. S.C. and Weaver, S.M. (1996) Attitudes and motives of semen donors and non-donors. Hum. Reprod., 11, 2061-2066.
27. Lui, S.C., Weaver, S.M., Robinson, J. et al. (1995) A survey of semen donor attitudes. Hum. Reprod., 10, 234-238.
28. Mahlstedt, P.P. and Probasco, K.A. (1991) Sperm donors: their attitudes toward providing medical and psychological information for recipient couples and donor offspring. Fertil. Steril., 56, 747-753.
29. Maslow, A.H. (1954) Motivation and Personality. Harper and Brothers, New York.
30. New Zealand Blood Transfusion Trust (1996) New Zealand Blood Transfusion Services Annual Statistics 1.7.95-30.6.96.
31. New Zealand Department of Justice (1985) New Birth Technologies: A Summary of Submissions Received on the Issues Paper. Government Printer, Wellington, New Zealand.
32. Nicholas, M.K. and Tyler, J.P.P. (1983) Characteristics, attitudes and personalities of A.I. donors. Clin. Reprod. Fertil., 2, 389-396.
33. Novaes, S.B. (1989) Giving, receiving, paying: gamete donors and donor policies in reproductive medicine. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care, 5, 352-355.
34. Purdie, A., Peek, J.C., Irwin, R. et al. (1992) Identifiable semen donors -attitudes of donors and recipient couples. NZ Med. J., Feb, 27-28.
35. Purdie, A., Peek, J.C., Adair, V. et al. (1994) Attitudes of parents with young children to sperm donation-implications for donor recruitment. Hum. Reprod., 1355-1358.
36. ReproMed Limited (1996) Response to Health Minister David Dingwall's moratorium to ban the sale of human sperm. Company news release.
37. Rowland, R. (1984) Attitudes and opinions of donors on an artificial insemination by donor (AID) programme. Clin. Reprod. Fertil., 2, 249-259.
38. Shenfield, F. and Steele, S.J. (1997) What are the effects of anonymity and secrecy on the welfare of the child in gamete donation? Hum. Reprod., 12, 392-395.
39. World Health Organization (1986) The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion, 1(4), iii.