Coronary stenting: Why size matters

Heart

Volumn 93, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 1500-1501

  De Benedetti, Edoardo ^a   Urban, Philip ^a  

^a LA TOUR HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY STENT; DRUG ELUTING STENT; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; HYPERPLASIA; INTIMA; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESTENOSIS;

CORONARY DISEASE; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; STENTS;

EID: 36749058997     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2006.113860     Document Type: Editorial

References (17)

1. Mintz GS. Mechanisms, prevention, and treatment of restenosis. In: Intracoronary ultrasound. London: Taylor and Francis, 2005:299-400.
2. Russo RJ, Silva PD, Yeager M. Coronary artery overexpansion increases neointimal hyperplasia after stent placement in a porcine model. Heart 2007;93:1609-15.
3. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Mehran R, et al. Tissue proliferation within and surrounding Palmaz-Schatz stents is dependent on the aggressiveness of stent implantation technique. Am J Cardiol 1998;83:1170-4.
4. Schwartz RS, Murphy JG, Edwards WD. Restenosis after balloon angioplasty: a practical proliferative model in porcine coronary arteries. Circulation 1990;82:2190-200.
5. Cook S, Wenaweser P, Togni M, et al. Incomplete stent apposition and very late stent thrombosis following drug-eluting stent implantation. Circulation 2007;115:2416-34.
6. Aziz S, Morris JL, Perry RA, et al. Stent expansion: a combination of delivery balloon underexpansion and acute stent recoil reduces predicted stent diameter irrespective of reference vessel size. Heart 2007;93:1562-6.
7. Carrozza JP, Hosley SE, Cohen DJ, et al. In vivo assessment of stent expansion and recoil in normal porcine coronary arteries. Circulation 1999;100:756-60.
8. Bermejo J, Botas J, Garcia E, et al. Mechanisms of residual lumen stenosis after high-pressure stent implantation. Circulation 1998;98:112-8.
9. Regar E, Schaar J, Serruys PW, et al. Images in cardiology. Acute recoil in sirolimus eluting stent: real time, in vivo assessment with optical coherence tomography. Heart 2006;92:123.
10. Mintz GS, Popma JJ, Hong MK, et al. Intravascular ultrasound to discern device-specific effects and mechanisms of restenosis. Am J Cardiol 1996;78:18-22.
11. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Dussaillant GR, et al. Patterns and mechanisms of instent restenosis: a serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 1996;94:1247-54.
12. Schiele F, Meneveau N, Vuillemenot A, et al. The REStensois after IVUS-guided Stenting (RESIST) Study Group. Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance in stent deployment on 6-month restenosis rate: a multicenter, randomised study comparing two strategies-with and without intravascular guidance. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:320-8.
13. Russo RJ, Attubato MJ, Davidson CJ, et al. Angiography versus intravascular ultrasound-directed stent placement: final results from AVID [abstract]. Circulation, 1999;100(suppl I), 234.
14. Mudra H, di Mario C, de Jaegere P, et al. Randomised comparison of coronary stent implantation under ultrasound or angiographic guidance to reduce stent restenosis. (OPTICUS Study). Circulation 2001;104:1343-9.
15. King SB. Restenosis: the mouse that roared. Circulation 2003;108:248-9.
16. Mintz GS, Weissmann NJ. Intravascular ultrasound in the drug-eluting stent era. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:421-9.
17. Di Ribamar Costa J, Mintz GS, et al. Assessing drug-eluting stent expansion: lessons learned from intravascular ultrasound. Am J Cardiol, 2006;47(Suppl B), 11B.