Reflections on policy-oriented learning in transnational visioning processes: The case of the Atlantic Spatial Development Perspective (ASDP)

Planning Practice and Research

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 329-345

  Farthing, Stuart ^a   Carrière, Jean Paul ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EUROPEAN UNION; LEARNING; REGIONAL PLANNING; SPATIAL PLANNING;

EURASIA; EUROPE;

EID: 36749045781     PISSN: 02697459     EISSN: 13600583     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02697450701637580     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Atlantic Arc Commission (1992) Prospective Study for the Atlantic Regions. AA Chronicle, 6
2. Carrière, J. P. (2004) L'amánagement du territoire en Europe: Vers une approche polycentrique mAltiscalaire: analyse à partir du cas de l'espace atlantique. Le Développement territorial. Regards croisés sur la diversification et les stratégies, pp. 61-79. Editions ADICUEER, Poitiers
3. Carrière, J. P. (2005) Une réflexion sur la construction du polycentrisme en Europe: Apports et limites du rapport ESPON 111 "Potentials for polycentric development in Europe". Revue Territoires 2030, 1, pp. 47-63.
4. Carrière, J. P. (2007) Les disparités territoriales en Europe: Un défi pour l'intégration. Revue Pouvoirs locaux, 72
5. Carrière, J. P. (2007) Urban typologies and the construction of spatial visions: The example of the Atlantic area. Cities and Networks in Europe: A Critical Approach to Polycentrism, pp. 15-26. John Libbey Eurotext, Montrouge
6. Cicholawz, P. (2005) France and the ESDP. European Planning Studies, 13:2, pp. 285-295.
7. Commission of Peripheral Maritime Regions (2005) Atlantic Spatial Development Perspective, CPMR, Rennes
8. Commission of the European Communities (1991) Europe 2000: Outlook for the Development of the Community's Territory, CEC, Brussels
9. Commission of the European Communities (1994) Europe 2000+: Cooperation for European Territorial Development, OOPEC, Luxembourg
10. Commission of the European Communities (1994) Study of the Prospects in the Atlantic Regions, OOPEC, Luxembourg
11. Commission of the European Communities (1996) Communication to the Member States laying down guidelines for operational programmes which Member States are invited to establish in the framework of a Community Initiative concerning transnational cooperation on spatial planning (INTERREG IIC), pp. 23-28.
12. Doucet, P. (2002) Transnational planning in the wake of the ESDP: The northwest Europe experience. European Spatial Planning, pp. 59-79. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA
13. Dühr, S. (2003) Illustrating spatial policies in Europe. European Planning Studies, 11:8, pp. 929-948.
14. Dühr, S. and Nadin, V. (2007) Europeanization through Transnational Territorial Cooperation? The case of INTERREG IIIB North-West Europe. Planning Practice and Research, 22:3, pp. 373-394.
15. Dühr, S., Stead, D. and Zonneveld, W. (2007) The Europeanization of spatial planning through territorial cooperation: Introduction to the Special Issue. Planning Practice and Research, 22:3, pp. 291-307.
16. ESPON 1.1.1 Report (2004) Potentials for Polycentric Development in Europe, Final Project Report, European Spatial Planning Observatory Network, Luxembourg
17. Faludi, A. (2002) The European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP): An overview. European Spatial Planning, pp. 3-18. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA
18. Gløersen, E., Lähteenmäki-Smith, K. and Dubois, A. (2007) Polycentricity in transnational planning initiatives: ESDP applied or ESDP reinvented?. Planning Practice and Research, 22:3, pp. 417-437.
19. Harrison, A. and Sweeting, D. (2000) In or out of the Atlantic Arc - the case of Bristol in south west England. Les Citès Atlantiques: Villes Péripheriques ou Métropoles de Demain?, pp. 305-334. Publisud, Paris
20. Hooghe, L. (1995) Subnational mobilisation in the EU. West European Politics, 18:3, pp. 175-198.
21. John, P. (2001) Local Governance in Western Europe, Sage, London
22. Kuhn, T. S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago University Press, Chicago
23. Lakatos, I. (1978) The methodology of scientific research programmes. Philosophical Papers, 1, pp. 1-101. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
24. Lenschow, A. (2006) Europeanisation of public policy. European Union Power and Policy-making, pp. 55-71. Routledge, Abingdon
25. Nadin, V. (2002) Visions and visioning in European spatial planning. European Spatial Planning, pp. 121-137. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA
26. Nadin, V. and Shaw, D. P. (1998) Transnational spatial planning in Europe: The role of INTERREG IIC in the UK. Regional Studies, 32:3, pp. 281-299.
27. Nadin, V. and Shaw, D. P. (2000) Transnational collaboration in the Atlantic Region. Les Cités Atlantiques: Villes Péripherique ou Métropoles de Demain?, pp. 15-41. Publisud, Paris
28. Perroux, F. (1955) La notion de pôle de croissance. Economie Appliquée, 1
29. Robert, J. and Stumm, T. (2006) Spatial Visions and Scenarios - Thematic Study of INTERREG and ESPON Activities, ESPON-Interact
30. Sabatier, P. A. (1998) The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5, pp. 98-130.
31. Sabatier, P. A. and Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1999) The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. Theories of the Policy Process, pp. 117-166. Westview Press, Oxford
32. Smith, A. (2000) Policy networks and advocacy coalitions: Explaining policy change and stability in UK industrial pollution policy?. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 18, pp. 95-114.
33. Veltz, P. (1996) Mondialisation, Villes et Territoires, PUF, Paris
34. Waterhout, B. and Stead, D. (2007) Mixed Messages: How the ESDP's Concepts Have Been Applied in INTERREG IIIB Programmes, Priorities and Projects. Planning Practice and Research, 22:3, pp. 395-415.
35. Wise, M. (2000) The Atlantic Arc: Transnational European reality or regional mirage?. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38:5, pp. 865-890.
36. Zonneveld, W. (2005) Expansive spatial planning: The new European Transnational spatial visions. European Planning Studies, 13:1, pp. 137-155.