A weighted logistic regression for conjoint analysis and kansei engineering

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 689-706

  Barone, Stefano ^a   Lombardo, Alberto ^a   Tarantino, Pietro ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PALERMO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Attribute rating; Conjoint analysis; Kansei engineering; Ordinal logistic regression

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOBILE PHONES; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ATTRIBUTE RATING; CONJOINT ANALYSIS; KANSEI ENGINEERING; ORDINAL LOGISTIC REGRESSION;

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING;

EID: 36749032311     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: 10991638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qre.866     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Green PE, Wind Y. New way to measure consumers' judgments. Harvard Business Review 1975; July-August: 107-117.
2. Cohen L. Quality Function Deployment. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1995.
3. Center for Quality Management. Kano's methods for understanding customer-defined quality. The Center for Quality Management Journal 2003; 2(4):3-36.
4. Nagamachi M. Kansei Engineering: A new ergonomie consumer-oriented technology for product development. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 1995; 15:3-11.
5. Schütte S, Eklund J. Design of rocker switches for work-vehicles-An application of Kansei Engineering. Applied Ergonomics 2005; 36:557-567.
6. O'Muircheartaigh C. Measurement error in surveys: A historical perspective. Survey Measurement and Process Quality (Series in Probability and Statistics). Wiley: New York, 1997.
7. Nakada K. Kansei Engineering research on the design of construction machinery. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 1997; 19:129-146.
8. Jindo T, Hirasago K. Application studies to car interior of Kansei Engineering. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 1997; 19:105-114.
9. Tanoue C, Ishizaka K, Nagamachi M. Kansei Engineering: A study on perception of vehicle interior image. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 1997; 19:115-128.
10. Matsubara Y, Nagamachi M. Hybrid Kansei Engineering system and design support. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 1997; 19:115-128.
11. Green PE, Srinivasan V. Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research 1978; 5:103-123.
12. Kessels R, Goos P, Vandebroek M. Estimating people's values. ENBIS Magazine 2005, Scientific Computing World, 2005; 40-41.
13. Green PE, Rao VR. Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data. Journal of Marketing Research 1971; 8:355-363.
14. Cattin P, Wittink DR. Commercial use of conjoint analysis: A survey. Journal of Marketing 1982; 46:44-53.
15. Green PE, Srinivasan V. Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research 1978; 5(2): 103-123.
16. Green PE, Srinivasan V. Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. Journal of Marketing 1990; October:3-19.
17. Green PE, Krieger AM, Agarwal MK. Adaptive conjoint analysis: Some caveats and suggestions. Journal of Marketing Research 1991; 28:215-222.
18. Barone S, Lombardo A. Service quality design through a smart use of conjoint analysis. Asian Journal on Quality 2004; 5(1):34-42.
19. Gustafsson A, Ekdhal F, Bergman B. Conjoint analysis: A useful tool in the design process. Total Quality Management 1999; 10(3):327-343.
20. Barone S, Lanzotti A. Quality Engineering approach to improve comfort of a new vehicle in virtual environment. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association: Statistical Computing Section, 2002, Alexandria, VA. American Statistical Association: Alexandria, VA, 2002.
21. Lance CE, Woehr DJ. Statistical control of halo: Clarification from two cognitive models of the performance appraisal process. Journal of Applied Psychology 1986; 71(4):679-685.
22. Murphy KR, Jako RA, Anhalt LR. Nature and consequence of halo error: A critical analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 1993; 78(2):218-225.
23. Jaccard J, Brinberg D, Ackerman LJ. Assessing attribute importance: A comparison of six methods. Journal of Consumer Research 1986; 12(March):463-468.
24. Alpert MI. Identification of determinant attributes: A comparison of methods. Journal of Marketing Research 1971; 8(May):184-191.
25. Haire M. Projective techniques in marketing research. Journal of Marketing 1950; 14:649-652.
26. Donoghue S. Projective techniques in consumer research. Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences 2000; 28:47-53.
27. Heeler RM, Hokechuku C, Reid S. Attribute importance: Contrasting measurements. Journal of Marketing Research 1979; 16(February):60- 63.
28. Kohli R. Assessing attribute significance in conjoint analysis: nonparametric test and empirical validation. Journal of Marketing Research 1988; 15(May): 123-133.
29. Barone S, Lombardo A. Service quality design through a smart use of conjoint analysis. The Asian Journal on Quality 2004; 5(1):34-42.
30. Fischer GW, Luce MF, Jia J. Attribute conflict and preference uncertainty: Effects on judgment time and error. Management Science 2000; 46(1):88-103.
31. McCullagh P, Nelder JA. Generalized Linear Models (2nd edn). Chapman & Hall: London, 2000.
32. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis (2nd edn). Wiley: New York, 2002.
33. Lawson C, Montgomery DC. Logistic regression analysis of customer satisfaction data. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2006; 22(8):971-984.
34. McCullagh P. Regression models for ordinal data. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1990; 42(2):109-142.
35. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression (2nd edn). Wiley: New York, 2000.
36. Cohen J, Cohen P. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for Behavioural Sciences (2nd edn). Lawrence Erlbaum: London, 1983.
37. Hosmer DW, Hosmer T, Le Cessie S, Lemeshow S. A comparison of goodness-of-fit test for the logistic regression model. Statistics in Medicine 1997; 16:965-980.
38. Lipsitz SR, Fitzmaurice GM, Molenberghs G. Goodness-of-fit tests for ordinal response regression models. Applied Statistics 1996; 45(2):175-190.
39. Tsiatis A. A note on a goodness-of-fit test for the logistic regression model. Biometrika 1980; 67(1):250-251.
40. Osius G, Rojek D. Normal goodness-of-fit tests for multinomial models with large degrees of freedom. Journal of the American Statistical Association-Theory and Methods 1992; 87(420):1145-1152.
41. Begg CB, Gray R. Calculation of polychotomous logistic regression parameters using individualized regressions. Biometrika 1984; 71:11-18.