Conjoint analysis: A useful tool in the design process

Total Quality Management

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 327-343

  Gustafsson, Anders ^a,b   Ekdahl, Fredrik ^a   Bergman, Bo ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b KARLSTAD UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1542629710     PISSN: 09544127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0954412997866     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. ANDERSSON, R. (1991) QFD-A System for More Efficient Product Development (Lund, Studentlitteratur) (in Swedish).
2. BERGMAN, B., GUSTAFSSON, A. & GUSTAFSSON, N. (1991) Quality function deployment as a tool for improving a course in total quality management and methodology, Proceedings from the 2nd Symposium Renault-Volvo de la Qualité., Paris.
3. BERGMAN, B. & KLEFSJÖ, B. (1994) Quality from Customer Needs to Customer Satisfaction (London, McGraw-Hill).
4. Box, G.E.P., HUNTER, W.G. & HUNTER, J.S. (1978) Statistics for Experimenters-An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building (New York, John Wiley).
5. CATTIN, P. & WITTINK, D. (1982) Commercial use of conjoint analysis: a survey, Journal of Marketing, 46, pp. 44-53.
6. CHURCHILL, G.A. (1995) Marketing Research-Methodological Foundations, 6th Edn (New York, The Dryden Press).
7. GREEN, E.P. & SRINIVASAN, V. (1990) Conjoint analysis in marketing: new developments with implications for research and practice, Journal of Marketing, October, pp. 3-19.
8. GREEN, P., CARROL, D. & GOLDBERG, S. (1981) A general approach to product design optimization via conjoint analysis, Journal of Marketing, 45, pp. 17-37.
9. GREEN, P. & RAO, V. (1971) Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data, Journal of Marketing Research, 1, pp. 61-68.
10. GREEN, P. & SRINIVASAN, V. (1978) Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook, Journal of Consumer Research, 5, pp. 103-123.
11. GUSTAFSSON, A. (1993) QFD and conjoint analysis-the key to customer oriented products, LiU-Tek-Lic-1993:35, Linköping University.
12. GUSTAFSSON, A. (1996) Customer focused product development by conjoint analysis and QFD, Linköping Studies in Science and Technology, Linköping University.
13. HOLBROOK, M.B. & MOORE, W.L. (1981) Feature interactions in consumer judgments of verbal versus pictorial presentation, Journal of Consumer Research, 8, pp. 103-113.
14. JOHNSON, R.M. (1989) Assessing the validity of conjoint analysis. In: M. METEGRANO (Ed.) Gaining a Competitive Advantage through PC-based Interviewing and Analysis. I (Sun Valley, ID, Sawtooth Software), pp. 273-280.
15. KANDA, N. (1994) The seven product planning tools for new product development, Hinshitsu Kanri, 45, pp. 73-80.
16. KANO, N. (1995) Upsizing the organization by attractive quality creation. In: G.K.KANJI (Ed.) Total Quality Management-Proceedings of the First World Congress (London, Chapman & Hall), pp. 60-72.
17. KANO, N., SERAKU, N., TAKAHASHI, F. & TSUJI, S. (1984) Attractive quality and must-be-quality, Quality, 14, pp. 147-156.
18. LUCE, D. & TUKEY, J. (1964) Simultaneous conjoint measurement: a new type of fundamental measurement, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, pp. 1-27.
19. PLACKETT, R.L. & BURMAN, J.P. (1946) The design of optimum multifactorial experiments, Biometrika, 23, pp. 305-325.
20. PUGH, S. (1981) Concept selection, a method that works, International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED-81), Rome, pp. 497-506.
21. SENGE, P.M. (1990) The Fifth Discipline (New York, Doubleday).
22. SHEWHART, W.A. (1931) Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product (New York, D. Van Nostrand).
23. WITTINK, R.D. & CATTIN, P. (1989) Commercial use of conjoint analysis: an update, Journal of Marketing, 53, pp. 91-96.
24. WITTINK, D.R., VRIENS, M. & BURHENNE, W. (1994) Commercial use of conjoint analysis in Europe: results and critical reflections, University of Groningen.