The assemblage of acoustically communicating crickets of a tropical evergreen forest in southern india: Call diversity and diel calling patterns

Bioacoustics

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 113-135

  Diwakar, Swati ^a   Balakrishnan, Rohini ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

Acoustic community; Diel calling patterns; Ensifera; India; Tropical forests

Indexed keywords

BIOACOUSTICS; BIODIVERSITY; COMMUNICATION BEHAVIOR; CRICKET; DIEL VARIATION; EVERGREEN FOREST; TROPICAL FOREST;

ASIA; EURASIA; INDIA; SOUTH ASIA;

GRYLLIDAE; GRYLLOIDEA; TETTIGONIIDAE; TETTIGONIOIDEA;

EID: 36749029978     PISSN: 09524622     EISSN: 21650586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09524622.2007.9753571     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Amédégnato, C., 1997. “ Diversity of an Amazonian canopy grasshopper community in relation to resource partitioning and phylogeny ”. In Canopy Arthropods Edited by:Stork, N. E., Adis, J., and Didham, R. K., 281–319. London:Chapman and Hall.
2. Bailey, W. J., 1991. Acoustic Behaviour of Insects, pp. 225. London, Chapman and Hall.
3. Basset, Y., Aberlenc, H. P., and Delavare, G., 1992. Abundance and stratification of foliage arthropods in a lowland rainforest of Cameroon. Ecol. Entomol., 17:310–318.
4. Beier, M., 1962. Das Tierreich. Eine Zusammenstellung und Kennzeichnung der rezenten Tierformen. Berlin:Walter de Gruyter and Co.
5. Belwood, J. J., and Morris, G. K., 1987. Bat predation and its influence on calling behaviour in Neotropical katydids. Science, 238:64–67.
6. Brunner von Wattenwyl, C., 1888. Monographie der Stenopelmatiden und Gryllacriden. Verhandlungen zoologische-botanische Gesellschaft, 38:247–394.
7. Carothers, J. H., and Jaksic, F. M., 1984. Time as a niche difference:the role of interference competition. Oikos, 42:403–406.
8. Case, T. J., and Gilpin, M. E., 1974. Interference competition and niche theory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 71:3073–3077. USA
9. Chopard, L., 1969. The fauna of India and the adjacent countries:Orthoptera Vol.2 Grylloidea. Edited by:Sewell, R. B. S., Calcutta:Baptist Mission Press. The Zoological Survey of India)
10. Colwell, R. K., 2005. EstimateS:Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples Storrs:University of Connecticut. Version 7.5 User's guide and applicationhttp://viceroy.eeb. uconn.edu/estimates [accessed on 13/06/2005]
11. Colwell, R. K., and Coddington, J. A., 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 345:101–118.
12. Desutter Grandcolas, L., 1997. Le peuplement de grillons (Orthopteres, Grylloidea) des sous-bois forestiers du Col d'Amieu (Nouvelle-Caledonie). I. Etude du peuplement. Mem. Mus. Nat. d'Hist. Natl., 171:125–135.
13. Diwakar, S., and Balakrishnan, R., 2006. Male and female stridulation in an Indian weta (Orthoptera:Anostostomatidae). Bioacoustics, 16
14. Drewry, G. E., and Rand, A. S., 1983. Characteristics of an acoustic community:Puerto Rican frogs of the genus Eleutherodactylus. Copeia, 4:941–953.
15. Duellman, W. E., and Pyles, R. E., 1983. Acoustic resource partitioning in anuran communities. Copeia, 3:639–649.
16. Ficken, R. W., and Ficken, M. S., 1974. Temporal pattern shifts to avoid acoustic interference in singing birds. Science, 183:762–763.
17. Floren, A., Riede, K., and Ingrisch, S., 2001. Diversity of Orthoptera from Bornean lowland rainforest trees. Ecotropica, 7:33–42.
18. Gogala, M., and Riede, K., 1995. Time sharing of song activity by cicadas in Temengor Forest Reserve, Hulu Peak, and in Sabah, Malaysia. Malay. Nat. J., 48:97–305.
19. Gottsberger, B., and Gruber, E., 2004. Temporal partitioning of reproductive activity in a neotropical anuran community. J. Trop. Ecol., 20:271–280.
20. Hödl, W., 1977. Call differences and calling site segregation in anuran species from Central Amazonian floating meadows. Oecologia, 28:351–363.
21. Heller, K. G., 1995. Acoustic signalling in paleotropical bushcrickets (Orthoptera:Tettigonioidea:Pseudophyllinae):does predation pressure by eavesdropping enemies differ in the Paleo- and Neotropics?. J. Zool. (Lond), 237:469–485.
22. Hsu, M. Y., Kam, Y. C., and Fellers, G. M., 2006. Temporal organization of an anuran acoustic community in a Taiwanese subtropical forest. J. Zool. (Lond), 269:331–339.
23. Kemp, W. P., Harvey, S. J., and Neill, K. M., 1990. Patterns of vegetation and grasshopper community composition. Oecologia, 83:299–308.
24. Kronfeld-Schor, N., and Dayan, T., 2003. Partitioning of time as an ecological resource. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 34:153–181.
25. Lang, A. B., Kalko, E. K. V., Römer, H., Bockholdt, C., and Dechmann, D. K. N., 2006. Activity levels of bats and katydids in relation to the lunar cycle. Oecologia, 146:659–666.
26. Montealegre, F., and Morris, G. K., 1999. Songs and systematics of some Tettigoniidae from Colombia and Ecuador I. Pseudophyllinae (Orthoptera). J. Orth. Res., 8:163–236.
27. Montealegre, F., and Morris, G. K., 2004. The spiny devil katydids, Panacanthus Walker (Orthoptera:Tettigoniidae):an evolutionary study of acoustic behaviour and morphological traits. Syst. Entomol., 29:21–57.
28. Morris, G. K., and Beier, M., 1982. Song structure and description of some Costa Rican katydids (Orthoptera:Tettigoniidae). Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc., 108:287–314.
29. Morris, G. K., Klimas, D. E., and Nickle, D. A., 1989. Acoustic signals and systematics of false leaf katydids from Ecuador (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Pseudophyllinae). Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc., 114:215–264.
30. Nischk, F., and Otte, D., 2000. Bioacoustics, ecology and systematics of Ecuadorian rainforest crickets (Orthoptera:Gryllidae:Phalangopsinae), with a description of four new genera and ten new species. J. Orth. Res., 9:229–254.
31. Nischk, F., and Riede, K., 2001. “ Bioacoustics of two cloud forest ecosystems in Ecuador compared to a lowland rainforest with special emphasis on singing cricket species ”. In Epiphytes and canopy fauna of the Otongan rainforest (Ecuador) Edited by:Neider, J., and Barthlott, W., Vol. 2, 217–242.
32. Nityananda, V., and Balakrishnan, R., 2006. A diversity of songs among morphologically indistinguishable katydids of the genus Mecopoda (Orthoptera:Tettigoniidae) from Southern India. Bioacoustics, 15:223–250.
33. Otte, D., 1994. The Crickets of Hawaii. Origin, Systematics and Evolution. Philadelphia:The Orthopterist's Society at the Academy of Natural Sciences.
34. Otte, D., Eades, D. C., and Naskrecki, P., 2006. Orthoptera Species File Online http://osf2x.orthoptera.org/osf2.3/OSF2X2Frameset.html.
35. Rentz, D. C. F., 1996. Grasshopper Country:The Abundant Orthopteroid Insects of Australia. New South Wales:University of New South Wales Press.
36. Riede, K., 1993. Monitoring biodiversity:analysis of Amazonian rainforest sounds. Ambio, 22:546–548.
37. Riede, K., 1997. “ Bioacoustic monitoring of insect communities in a Bornean rain forest canopy ”. In Canopy Arthropods Edited by:Stork, N. E., Adis, J., and Didham, R. K., 442–452. London:Chapman and Hall.
38. Riede, K., 1998. Acoustic monitoring of Orthoptera and its potential for conservation. J. Insect Conserv., 2:217–223.
39. Riede, K., and Kroker, A., 1995. Bioacoustics and niche differentiation in two cicada species from Bornean lowland forest. Zool. Anz., 234:43–51.
40. Rutledge, E. J. G., and Narins, P. M., 2001. Shared acoustic resources in an Old World frog community. Herpetologica, 57:104–116.
41. Shaw, K. L., 1999. A nested analysis of song groups and species boundaries in the Hawaiian cricket genus Laupala. Mol. Genet. Evol., 11:332–341.
42. Stork, N. E., 1991. The composition of the arthropod fauna of Bornean lowland rainforest trees. J. Trop. Ecol., 7:161–180.
43. Sueur, J., 2002. Cicada acoustic communication:potential sound partitioning in a multispecies community from Mexico. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 75:379–394.
44. Sueur, J., and Aubin, T., 2003. Is microhabitat segregation between two cicada species (Tibicina haematodes, Cicada orni) due to calling song propagation constraints?. Naturwissenschaften, 90:332–326.
45. Wiley, R. H., and Richards, D. G., 1978. Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere:Implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 3:69–94.