The influence of legal coercion on dropout from substance abuse treatment: Results from a national survey

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volumn 92, Issue 1-3, 2008, Pages 123-131

  Perron, Brian E ^a   Bright, Charlotte L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Legal coercion; Mandated treatment; Survival analysis; Treatment dropout

Indexed keywords

METHADONE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DEPENDENCE; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTPATIENT CARE; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENTIAL CARE; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMBULATORY CARE; COERCION; CRIMINAL LAW; DATA COLLECTION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ETHNIC GROUPS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONG-TERM CARE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 36749020680     PISSN: 03768716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.07.011     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anglin M.D., Brecht M., and Maddahian E. Pretreatment characteristics and treatment performance of legally coerced versus voluntary methadone maintenance admissions. Criminology 27 3 (1989) 537-557
2. Brecht M., Anglin M.D., and Wang J. Treatment effectiveness for legally coerced versus voluntary methadone maintenance clients. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 19 1 (1993) 89-106
3. Broome K.M., Flynn P.M., and Simpson D.D. Psychiatric comorbidity measures as predictors of retention in drug abuse treatment. Health Serv. Res. 34 4 (1999) 791-806
4. Burke A.C., and Gregoire T.K. Substance abuse treatment outcomes for coerced and noncoerced clients. Health Soc. Work 31 (2007) 7-15
5. Caplan A.L. Ethical issues surrounding forced, mandated, or coerced treatment. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 31 2 (2006) 117-120
6. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis For the Behavioral Sciences. second ed (1988), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdales
7. Cooper C.S. Drug courts: current issues and future perspectives. Subst. Use Misuse 38 11-13 (2003) 1671-1711
8. Easton C.J., Babuscio T., and Carroll K.M. Treatment retention and outcome among cocaine-dependent patients with and without active criminal justice involvement. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 35 (2007) 83-91
9. Fagan R. The use of required treatment for substance users. Subst. Abuse 20 4 (1999) 249-261
10. Farabee D., Prendergrast M., and Anglin M.D. The effectiveness of coerced treatment for drug-abusing offenders. Fed. Probat. 62 1 (1998) 3-10
11. Gerstein, D.R., Datta, A.R., Ingels, J.S., Johnson, R.A., Rasinski, K.A., Schildhaus, S., Talley, K., Jordan, K., Phillips, D.B., Anderson, D.W., Condelli, W.G., Collins, J.S., 1997. The national treatment improvement evaluation study (NTIES): final report. SAMHSA.
12. Harrison L.D., and Scarpitti F.R. Introduction: progress and issues in drug treatment courts. Subst. Use Misuse 37 12-13 (2002) 1441-1467
13. Hough M. Drug user treatment within a criminal justice context. Subst. Use Misuse 37 8-10 (2002) 985-996
14. Hser Y.L., Polinsky M.L., Maglione M., and Anglin M.D. Matching clients' needs with drug treatment services. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 16 (1999) 299-305
15. Hunt N., and Stevens A. Whose harm? Harm reduction and the shift to coercion in UK drug policy. Soc. Policy Soc. 3 4 (2004) 333-342
16. Institute of Medicine. Improving the Quality of Health Care for Mental and Substance Use Conditions (2006), National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC
17. Jacobson J.O. Place and attrition from substance abuse treatment. J. Drug Issues 34 1 (2004) 23-50
18. Joe G.W., Simpson D.D., and Hubbard R.L. Treatment predictors of tenure in methadone maintenance. J. Subst. Abuse 3 (1991) 73-84
19. Kelly J.F., Finney J.W., and Moos R. Substance use disorder patients who are mandated to treatment: characteristics, treatment process, and 1- and 5-year outcomes. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 28 (2005) 213-223
20. Klag S., O'Callaghan F.V., and Creed P. The use of legal coercion in the treatment of substance abusers: an overview and critical analysis of thirty years of research. Subst. Use Misuse 40 12 (2005) 1777-1795
21. Marlowe D.B., Kirby K.C., Bonieskie L.M., Glass D.J., Dodds L.D., Husband S.D., Platt J.J., and Festinger D.S. Assessment of coercive and noncoercive pressures to enter drug abuse treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 42 2 (1996) 77-84
22. Marshall G.N., and Hser Y.I. Characteristics of criminal justice and noncriminal justice clients receiving treatment for substance abuse. Addict. Behav. 27 2 (2002) 179-192
23. Mateyoke-Scrivner A., Webster J.M., Staton M., and Leukefeld C. Treatment retention predictors of drug court participants in a rural state. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 30 3 (2004) 605-625
24. McHugo G.J., Drake R.E., Brunette M.F., Xie H., Essock S.M., and Green A.I. Enhancing validity in co-occurring disorders treatment research. Schizophr. Bull. 32 4 (2006) 655-665
25. Miller N.S., and Flaherty J.A. Effectiveness of coerced addiction treatment (alternative consequences): a review of the clinical research. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 18 1 (2000) 9-16
26. Morrow-Howell N., Proctor E.K., and Dore P. Post acute service to older adults with heart disease. J. Appl. Gerontol. 17 2 (1998) 150-171
27. National Association of Social Workers. Code of Ethics of the National Association of Social Workers (2007), National Association of Social Workers, Washington, DC
28. National Institute of Drug Abuse. Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment: A Research-based Guide. No. 99-4180 (1999), National Institute of Drug Abuse, Rockville
29. Nolan Jr. J.L. Drug treatment courts and the disease paradigm. Subst. Use Misuse 37 12-13 (2002) 1723-1750
30. Polcin D.L. Drug and alcohol offenders coerced into treatment: a review of modalities and suggestions for research on social model programs. Subst. Use Misuse 36 5 (2001) 589-608
31. Polcin D.L. Reexamining confrontation and motivational interviewing. Addict. Dis. Treat. 5 (2006) 201-209
32. Simpson D.D., Joe G.W., Rowan-Szal G.A., and Greener J.M. Drug abuse treatment process components that improve retention. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 14 6 (1997) 565-572
33. US Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, 2004. National treatment improvement evaluation study (NTIES), 1992-1997 [Computer file]. Conducted by National Opinion Research Center (NORC). Third ICPSR ed.
34. Wild T.C. Social control and coercion in addiction treatment: Towards evidence-based policy and practice. Addiction 101 (2006) 40-49
35. Wild T.C., Cunningham J.A., and Ryan R.M. Social pressure, coercion, and client engagement at treatment entry: A self-determination theory perspective. Addict. Behav. 31 (2006) 1858-1872
36. Woodside D.B., Carter J.C., and Blackmore E. Predictors of premature termination of inpatient treatment for anorexia nervosa. Am. J. Psychiatry 161 (2004) 2277-2281
37. Young D. Impacts of perceived legal pressure on retention in drug treatment. Crim. Justice Behav. 29 (2002) 27-55
38. Zhang Z., Friedmann P.D., and Gerstein D.R. Does retention matter? Treatment duration and improvement in drug use. Addiction 98 5 (2003) 673-684