Ethical issues surrounding forced, mandated, or coerced treatment

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 117-120

  Caplan, Arthur L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOETHICS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; CRIMINAL LAW; DECISION MAKING; DRUG DEPENDENCE; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; INFORMED CONSENT; MANDATORY PROGRAM; MORALITY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRISONER; REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE; RESEARCH ETHICS; RISK REDUCTION; TREATMENT REFUSAL;

EID: 33747110249     PISSN: 07405472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.06.009     Document Type: Note

References (7)

1. Barbera J., Macintyre A., Gostin L., et al. Large scale quarantine following biological terrorism in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association 286 (2001) 2711-2717
2. Beauchamp T.L., and Childress J. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th ed. (2001) Oxford
3. Caplan, A. (1997). The Ethics of Gatekeeping in Rehabilitation Medicine, 12, 29-37.
4. In: Caplan A., McCartney J., and Sisti D. (Eds). The case of Terri Schiavo (2006) Prometheus
5. Dworkin R. Life's Dominion (1998) Vintage
6. In: Lemmens T., and Waring R.D. (Eds). Law and Ethics in Biomedical Research (2006), University of Toronto Press
7. Mill J.S. On Liberty (1985) Penguin