Assessment of coronary stents using 40-detector row CT: Comparison with 16-detector row CT in vitro

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 910-916

  Suzuki, Shigeru ^a   Furui, Shigeru ^a   Kuwahara, Sadatoshi ^b   Vembar, Mani ^b   Kaminaga, Tatsuro ^a   Takei, Ryoji ^c   Isshiki, Takaaki ^a   Kozuma, Ken ^a   Aizawa, Tadanori ^c  

^a TEIKYO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^c THE CARDIOVASCULAR INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Computed tomographic angiography; Experimental studies; Multislice CT; Stent

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; SCANNING; STATISTICS; VISUALIZATION;

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENTS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; IN-VITRO; MULTISLICE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; STANDARD DEVIATION; STENOSES; STREAK ARTIFACTS; VASCULAR MODELLING;

STENTS;

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY STENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IN VITRO STUDY; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 36649030436     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/rct.0b013e31803c55c5     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Schmitz BL, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA. 2005;293:2471-2478.
2. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:2265-2270.
3. Kuettner A, Trabold T, Schroeder S, et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary lesions using 16-detector multislice spiral computed tomography technology: initial clinical results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1230-1237.
4. Maintz D, Seifarth H, Flohr T, et al. Improved coronary artery stent visualization and in-stent stenosis detection using 16-slice computed-tomography and dedicated image reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol. 2003;38:790-795.
5. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW, et al. Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:427-430.
6. Mahnken AH, Buecker A, Wildberger JE, et al. Coronary artery stents in multislice computed tomography: in vitro artifact evaluation. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:27-33.
7. Suzuki S, Furui S, Kaminaga T, et al. Evaluation of coronary stents in vitro with CT angiography: effect of stent diameter, convolution kernel, and vessel orientation to the z-axis. Circ J. 2005;69:1124-1131.
8. Hong C, Chrysant GS, Woodard PK, et al. Coronary artery stent patency assessed with in-stent contrast enhancement measured at multi-detector row CT angiography: initial experience. Radiology. 2004;233:286-291.
9. Maintz D, Juergens KU, Wichter T, et al. Imaging of coronary artery stents using multislice computed tomography: in vitro evaluation. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:830-835.
10. Maintz D, Grude M, Fallenberg EM, et al. Assessment of coronary arterial stents by multislice-CT angiography. Acta Radiol. 2003;44:597-603.
11. Stein PD, Beemath A, Kayali F, et al. Multidetector computed tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Am J Med. 2006;119:203-216.
12. Ehara M, Surmely JF, Kawai M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population-comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J. 2006;70:564-571.
13. Gaspar T, Halon DA, Lewis BS, et al. Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1573-1579.
14. Mahnken AH, Seyfarth T, Flohr T, et al. Flat-panel detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stents: phantom study in comparison with 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2005;40:8-13.
15. Seifarth H, Ozgun M, Raupach R, et al. 64- Versus 16-slice CT angiography for coronary artery stent assessment: in vitro experience. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:22-27.
16. Maintz D, Seifarth H, Raupach R, et al. 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:818-826.
17. Rist C, Nikolaou K, Flohr T, et al. High-resolution ex vivo imaging of coronary artery stents using 64-slice computed tomography - initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:1564-1569.
18. Robertson DD, Weiss PJ, Fishman EK, et al. Evaluation of CT techniques for reducing artifacts in the presence of metallic orthopedic implants. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1988;12:236-241.
19. Robertson DD, Yuan J, Wang G, et al. Total hip prosthesis metal-artifact suppression using iterative deblurring reconstruction. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997;21:293-298.
20. Seitz P, Rüegsegger P. CT bone densitometry of the anchorage of artificial knee joints. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1985;9:621-622.
21. Robertson DD, Magid D, Poss R, et al. Enhanced computed tomographic techniques for the evaluation of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1989;4:271-276.
22. Mahnken AH, Muhlenbruch G, Seyfarth T, et al. 64-slice computed tomography assessment of coronary artery stents: a phantom study. Acta Radiol. 2006;47:36-42.