Practice-based comparison of direct and indirect bonding

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 132, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 738-742

  Deahl, S Thomas ^a   Salome, Norman ^b   Hatch, John P ^b   Rugh, John D ^b  

^a Institute for Natural Resources and Biomed General Corporation Concord   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PATIENT CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DENTAL BONDING; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; EPISODE OF CARE; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 36649017095     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.037     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Aguirre M.J., King G.J., and Waldron J.M. Assessment of bracket placement and bond strength when comparing direct bonding to indirect bonding techniques. Am J Orthod 82 (1982) 269-276
2. Hocevar R.A., and Vincent H.F. Indirect versus direct bonding: bond strength and failure location. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 94 (1988) 367-371
3. Klocke A., Shi J., Kahl-Nieke B., and Bismayer U. Bond strength with custom base indirect bonding techniques. Angle Orthod 73 (2003) 176-180
4. Koo B.C., Chung C.H., and Vanarsdall R.L. Comparison of the accuracy of bracket placement between direct and indirect bonding techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116 (1999) 346-351
5. Milne J.W., Andreasen G.F., and Jakobsen J.R. Bond strength comparison: a simplified indirect technique versus direct placement of brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 96 (1989) 8-15
6. Read M.J., and O'Brien K.D. A clinical trial of an indirect bonding technique with a visible light-cured adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 98 (1990) 259-262
7. Rossouw P.E., Bruwer H.C., and Stander I.A. The rationale behind a viable alternative to direct bonding of orthodontic attachments. Indirect bonding. Ont Dent 72 (1995) 19-25
8. Wasserman R.C. Research in private pediatric practice and the challenge of network research. Curr Opin Pediatr 9 (1997) 483-486
9. Genel M., and Dobs A. Translating clinical research into practice: practice-based research networks-a promising solution. J Invest Med 51 (2003) 64-71
10. Williamson Jr. H.A. The roles of community practice-based research. Fam Pract Res J 12 (1992) 105-108
11. Solberg L.I., Cole P.M., and Seifert Jr. M.H. The Minnesota Academy of Family Physicians' Research Network: a vehicle for practice-based research. Minn Med 69 (1986) 599-601
12. Mjor I.A., Gordan V.V., Abu-Hanna A., and Gilbert G.H. Research in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 63 (2005) 1-9
13. Nutting P.A., Beasley J.W., and Werner J.J. Practice-based research networks answer primary care questions. JAMA 281 (1999) 686-688
14. Practice-based research networks. National Institute for Dental and Craniofacial Research. www.nidcr.nih.gov Accessed August 3, 2005.