Integrated semantic-based composition of skills and learning needs in knowledge-intensive organizations

Competencies in Organizational E-Learning: Concepts and Tools

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 270-298

  Colucci, Simona ^a   Di Noia, Tommaso ^a   Di Sciascio, Eugenio ^a   Donini, Francesco Maria ^b   Ragone, Azzurra ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI BARI   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TUSCIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36648999420     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-343-2.ch013     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Ajami, K. (2004). Specifying and implementing interoperable and reusable learning objects: One step beyond. In Proceedings of International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications (pp. 111-112).
2. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., & Patel-Schneider, P. (Eds.). (2002). The description logic handbook. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
3. Baader, F., Horrocks, I., & Sattler, U. (2003). Description logics as ontology languages for the Semantic Web. In D. Hutter & W. Stephan (Eds.), Festschrift in Honor of Jörg Siekmann, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. SV.
4. Becerra-Fernandez, I.(2000). The role of artificial intelligence technologies in the implementation of people-finder knowledge management systems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 13(5), 315-320.
5. Bennacer, N., Bourda, Y., & Doan, B. (2004). Formalizing for querying learning objects using OWL. In Proceedings of International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 321-325).
6. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001).The Semantic Web. Scientific American, 248(4), 34-43.
7. Brachman, R., & Levesque, H. (1984). The tractability of subsumption in frame-based description languages. In Proceedings of the Fourth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-84) (pp. 34-37).
8. Cabezuelo, A., & Beardo, J. (2004). Towards a model of quality for learning objects. In Proceedings of International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 822-825).
9. th International Workshop on Description Logics (DL'03), vol. 81 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 46-55.
10. Colucci, S., Di Noia, T., Di Sciascio, E., Donini, F., Mongiello, M., & Mottola, M. (2003b). Finding skills through ranked semantic match of descriptions [Special issue]. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 168-173.
11. Colucci, S., Di Noia, T., Di Sciascio, E., Donini, F., Mongiello, M., & Mottola, M. (2003c). A formal approach to ontology-based semantic match of skills descriptions. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 9(12), 1437-1454.
12. Colucci, S., Di Noia, T., Di Sciascio, E. Donini, F., & Mongiello, M. (2005c). Concept abduction and contraction for semantic-based discovery of matches and negotiation spaces in an E-marketplace. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 4(4), 345-361.
13. Colucci, S., Di Noia, T., Di Sciascio, E., Donini, F., Mongiello, M., & Piscitelli, G. (2004). Semantic-based approach to task assignment of individual profiles. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 10(6), 723-730.
14. Colucci, S., Di Noia, T., Di Sciascio, E., Donini, F., Piscitelli, G., & Coppi, S. (2005a). Knowledge based approach to semantic composition of teams in an organization. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM (SIGAPP) Symposium on Applied Computing SAC-05 (pp. 1314-1319).
15. Colucci, S., Di Noia, T., Di Sciascio, E., Donini, F., & Ragone, A. (2005b). Semantic-based automated composition of distributed learning objects for personalized e-learning. The Semantic Web: Research and applications. 2nd European Semantic Web Conference, (Vol. 3532, pp. 633-648).
16. Cormen, T. H., Leiserson, C. E., & Rivest, R. L. (1990). Introduction to Algorithms. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
17. DAML+OIL (2001). DAML+OIL specifications. Retrieved from ww.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-index.html.
18. th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW 2004), 307-320.
19. th Intl. Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2003) (pp. 337-342).
20. Di Noia, T., Di Sciascio, E., Donini, F., & Mongiello, M. (2004b). A system for principled matchmaking in an electronic marketplace. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(4), 9-37.
21. DublinCore (1999). DublinCore metadata element set, (version 1.1): Reference description. Retrieved from http://dublincore.org/documents/1999/07/02/dces/.
22. Galil, Z. (1986). Efficient algorithms for finding maximum matching in graphs. ACM Computer Survey, 18(1), 23-38.
23. Gärdenfors, P. (1988). Knowledge in flux: Modeling the dynamics of epistemic states. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, MIT Press.
24. Garro, A., & Palopoli, L. (2003). An XML multi-agent system for e-learning and skill management. In Agent Technologies, Infrastructures, Tools, and Applications for E-Services, LCNS (Vol. 2592, pp. 283-294).
25. Gasevic, D., Jovanovic, J., & Devedzic, V. (2004). Enhancing learning object content on the Semantic Web. In Proceedings of International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 714-716).
26. Gronau, N., & Uslar, M. (2004). Integrating knowledge management and human resources via skill management. In Proceedings of I-KNOW '04 (pp. 135-142).
27. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, May-June, 79-91.
28. Hefke, M., & Stojanovic, L. (2004). An ontology-based approach for competence bundling and composition of ad-hoc teams in an organization. In Proceedings of I-KNOW'04 (pp. 126-134).
29. Hillier, F. S., & Lieberman, G. J. (1995). Introduction to operations research. MGH.
30. IEEE (2002). IEEE standard for learning object metadata, std 1484.12.1-2002 edition.
31. IEEE (2003). IEEE standard for learning technology-learning technology systems architecture (LTSA), std 1484.1-2003 edition.
32. IMS. (2001). Ims, learning resource meta-data best practices and implementation guide (version 1.1)-Final specification. Retrieved from http://www.imsproject.org/metadata/mdbestv1p1.html
33. th Conference of the National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications (pp. 315-320).
34. Kennington, J., & Wang, Z. (1991). An empirical analysis of the dense assignment problem: Sequential and parallel implementations. ORSA Journal on Computing, 3(4), 299-306.
35. Lau, T., & Sure, Y. (2002). Introducing ontology-based skills management at a large insurance company. In Modellierung 2002, Modellierung in der Praxis - Modellierung für die Praxis (Proceedings), Tutzing, Germany, March 25-27, 2002, pp.123-134.
36. Liu, P., & Dew, P. (2004). Using Semantic Web technologies to improve expertise matching within academia. In Proceedings of I-KNOW '04 (pp. 370-378).
37. McGuinness, D., Fikes, R., Hendler, J., & Stein, L. (2002). DAML+OIL: An ontology language for the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 17(5), 72-80.
38. O'Leary, D. (1998a). Enterprise knowledge management. IEEE Computer, 31(3), 54-61.
39. O'Leary, D. (1998b). Using AI in knowledge management: Knowledge bases and ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 13(3), 34-39.
40. OWL. (2004). Retrieved from www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/
41. OWL-S. (2004). The owl services coalition. Retrieved from www.daml.org/services/owls/1.0/owl-s.html
42. Saip, H. B., & Lucchesi, C. (1993). Matching algorithms for bipartite graph (Tech. Rep. No. CC -03/93). Universidade Estudal de Campinas, Departamento de Cincia da Computao.
43. Sanchez, S., & Sicilia, M. (2004). On the semantics of aggregation and generalization in learning object contracts. In Proceedings of International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 425-429). EEE.
44. SCORM. (2004). Advanced distributed systems (adl) lab, sharable content object reference model (SCORM). Retrieved from http://www.adlnet.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=scormabt
45. Staab, S., Studer, R., Schnurr, H.P., & Sure, Y. (2001). Knowledge processes and ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(1), 26-34.
46. nd IEEE Intl. Conference on Cognitive Informatics (ICCI 2003) (pp. 137-142). London: IEEE Computer Society.
47. Sure, Y., Maedche, A., & Staab, S. (2000). Leveraging corporate skill knowledge-From proper to ontoproper. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management, October 30-31, 2000, Basel, Switzerland, pp 22:1-22:9.
48. Sycara, K., Paolucci, M., Ankolekar, A., & Srinivasan, N. (2003). Automated discovery, interaction and composition of Semantic Web services. Journal of Web Semantics, 1(1), 27-46.
49. Trastour, D., Bartolini, C., & Priest, C. (2002). Semantic Web support for the businessto-business e-commerce lifecycle. In Proceedings of International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) '02 (pp. 89-98).
50. Veit, D., Muller, J., Schneider, M., & Fiehn, B. (2001). Matchmaking for autonomous agents in electronic marketplaces. In Proceedings of International Conference on Autonomous Agents '01 (pp. 65-66).
51. Vossen, G., & Jaeschke, P. (2003). Learning objects as a uniform foundation for e-learning platforms. In Proceedings of International Symposium on Database Engineering and Applications Symposium (pp. 278-287).
52. Yimam, D., & Kobsa, A. (2000). Expert finding systems for organizations: Domain analysis and the demoir approach. In M.S. Ackerman, V. Pipek, &V. Wulf (Eds.) Beyond knowledge management: Sharing expertise (pp. 327-358). Boston: MIT Press.