Significance of SSI and non-uniform near-fault ground motions in bridge response II: Effect on response with modular expansion joint

Engineering Structures

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 154-162

  Chouw, N ^a   Hao, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bridge structures; Large gap; Modular expansion joint; Non uniform excitation; Relative response; Soil structure interaction

Indexed keywords

BENDING MOMENTS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

COHERENCY LOSS FUNCTION; MODULAR EXPANSION JOINT SYSTEM; NEAR-SOURCE RESPONSE SPECTRUM; NON-UNIFORM EXCITATION; POUNDING RESPONSE;

BRIDGE COMPONENTS;

BENDING MOMENTS; BRIDGE COMPONENTS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

BRIDGE; GROUND MOTION; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION; SPATIAL VARIATION;

EID: 36549089470     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.02.020     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Chouw N, Hao H. Significance of SSI and non-uniform near-fault ground motions in bridge response I: Effect on response with conventional girder gap. J Eng Struct. [in press]
2. Anagnostopoulos S.A. Pounding of buildings in series during earthquakes. J Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 16 (1988) 443-456
3. Japan Society of Civil Engineers (JSCE). In: Hamada M, Nakamura S, Ohsumi T, Megro K, Wang E, editors. The 1999 Ji-Ji earthquake, Taiwan - investigation into damage to civil engineering structure. Tokyo; 1999. 160 pages
4. Kasai K., Jagiasi A.R., and Jeng V. Inelastic vibration phase theory for seismic pounding mitigation. ASCE J Struct Eng 122 10 (1996) 1136-1146
5. Penzien J. Evaluation of building separation distance required to prevent pounding during strong earthquakes. J Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 26 (1997) 849-858
6. Hao H., and Liu X. Estimation of required separations between adjacent structures under spatial ground motions. J Earthquake Eng 2 2 (1998) 197-215
7. Hao H., and Zhang S.R. Spatial ground motion effect on relative displacement of adjacent building structures. J Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 28 (1999) 333-349
8. Hao H., and Shen J. Estimation of relative displacement of two adjacent asymmetric structures. J Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 30 (2001) 81-96
9. International Building Officials. Uniform Building Code (UBC). Whittier (California, USA); 1999
10. National Research Council of Canada. National Building Code of Canada (NBCC). Ottawa (Ontario, Canada); 1990
11. Chinese Academy of Building Research. Seismic design code for building and structures - GBJ11-89. Beijing (China); 1989 [in Chinese]
12. Zhu P., Abe M., and Fujino Y. Evaluation of pounding countermeasures and serviceability of elevated bridge during seismic excitation using 3D modelling. J Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 33 (2004) 591-609
13. Hao H. A parametric study of required seating lengths for bridge decks during earthquake. J Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 27 (1998) 91-103
14. Zanardo G., Hao H., and Modena C. Seismic response of multi-span simply supported bridges to a spatially varying earthquake ground motion. J Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 31 (2002) 1325-1345
15. Jankowski K., Wilde K., and Fujino J. Reduction of pounding effects in elevated bridges during earthquakes. J Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 29 (2000) 195-212
16. Ruangrassamee A., and Kawashima K. Control of nonlinear bridge response with pounding effect by variable dampers. J Eng Struct 25 5 (2003) 593-606
17. Malhotra P.K. Dynamics of seismic pounding at expansion joints of concrete bridges. ASCE J Eng Mech 124 7 (1998) 794-802
18. Kim S.-H., Lee S.-W., Won J.-H., and Mha H.-S. Dynamic behaviour of bridges under seismic excitation with pounding between adjacent girders. Proc. 12th world conf. on earthquake eng (2000), New Zealand Society for Earthquake Eng., Auckland (New Zealand) Paper 1815
19. Kim S.H., and Shinozuka M. Effects of seismically induced pounding at expansion joints of concrete bridges. ASCE J Eng Mech 129 (2003) 1225-1234
20. Chouw N., and Hao H. Estimation of required seating length of bridge girders under non-uniform ground excitation and different ground conditions. JSCE J Appl Mech 8 (2005) 709-718
21. CALTRANS Seismic Design Criteria. Design manual-version 1.2. Sacramento (California): California Dept. of Transportation; 2001
22. Japan Road Association (JRA). Specifications for highway bridges - Part V: Seismic design. 5th ed., Tokyo; 2004 [in Japanese]
23. Dexter RJ, Mutziger MJ, Osberg CB. Performance testing for modular bridge joint systems. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) 2002. Report 467. 73 pages
24. Dexter R.J., Osberg C.B., and Mutziger M.J. Design, specification, installation, and maintenance of modular bridge expansion joint system. ASCE J Bridge Eng 6 (2001) 529-538
25. Roeder C.W. Fatigue and dynamic load measurements on modular expansion joints. J Constr Building Mater 12 (1998) 143-150
26. Crocetti R., and Edlund B. Fatigue performance of modular bridge expansion joints. ASCE J Performance Constr Facilities 17 4 (2003) 167-176
27. http://www.maurer-soehne.de
28. Chouw N, Hao H. Spatial seismic ground motion effect on responses of elevated bridges with pounding. In: Int. symposium on earthquake eng commemorating tenth anniversary of the 1995 Kobe earthquake. 2005. p C63-70
29. Hao H., Oliveira C.S., and Penzien J. Multiple-station ground motion processing and simulation based on SMART-1 array data. J Nuclear Eng Design 111 (1989) 293-310
30. Chouw N. Earthquake-induced pounding: Causes and effect on structures. In: Proc of int. conf. on shock and impact loads on structures. 2005. p 15-25
31. Chouw N, Hao H. Discussion on required seat length of bridge girders under current Japanese design specification. In: Proc of Australian earthquake eng society conf. 2005. p. 1/1-1/7