Estimation of required separations between adjacent structures under spatial ground motions

Journal of Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 197-215

  Hao, Hong ^a   Liu, Xueyi ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Dynamic response; Minimum required separation; Multiple excitations; Pounding; Quasistatic response; Seismic code; Total response

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032243759     PISSN: 13632469     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13632469809350319     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Anagnostopoulos, S. A. [1988] “Pounding of buildings in series during earthquakes," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 16, 443-456.
2. Anagnostopoulos, S. A. [1996] “Building pounding re-examined: How serious a problem is it?” Proc. 11th World Conference cm Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, Paper No. 2108.
3. Anagnostopoulos, S. A. and Spiliopoulos, K. V. [1992] “An investigation on earthquake induced pounding between adjacent buildings," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 21, 289-302.
4. Filiatrault, A., Cervantes, M., Folz, B. and Prion, H. [1994] “Pounding of buildings during earthquakes: A Canadian perspective,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 21, 251-265.
5. Filiatrault, A., Tinawi, R. and Massicotte, B. [1993] “Damage to a cable-stayed bridge during the 1988 Saguenay earthquake. Part 1: Pseudo-static analysis. Part 2: Dynamic analysis," J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE 119(5), 1432-1463.
6. Hao, H. [1993] “Arch responses to correlated multiple excitations,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 22, 389-404.
7. Hao, H., Oliveira, C. S. and Penzien, J. [1989] “Multiple-station ground motion processing and simulation based on SMART-1 array data,” Nuclear Engineering and Design 11, 293-310.
8. Jeng, V., Kasai, K. and Maison, B. F. [1992] “A spectral difference method to estimate building separations to avoid pounding,” Earthquake Spectra 8(2), 201-203.
9. Kasai, K., Jagiasi, R. A. and Jeng, V. [1996] “Inelastic vibration phase theory for seismic pounding,” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE 122(10), 1136-1146.
10. Kasai, K. and Maison, B. F. [1991] “Observation of structured pounding damage from the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake,” Proc. 6th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Toronto, Ontario, pp. 735-742.
11. Maison, B. F. and Kasai, K. [1990] “Analysis for the type of structural pounding,” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE 116(4), 957-977.
12. Maison, B. F. and Kasai, K. [1992] “Dynamics of pounding when two buildings collide,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 21, 771-786.
13. Murakami, M. and Penzien, J. [1975] “SHOCHU — Nonlinear response spectra for probabilistic seismic design and damage assessment of reinforced concrete structures," Report No. UCB/EERC-75/38, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
14. NBCC [1990] NBCC National Building Code of Canada, National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
15. NEHRP [1991] NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Development of Seismic Regulations of New Buildings, 1991 ed., Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, DC.
16. Newmark, N. M. and Hall, W. J. [1982] “Earthquake spectra and design,” Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, California 94704.
17. Rosenblueth, E. and Meli, R. [1986] “The 1985 earthquake: Causes and effects in Mexico City," Concrete International, American Concrete Institute 8(5), 23-24.
18. SDCBS [1989] SDCBS Seismic Design Code for Buildings and Structures GBJ 11-89, 1989 ed., Chinese Academy of Building Research, Beijing, China.
19. UBC [1994] UBC Uniform Building Code, 1994 ed., International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, California, USA.