Spatial and temporal resolution of millennial scale geomagnetic field models

Advances in Space Research

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 57-69

  Korte, M ^a   Constable, C G ^b  

^a GFZ GERMAN RESEARCH CENTRE FOR GEOSCIENCES   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Archaeomagnetism; Dipole moment; Geomagnetic field model

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; DIPOLE MOMENT; EARTH (PLANET); GEOMAGNETISM; HARMONIC GENERATION; SATELLITES;

ARCHAEOMAGNETISM; GEOMAGNETIC FIELD MODELS; HARMONIC DESCRIPTION; TEMPORAL RESOLUTION;

MAGNETIC FIELD MEASUREMENT;

EID: 36549048512     PISSN: 02731177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2007.03.094     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bloxham J., and Jackson A. Time-dependent mapping of the magnetic field at the core-mantle boundary. J. Geophys. Res. 97 (1992) 19,537-19,563
2. Bloxham J., Zatman S., and Dumberry M. The origin of geomagnetic jerks. Nature 420 6911 (2002) 65-68
3. Braginsky S. Magnetic waves in the Earth's core. Geomagn. Aeron. 7 (1967) 851-859
4. Coe R., Gromme S., and Mankinen E. Geomagnetic paleointensities from radiocarbon-dated lava flows on Hawaii and question of Pacific nondipole low. J. Geophys. Res. 83 (1978) 1740-1756
5. Constable C., Johnson C., and Lund S. Global geomagnetic field models for the past 3000 years: transient or permanent flux lobes?. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 358 (2000) 991-1008
6. Constable C.G., and Parker R.L. Smoothing, splines and smoothing splines: their application in geomagnetism. J. Comput. Phys. 78 (1988) 493-508
7. de Boor C. A Practical Guide to Splines (1978), Springer-Verlag, New York
8. Dormy E., Valet J.-P., and Courtillot V. Numerical models of the geodynamo and observational constraints. Geochem. Geophys. Geosys. 1 (2000) 10.1029/2000GC000062
9. Elsasser W., Ney E., and Winckler J. Cosmic-ray intensity and geomagnetism. Nature 178 (1956) 1226-1227
10. Finlay C., and Jackson A. Equatorially dominated magnetic field change at the surface of Earth's core. Science 300 (2003) 2084-2086
11. Gauss, C. Allgemeine Theorie des Erdmagnetismus. In: Resultate aus den Beobachtungen des des magnetischen Verein im Jahre 1838. Göttinger Magn. Ver., Leipzig, pp. 1-52, 1839.
12. Hongre L., Hulot G., and Khokhlov A. An analysis of the geomagnetic field over the past 2000 years. Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors 106 (1998) 311-335
13. Jackson A., Jonkers A., and Walker M. Four centuries of geomagnetic secular variation from historical records. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 358 (2000) 957-990
14. Jonkers A., Jackson A., and Murray A. Four centuries of geomagnetic data from historical records. Rev. Geophys. (2003) 41 10.1029/2002RG000115
15. Korte M., and Constable C. Continuous global geomagnetic field models for the past 3000 years. Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors 140 (2003) 73-89
16. Korte M., and Constable C. Continuous geomagnetic field models for the past 7 millennia: 2. CALS7K. Geochem. Geophys. Geosys. 6 (2005) Q02H16 10.1029/2004GC000801
17. Korte M., and Constable C. The geomagnetic dipole moment over the last 7000 years - new results from a global model. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 236 (2005) 348-358
18. Korte M., and Constable C. Centennial to millennial geomagnetic secular variation. Geophys. J. Int. 167 (2006) 43-52
19. Korte M., and Constable C. On the use of calibrated relative paleointensity records to improve millennial-scale geomagnetic field models. Geochem. Geophys. Geosys. 7 9 (2006) Q09004 10.1029/2006GC001368
20. Korte M., Genevey A., Constable C., Frank U., and Schnepp E. Continuous geomagnetic field models for the past 7 millennia: 1. a new global data compilation. Geochem. Geophys. Geosys. 6 (2005) Q02H15 10.1029/2004GC000800
21. Lal D. Theoretically expected variations in the terrestrial cosmic-ray production rates of isotopes. In: Castagnoli G.C. (Ed). Solar-Terrestrial Relationships and the Earth Environment in the Last Millennia (1988), North-Holland Physics Publishing, Amsterdam 216-233
22. Macmillan S., Maus S., Bondar T., Chambodut A., Golovkov V., Holme R., Langlais B., Lesur V., Lowes F., Lühr H., Mai W., Mandea M., Olsen N., Rother M., Sabaka T., Thomson A., and Wardinski I. The 9th-generation international geomagnetic reference field. Geophys. J. Int. 155 (2003) 1051-1056
23. Masarik J., and Beer J. Simulation of particle fluxes and cosmogenic nuclide production in the Earth's atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 104 (1999) 12,099-12,111
24. Maus S., Lühr H., Balasis G., Rother M., and Mandea M. Introducing POMME, the POtsdam Magnetic Model of the Earth. In: Reigber C., Lühr H., Schwintzer P., and Wickert J. (Eds). Earth Observation with CHAMP - Results from Three Years in Orbit (2005), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 293-298
25. McElhinny M., and Senanayake W. Variations in the geomagnetic dipole: I. The past 50,000 years. J. Geomag. Geoelectr. 34 (1982) 39-51
26. 14 C. Quatern. Sci. Rev. 24 (2005) 1849-1860
27. Ohno M., and Hamano Y. Spherical harmonic analysis of paleomagnetic secular variation curves. Central Core of the Earth 3 (1993) 205-212
28. Olson P. The disappearing dipole. Nature 416 (2002) 591-594
29. Riisager P., and Riisager J. Detecting multidomain magnetic grains in Thellier palaeointensity experiments. Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 125 (2001) 111-117
30. Shaw J. A new method of determining the magnitude of the palaeomagnetic field; application to five historic lavas and five archaeological samples. Geopys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 39 (1974) 133-141
31. Silverman B. Spline smoothing: the equivalent variable kernel method. Ann. Stat. 12 (1984) 898-916
32. Solanki S., Usoskin I., Kromer B., Schüssler M., and Beer J. Unusual activity of the sun during recent decades compared to the previous 11,000 years. Nature 431 (2004) 1084-1087
33. 12 C change. Quatern. Res. 35 (1991) 1-24
34. Thellier E. Sur la vérification d'une méthode permettant de déterminer l'intensité du champ terrestre dans le passé. C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 212 (1941) 281-283
35. Tsyganenko N. Modeling the earth's magnetospheric magnetic field confined within a realistic magnetopause. J. Geophys. Res. 100 (1995) 5599-5612
36. Tsyganenko N. Modeling the inner magnetosphere:4 The asymmetric ring current and region 2 birkeland currents revisited. J. Geophys. Res. 105 (2000) 27,739-27,754
37. Tsyganenko N. A model of the near magnetosphere with a dawn-dusk asymmetry. 1. Mathematical structure. J. Geophys. Res. 107 A8 (2002) 10.1029/2001JA000219
38. Tsyganenko N. A model of the near magnetosphere with a dawn-dusk asymmetry. 2. Parameterization and fitting to observations. J. Geophys. Res. 107 A8 (2002) 10.1029/2001JA000220
39. Tsyganenko N., Singer H., and Kasper J. Storm-time distortion of the inner magnetosphere: how severe can it get?. J. Geophys. Res. 108 A5 (2003) 10.1029/2002JA009808
40. Tsyganenko N., and Sitnov M. Modeling the dynamics of the inner magnetosphere during strong geomagnetic storms. J. Geophys. Res. 110 (2005) A03108 10.1029/2004JA010798
41. Walton D., Share J., Rolph T., and Shaw J. Microwave magnetisation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20 (1993) 10.1029/92GL02782
42. Yang S., Odah H., and Shaw J. Variations in the geomagnetic dipole moment over the last 12,000 years. Geophys. J. Int. 140 (2000) 158-162