Just how different are stakeholder group opinions on water management issues?

Desalination

Volumn 218, Issue 1-3, 2008, Pages 132-141

  Baggett, Sue ^a   Jefferson, Bruce ^a   Jeffrey, Paul ^a  

^a CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Natural resource management; Participatory planning; Stakeholder groups

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA); PLANNING; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE; WATER SUPPLY;

PARTICIPATORY PLANNING; STAKEHOLDER GROUPS;

WATER MANAGEMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA); PLANNING; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER SUPPLY;

PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; STAKEHOLDER; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER PLANNING;

EID: 36549005534     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.08.025     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. CEC (Commission of the European Communities). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official J. (OJL 327), 22 December 2000.
2. UNECE, Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to justice in Environmental Matters, Aarhus, Denmark (1998)
3. Syme G.J., Kals E., Nancarrow B.E., and Montada L. Ecological risks and community perceptions of fairness and justice. A cross-cultural model. Risk Anal. 20 6 (2000) 905-916
4. Tisdell J.G. Equity and social justice in water doctrines. Social Justice Res. 16 4 (2003) 401-416
5. de Garis Y., Lutt N., and Tagg A. Stakeholder involvement in water resources planning. Water Env. Manage. J. 17 1 (2003) 54-58
6. Webler T. The craft and theory dialectic of public participation. J. Risk Res. 2 1 (1999) 55-71
7. Sewell W.R.D., and Phillips S.D. Models for the evaluation of public participation programmes. Nat. Resour. J. 19 (1979) 338-358
8. Tuler S., Webler T., and Finson R. Competing perspectives on public involvement: Planning for risk characterization and risk communication about radiological contamination from a national laboratory. Health Risk Soc. 7 3 (2005) 247-266
9. Chess C., and Purcell K. Public participation and the environment: Do we know what works?. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33 16 (1999) 2685-2692
10. Beirele T.C., and Konisky D.M. Values, conflict, and trust in participatory environmental planning. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 19 4 (2000) 587-602
11. Tuler S., and Webler T. Voices from the forest: What participants expect of a public participation process. Soc. Natur. Resour. 12 (1999) 437-535
12. Rowe G., and Frewer L. Evaluating public participation exercises: A research agenda. Science, Technol. Hum. Val. 29 4 (2004) 512-556
13. Stanton J.M. An empirical assessment of data collection using the Internet. Pers. Psychol. 51 3 (1998) 709-726
14. Ilieva J., Baron S., and Healey N.M. Online surveys in marketing research: pros and cons. Int. J. Market Res. 44 3 (2002) 361-382
15. Couper M.P., Traugott M.W., and Lamias M.J. Web survey design and administration. Public Opin. Quart. 65 (2001) 230-253
16. Vehovar V., Lozar Manfreda K., and Batagelj Z. Errors in Web-based surveys. Proc. 53rd Session of the ISI, Seoul, South Korea, August 22-29 (2001)
17. Crawford S., McCabe S., Couper M.P., and Boyd C. From mail to web: Improving response rates and data collection efficiencies. Paper presented at the ICIS 2002 International Conference on Improving Surveys. Copenhagen, Denmark, August 25-28 (2002)
18. Dillman D.A. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 2nd ed. (1999), John Wiley & Sons, New York
19. BPS, Code of Conduct, Ethical Principles and Guidelines. The British Psychological Society, Leicester, UK, 2000.
20. Arnstein S.R. ladder of citizen participation. J. Amer. Inst. Planners 35 (1969) 216-224
21. Syme G.J., Kals E., Nancarrow B.E., and Montada L. Ecological risks and community perceptions of fairness and justice: A cross-cultural model. Risk Anal. 20 6 (2000) 905-916
22. Stenekes N., Livingstone D., Livingstone H.K., Waite T.D., and Ashbolt N.J. Sustainable water management in Australia: an institutional analysis. Proc. Good Water Governance for People and Nature: Water Roles for Law Institutions and Finance, Dundee, Scotland, August 29 - September 2 (2004)
23. Ryan R.L. Comparing the attitudes of local residents, planners and developers about preserving rural character in New England. Landscape Urban Plan. 75 102 (2006) 5-22
24. Schusler T.M., Decker D., and Pfeffer M.J. Social learning for collaborative natural resource management. Soc. Natur. Resour. 15 (2003) 309-326
25. Bandura A. Social Learning Theory (1971), General Learning Press, New York
26. Routhe A.S., Jones R.E., and Feldman D.L. Using theory to understand public support for collective actions that impact the environment: alleviating water supply problems in a nonarid biome. Soc. Sci. Quart. 86 4 (2005) 874-897