The limits of theoretical integration

Social Justice Research

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 270-287

  Wagner, David G ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36548998893     PISSN: 08857466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11211-007-0045-9     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
2. Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. H., & Wagner, D.G. (1985). The formation of reward expectations in status situations. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch Jr. (Eds.), Status, rewards and influence: How expectations organize behavior (pp. 215-261). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Berger, J., Wagner, D. G., & Zelditch Jr. M. (1989). Theory growth, social processes, and metatheory. In J. Turner (Ed.), Theory building in sociology (pp. 107-123). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Berger, J., Wagner, D. G., & Zelditch Jr. M. (1992). A working strategy for constructing theories: State organizing processes. In G. Ritzer (Eds.), Metatheorizing (pp. 19-42). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Berger, J., Zelditch Jr. M., Anderson, B., & Cohen, B. P. (1972). Structural aspects of distributive justice: A status value formulation. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch Jr. & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (Vol. 2, pp. 119-146). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
6. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7. Denzin, N. K. (1969). Symbolic interactionism and ethnomethodology. American Sociological Review, 34, 922-934.
8. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-149.
9. Hawley, A. (1950). Human ecology: A theory of community structure. New York: Ronald.
10. Hegtvedt, K. A. (2006). Justice frameworks. In P. Burke (Ed.). Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 46-69). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11. Hegtvedt, K. A., & Markovsky, B. (1995). Justice and injustice. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 256-280). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
12. Hogan, R., & Emler, N. P. (1981). Retributive justice. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 125-143). New York: Plenum.
13. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World [revised edition, 1974].
14. Jasso, G. (1978). On the justice of earnings: A new specification of the justice evaluation function. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 1398-1419.
15. Jasso, G. (1980). A new theory of distributive justice. American Sociological Review, 45, 3-32.
16. Jasso, G. (1990). Methods for the theoretical and empirical analysis of comparison processes. Sociological Methodology, 20, 369-419.
17. Jasso, G. (1998). Exploring the justice of punishments: Framing, expressiveness, and the just prison sentence. Social Justice Research, 11, 397-422.
18. Jasso, G. (1999). How much injustice is there in the world? Two new justice indexes. American Sociological Review, 64, 133-168.
19. Jasso, G. (2001). Formal theory. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 37-68). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
20. Kingsley, D. (1959). The myth of functional analysis. American Sociological Review, 24, 757-772.
21. Lane, I., & Messe, L. (1971). Equity and the distribution of rewards. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 1-17.
22. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
23. Merton, R. K. (1949). Manifest and latent functions. In R. K. Merton (Ed.), Social theory and social structure (pp. 21-81). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
24. Mikula, G. (1974). Nationality, performance and sex as determinants of reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 435-440.
25. Mikula, G. (1980). On the role of justice in allocation decisions. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice in Social Interaction (pp. 127-166). New York: Springer Verlag.
26. Miller, D. T., & Vidmark, N. (1981). The social psychology of punishment reactions. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 145-173). New York: Plenum.
27. Parsons, T. (1937). The structure of social action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
28. Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
29. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
30. Sampson, E. E. (1975). On justice as equality. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 45-64.
31. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975) Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Thye, S. (1999). Status influence and status value. In D. Willer (Ed.), Network exchange theory, (pp. 248-255). Westport, CT: Praeger.
33. Thye, S. (2000). A status value theory of power: Ratio level predictions for new exchange structures. American Sociological Review, 65, 407-432.
34. Törnblom, K. Y. (1988). Positive and negative allocations: A typology and a model for conflicting justice principles. In E. J. Lawler & B. Markvosky (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 5, pp. 141-168). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
35. Törnblom, K. Y. (1992). The social psychology of distributive justice. In K. R. Scherer (Ed.), Distributive justice from an interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 177-284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Törnblom, K. Y., & Jonsson, D. R. (1985). Subrules of the equality and contribution principles: Their perceived fairness in distribution and retribution. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 249-261.
37. Törnblom, K. Y., & Vermunt, R. (1998). The relationship between positive and negative outcome allocations and how they affect our justice conceptions. Social Justice Research, 11, 377-380.
38. Törnblom, K. Y., & Vermunt, R. (1999). An integrative perspective on social justice: Distributive vs. procedural fairness evaluations of positive and negative outcome allocations. Social Justice Research, 12, 37-61.
39. Wagner, D. G. (1995). Reward preferences in mixed-sex interaction. Small Groups Research, 26, 353-371.
40. Wagner, D. G. (2000). On the irrationality of rejecting falsified theories. Sociological Focus, 32, 27-39.
41. Wagner, D. G. (2006). Gender, status, and reward preference: An expectation states account. Manuscript under review.
42. Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 151-176.
43. Willer, D., Walker, H. A., Markovsky, B., Willer, R., Lovaglia, M., Thye, T., & Simpson, B. (2002) Network exchange theory. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch Jr. (Eds.), New directions in contemporary sociological theory (pp. 109-144). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
44. Zimmerman, D. H., & Wieder, D. L. (1970). Ethnomethodology and the problem of order: Comment on Denzin. In J. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding everyday life (pp. 285-298). Chicago: Aldine.