Stakeholder perspectives: CLIL programme management in Estonia

International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 683-701

  Mehisto, Peeter ^a   Asser, Hiie ^b  

^a Independent Management Consultant ^*  (Estonia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

Author keywords

CLIL; Estonia; Programme management; Stakeholder perspectives

Indexed keywords

EID: 36448996686     PISSN: 13670050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2167/beb466.0     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Arnau, J. (1998) Pedagogical approach, context and language learning in early Catalan immersion. In J. Arnau and J.M. Artigal (eds) Immersion Programmes a European Perspective (pp. 94-114). Barcelona: Publicacions de la Universitat de Barcelona.
2. Asser, H., Kolk, P. and Küppar, M. (2004) Eesti Keelekümblusprogramm:uurimisrühma aruanne 2003/04. Tallinn: Uurimisrühm.
3. Baetens Beardsmore, H. (2002) The Significance of CLIL/EMILE. In D. Marsh (ed.) CLILE/EMILE - The European Dimension. Actions Trends and Foresight Potential (pp. 24-26). Jyväskylä: UniCOM Continuing Education Centre.
4. Bendell, J. (2003) Talking for change? Reflections on effective stakeholder dialogue. In J. Andriof, S. Waddock, B. Husted and S. Sutherland Rahman (eds) Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking 2: Relationships, Communication, Reporting and Performance (pp. 53-69). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.
5. Clarkson, M.B.E. (1995) A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. The Academy of Management Review 20 (1), 887-910.
6. Cloud, N., Genesee, F. and Hamayan, E. (2000) Dual Language Instruction: A Handbook for Enriched Education. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
7. Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2000) Research Methods in Education (5th edn). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
8. Coyle, D. (2006) Content and Language Integrated Learning: Motivating Learners and Teachers. On WWW at http://www.scilt.stir.ac.uk/SLR/Issue%2013/ SLR13%20Coyle.pdf. Accessed 27.12.06.
9. European Language Portfolio (2000) On WWW at http://www.eelp.org/ eportfolio/eELP_Guided_Pathway_web_en_GB.pdf. Accessed 26.12.06.
10. Frosst, M. (ed.) (2004) L'immersion en français au Canada: Guide pratique d'enseignement. Nepean: l'Association canadienne des professeurs d'immersion.
11. st Century. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
12. Fullan, M. (2001) Leading in a Culture of Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Gajo, L. (2000) Immersion, bilinguisme et interaction scolaire. Paris: Didier.
14. Gajo, L. and Mondada, L. (2000) Interactions et acquisitions en contexte. Fribourg: Éditions Universtaires.
15. Gajo, L. and Serra, C. (2002) Bilingual teaching: Connecting language and concepts in mathematics. In D. So and G. Jones (eds) Education and Society in Plurilingual Contexts (pp. 75-95). Brussels: VUB Brussels University Press.
16. Gall, M.D., Gall, J.P. and Borg, W.R. (2003) Educational Research: An Introduction (7th edn). Boston: A and B.
17. Genesee, F. (2005) Second language immersion: A summary for teachers, administrators and parents. In R. McConnell (ed.) Immersion Handbook (pp. 5-26). Tallinn: Estonian Language Immersion Centre.
18. Harris, A. (2003) Introduction & The changing context of leadership: Research theory and practice & Teacher leadership and school improvement. In B. Davies and L. Ellison (eds) Effective Leadership for School Improvement (pp. 1-25, 72-83). New York: Routledge Falmer.
19. Hopkins, D. (2001) School Improvement for Real. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
20. Langé, G. (ed.) (2002) TIE-CLIL Professional Development Course. Milan: M.LU.R.
21. Lauren, C. (2000) Personal communication.
22. Lépineux, F. (2005) Stakeholder theory, society and social cohesion. Corporate Governance 5 (2), 99-110.
23. Lindholm, K.J. and Molina, R. (1998) Learning in dual language classrooms in the US: Implementation and evaluation outcomes. In J. Arnau and J.M. Artigal (eds) Immersion Programmes a European Perspective (pp. 707-717). Barcelona: Publicacions de la Universitat de Barcelona.
24. Lopez, E. and Kreider, H. (2003) Beyond input: Achieving authentic participation in school reform. The Evaluation Exchange 10 (2).
25. Lyster, R. (1998) Immersion pedagogy and implications for language teaching. In J. Cenoz and F. Genesee (eds) Beyond Multilingualism: Multilingualism and Multilingual Education (pp. 64-95). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
26. Lyster, R. (2004a) Research on form-focused instruction in immersion classrooms: Implications for theory and practice, Journal of French Language Studies 14, 321-341.
27. Lyster, R. and Mori, H. (2006) Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28, 321-341.
28. Marsh, D. (2002) CLIL/EMILE in Europe: Dimensions. In D. Marsh (ed.) CLILE/EMILE - The European Dimension. Actions Trends and Foresight Potential (pp. 65-88). Jyväskylä: UniCOM Continuing Education Centre.
29. Näsi, J. (2002) What is stakeholder thinking? A snapshot of a social theory of the firm. In J. Nasi (ed.) Understanding Stakeholder Thinking School of Business and Economics, 1995. 30. Reprint. (pp. 15-29). Helsinki: LSR-Publications.
30. Statistics Canada (2006) Back-to-school Factbook. On WWW at http://www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/81-004-XIE/2006003/backto.htm. Accessed 24.12.06.
31. Takala, S. (2002) Positioning CLIL in the wider context. In D. Marsh (ed.) CLILE/EMILE - The European Dimension. Actions Trends and Foresight Potential (pp. 40-42). Jyväskylä: UniCOM Continuing Education Centre.
32. The Nuffield Languages Inquiry (2000) Languages: The Next Generation. London: The Nuffield Foundation.
33. Wolff, D. (2002) On the importance of CLIL in the context of the debate on plurilingual education in the European Union. In D. Marsh (ed.) CLILE/EMILE - The European Dimension. Actions Trends and Foresight Potential (pp. 47-48). Jyväskylä: UniCOM Continuing Education Centre.