Image quality with multifocal intraocular lenses and the effect of pupil size. Comparison of refractive and hybrid refractive-diffractive designs

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 33, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 2111-2117

  Artigas, José M ^a   Menezo, José L ^a   Peris, Cristina ^a   Felipe, Adelina ^a   Díaz Llopis, Manuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIFFRACTION; EYE REFRACTION; IMAGE QUALITY; LENS IMPLANT; MULTIFOCAL LENS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPIL;

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OPTICS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PUPIL;

EID: 36448996631     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.07.035     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Kawamorita T., and Uozato H. Modulation transfer function and pupil size in multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses in vitro. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 2379-2385
2. Rawer R., Stork W., Spraul C.W., and Lingenfelder C. Imaging quality of intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 1618-1631
3. Altmann G.E., Nichamin L.D., Lane S.S., and Pepose J.S. Optical performance of 3 intraocular lens designs in the presence of decentration. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 574-585
4. Bennett A.G., and Rabbetts R.B. Clinical Visual Optics. 2nd ed. (1989), Butterworths, London, UK 54-67
5. Lorente A., Pons A.M., Malo J., and Artigas J.M. Standard criterion for fluctuations of modulation transfer function in the human eye: application to disposable contact lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 17 (1997) 267-272
6. British Standards Institute. Ophthalmic Implants-Intraocular Lenses-Part 2: Optical Properties and Test Methods (2000), BSI, London (EN/ISO 11979-2)
7. Tognetto D., Sanguinetti G., Sirotti P., et al. Analysis of the quality of intraocular lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 (2004) 2682-2690
8. Javitt J.C., and Steiner R.F. Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation; a multinational clinical trial evaluating clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes. Ophthalmology 107 (2000) 2040-2048
9. Shoji N., and Shimizu K. Clinical evaluation of a 5.5 mm three-zone refractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 22 (1996) 1097-1101
10. Leyland M., and Zinicola E. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery; a systematic review. Ophthalmology 110 (2003) 1789-1798
11. Kohnen T., Allen D., Boureau C., et al. European multicenter study of the Acrysof ReSTOR apodized diffractive intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 113 (2006) 578-584
12. Chiam P.J.T., Chan J.H., Aggarwal R.K., and Kasaby S. ReSTOR intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery: quality of vision. J Cataract Refract Surg 32 (2006) 1459-1463
13. Goodman J.W. Introduction to Fourier Optics. 2nd ed. (1996), McGraw-Hill, New York, NY 137-145
14. Aguilar M., Felipe A., and Artigas J.M. Coherence of light and visual acuity: the influence of the pupil. Atti Fond G Ronchi 41 (1986) 81-97
15. Charman W.N., Murray I.J., Nacer M., and O'Donoghue E.P. Theoretical and practical performance of a concentric bifocal intraocular implant lens. Vision Res 38 (1998) 2841-2853
16. Koch D.D., Samuelson S.W., Haft E.A., and Merin L.M. Pupillary size and responsiveness: implications for selection of a bifocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 98 (1991) 1030-1035
17. Ravalico G., Baccara F., and Bellavitis A. Refractive bifocal intraocular lens and pupillary diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg 18 (1992) 594-597
18. Hayashi K., Hayashi H., Nakao F., and Hayashi F. Correlation between pupillary size and intraocular lens decentration and visual acuity of a zonal-progressive multifocal lens and a monofocal lens. Ophthalmology 108 (2001) 2011-2017
19. British Standards Institute. Optics and Optical Instruments. Optical Transfer Function. Definitions and Mathematical Relationships (1995), BSI, London (EN/ISO 9334)
20. British Standards Institute. Optics and Optical Instruments. Optical Transfer Functions. Principles and Procedures of Measurements (1995), BSI, London (EN/ISO 9335)
21. Pieh S., Marvan P., Lackner B., et al. Quantitative performance of bifocal and multifocal intraocular lenses in a model eye; point spread function in multifocal intraocular lenses. Arch Ophthalmol 120 (2002) 23-28
22. Souza C.E., Muccioli C., Soriano E.S., et al. Visual performance of AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive IOL: a prospective comparative trial. Am J Ophthalmol 141 (2006) 827-832
23. Weghaupt H., Pieh S., and Skorpik C. Comparison of pseudoaccommodation and visual quality between a diffractive and refractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 24 (1998) 663-665
24. Vaquero-Ruano M., Encinas J.L., Millan I., et al. AMO Array multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses: long-term follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 24 (1998) 118-123