Theoretical and practical performance of a concentric bifocal intraocular implant lens

Vision Research

Volumn 38, Issue 18, 1998, Pages 2841-2853

  Charman, W N ^a   Murray, I J ^a   Nacer, M ^a   O'Donoghue, E P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b MANCHESTER ROYAL EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Alignment; Contrast sensitivity function; Intra ocular lens; Practical; Theoretical

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIFOCAL LENS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HUMAN; LENS DISEASE; LENS IMPLANT; MODULATION TRANSFER FUNCTION; OPTICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA IMAGE; VISUAL ACUITY;

AGED; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 0031854032     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00447-1     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Percival S.P.B., Yousef K.M. Treatment of unilateral aphakia. Br J Ophthalmol. 60:1976;642-644.
2. Nakazawa M., Ohksuki K. Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 96:1983;435-438.
3. Tucker J., Rabie E.P. Depth-of-focus of the pseudophakic eye. Br J Physiol Opt. 34:1980;12-21.
4. Nakazawa M., Ohtsuki K. Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses: optical analysis. Invest Ophthalmol. 25:1984;1458-1460.
5. Huber C. Myopic astigmatism: a substitute for accommodation in pseudophakia. Doc Ophthalmol. 52:1981;123-178.
6. Datiles M.B., Gancayco T. Low myopia with low astigmatic correction gives cataract surgery patients good depth-of-focus. Ophthalmology. 97:1990;922-966.
7. Boerner C.F., Thrasher B.H. Results of monovision correction in bilateral pseudophakes. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc. 10:1984;49-50.
8. Eisenmann D., Ruckmann A., Jacobi K.W. Optical performance of asymmetrical refractive multifocal IOLs. Ophthalmic and Visual Optics, Monterey, February 19-23, 1993. Technical Digest Series. 3:1993;30-33 Optical Society of America, Washington.
9. Pearce J.L. Mutlifocal intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 8:1997;2-5.
10. Klein S., Ho Z. Multizone bifocal contact lens design. Soc Photo-Optical Instr Eng. 679:1986;23-35.
11. Charman W.N., Saunders B. Theoretical and practical factors influencing the optical performance of contact lenses for the presbyope. J Br Contact Lens Ass. 13:1990;67-75.
12. Bennett A.G., Rabbetts R.B. Clinical Visual Optics. 1984;Butterworths, London.
13. Stiles W.S., Crawford B.H. The luminous efficiency of rays entering the eye pupil at different points. Proc R Soc Lond. B112:1933;428-450.
14. Hopkins H.H. Geometrical optical treatment of frequency response. Proc Phys Soc B. 70:1957;1162-1172.
15. Fry G.A. The optical performance of the human eye. Wolf E. Progress in Optics. 8:1970;53-131 North Holland, Amsterdam.
16. Charman W.N., Jennings J.A.M. The optical quality of the monochromatic retinal image as a function of focus. Br J Physiol Opt. 31:1976;119-134.
17. Smith G. Ocular defocus, spurious resolution and contrast reversal. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2:1982;5-23.
18. O'Neill E.L. Transfer function for an annular aperture. J Opt Soc Am. 46:1956;285-288.
19. Linfoot E.H. Image quality and optical resolution. Opt Acta. 4:1957;12-16.
20. Barakat R., Houston A. Transfer function of an annular aperture in the presence of spherical aberration. J Opt Soc A. 55:1965;538-541.
21. Akutsu H., Legge G.E., Showalter M., Lindstrom R.L., Zabel R.W., Kirby V.M. Contrast sensitivity and reading through multifocal intraocular lenses. Arch Ophthalmol. 110:1992;1076-1080.
22. Ginsburg A new contrast sensitivity vision test chart. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 61:1978;403-407.
23. Owsley C., Sekuler R., Shemsen D. Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood. Vis Res. 23:1983;689-699.
24. Derefeldt F.D., Lennerstrand G., Lundh B. Age variations in normal human contrast sensitivity. Acta Ophthalmol. 57:1979;679-690.
25. Morrison J.D., McGrath C. Assessment of the optical contributions to age-related deterioration in vision. Q J Exp Psychol. 70:1985;249-269.
26. Tulaney-Keesey U., Ver Hoeve J.N., Terkla-McGrane C. Threshold and suprathreshold spatiotemporal response throughout adulthood. J Opt Soc Am. A5:1988;2191-2200.
27. Higgins K.E., Jaffe M.J., Caruso R.C., de Monasterio F.M. Spatial contrast sensitivity: effects of age, test-retest, and psychophysical method. J Opt Soc Am. A5:1988;2173-2180.
28. Sloane M.E., Owsley C., Jackson C.A. Aging and luminance-adaptation effects on spatial contrast sensitivity. J Opt Soc Am. A5:1988;2181-2190.
29. Sloane M.E., Owsley C., Alvarez S.L. Aging, senile miosis and spatial contrast sensitivity at low luminance. Vis Res. 28:1988;1235-1246.
30. Kulikowski J.J. Some stimulus parameters affecting spatial and temporal resolution in human vision. Vis Res. 11:1971;83-93.
31. Regan D., Neima D. Low-contrast letter charts as a test of visual function. Ophthalmology. 90:1983;1193-1200.
32. Georgeson M., Sullivan G.D. Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels. J Physiol (Lond). 252:1975;627-656.
33. Kulikowski J.J. Effective contrast constancy and linearity of contrast sensation. Vis Res. 16:1976;1419-1431.
34. Walsh G., Charman W.N. The subjective sensitivity to small changes in the contrast of a suprathreshold grating. Vis Res. 30:1990;163-173.
35. Post C.T. Comparison of depth-of-focus and low-contrast acuities for monofocal versus multifocal intraocular lens patients at 1 year. Ophthalmology. 99:1992;1658-1664.
36. Steinert R.F., Post C.T., Brint S.F. et al. A prospective, randomized, double-masked comparison of a zonal-progressive multifocal intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology. 99:1992;853-861.
37. Van Nes F.L., Koenderink J.J., Nas H., Bouman M.A. Spatiotemporal modulation transfer in the human eye. J Opt Soc Am. 57:1968;1082-1088.
38. Olsen T., Corydon L. Contrast sensitivity as function of focus in patients with the diffractive intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 16:1990;703-706.
39. Lehmann R.P. Paired comparison of contrast sensitivity in diffractive multifocal IOLs. Aust New Zealand J Ophthalmol. 18:1990;325-328.
40. Jay J.L., Chakrabarti H.S., Morrison J.D. Quality of vision through diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses. Br J Ophthalmol. 75:1991;359-366.
41. Gimbel H.V., Sanders D.R., Ranaan M.G. Visual and refractive results of multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology. 98:1991;881-888.
42. Akutsu H., Legge G.E., Luebker A., Lindstrom R.L., Zabel R.W., Kirby V.M. Multifocal intraocular lenses and glare. Optom Vis Sci. 70:1993;487-495.
43. Zisser H.C., Guyton D.L. Photographic simulation of image quality through bifocal intraocular lenses (letter). Am J Ophthalmol. 108:1989;324-326.
44. Holladay J.T., van Dijk H., Lang A., Portney V., Willis T.R., Sun R., Oksman H.C. Optical performance of multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 16:1990;413-422.
45. Atebara N.H., Miller D. An optical model to describe image contrast with bifocal intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 110:1990;172-177.
46. Simpson M.J. Diffractive multifocal intraocular lens image quality. Appl Opt. 31:1992;3621-3626.
47. Artal P., Marcos S., Navarro R., Miranda I., Ferro M. Through focus image quality of eyes implanted with monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses. Optic Eng. 34:1995;772-779.
48. Dahner C., Larsson M., Nyström A., Hård S. Letter imaging by diffractive, bifocal intraocular lenses: a computer study. Appl Opt. 33:1994;1135-1140.
49. Navarro R., Ferro M., Artal P., Miranda I. Modulation transfer functions of eyes implanted with intraocular lenses. Appl Opt. 32:1993;6359-6367.
50. Erickson P., Schor C. Visual function with presbyopic contact lens correction. Optom Vis Sci. 67:1990;22-28.
51. Schor C., Landsman L., Erickson P. Ocular dominance and the interocular suppression of blur in monovision. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 64:1987;723-730.