Erratum: Do realistic reverberation levels reduce auditory distraction? (Applied Cognitive Psychology 10.1002/acp.1300);Do realistic reverberation levels reduce auditory distraction?

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 839-847

  Perham, Nick ^a   Banbury, Simon ^a   Jones, Dylan M ^a,b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY MEMORY; AUDITORY RESPONSE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEARING ACUITY; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INDUSTRIAL NOISE; NOISE MEASUREMENT; NOISE REDUCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESPONSE TIME; SOUND INTENSITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORK ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 36448976944     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1369     Document Type: Erratum

References (34)

1. Aspinwall, L. G., & Taylor, S. E. (1992). Modeling cognitive adaptation: A longitudinal investigation of the impact of individual differences and coping on college adjustment and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 989-1003.
2. Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Human memory. Hove, East Sussex: Erlbaum.
3. Banbury, S., & Berry, D. C. (1997). Habituation and dishabituation to speech and office noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 181-195.
4. Banbury, S., & Berry, D. C. (1998). The disruption of office-related tasks by speech and office noise. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 285-295.
5. Banbury, S., Macken, W. J, Tremblay, S., & Jones, D. M. (2001). Auditory distraction and short-term memory: Phenomena and practical implications. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society, 43, 12-29.
6. Beaman, C. P. (2005). Auditory distraction from low-intensity noise: A review of the consequences for learning and workplace environments. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1041-1064.
7. Beaman, C. E, & Holt, N. J. (2006). Auditory distraction is reduced by reverberation: The effect of multiple echoes on irrelevant speech. Manuscript submitted for publication.
8. Begg, D. (2001). Call centres and acoustic shock. Retrieved January 12, 2004, from http://www.middletons.com.au/_site/inprint/PDF/ Dec01o_acustic_shock.PDF.
9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences ( 2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Colle, H. A. (1980). Auditory encoding in visual short-term recall: Effects of noise intensity and spatial location. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 722-735.
11. Crowder, R. G. (1976). Principles of learning and memory, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
12. Ellermeier, W., & Hellbrück, J. (1998). Is level irrelevant in "irrelevant speech"? Effects of loudness, signal-to-noise ratio, and binaural masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1406-1414.
13. Evans, G. W., & Johnson, J. (2000). Stress and open office noise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 779-783.
14. Estrada, C. A, Isen, A. M., & Young, M. J. (1997). Positive-affect improves creating problem solving and influences reported source of practice satisfaction in physicians. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 285-299.
15. Henson, R. N. A. (1998). Short-term memory for serial order: The Start-End model. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 73-137.
16. Isen, A. M. (1993). Positive-affect and decision making. In M. Lewis, & J. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 261-277). New York: Guilford Press.
17. Jones, D. M. (1999). The cognitive psychology of auditory distraction: The 1997 BPS Broadbent Lecture. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 167-187.
18. Jones, D. M., Alford, D., Macken, W. J., Banbury, S., & Tremblay, S. (2000). Interference from auditory degraded stimuli: Linear affects of stimulus mismatch in the irrelevant sequence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 1082-1088.
19. Jones, D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1993). Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: Implications for phonological coding in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 369-381.
20. Jones, D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1995). Auditory babble and cognitive efficiency: Role of number and voices and their location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 216-226.
21. Kjellberg, A., & Landstrom, U. (1994). Noise in the office: Part II - The scientific basis (knowledge base) for the guide. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 14, 93-118.
22. Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behaviour. In L. A. Jeffres (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behaviour: The Hixon Symposium (pp. 112-146). New York: Wiley.
23. Marsh, J., Hughes, R. W., & Jones, D. M. (2006). Auditory distraction at the interface of episodic and semantic memory: A passive or dynamic process? Manuscript in preparation.
24. McSquared System Design Group, Inc. (n.d.). So why does reverberation affect speech intelligibility? Retrieved August 18, 2005, from http://www.mcsquared.com/index.htm.
25. Nemecek, J., & Grandjean, E. (1973). Noise in landscaped offices. Applied Ergonomics, 4, 19-22.
26. Oswald, C. J. P., Tremblay, S., & Jones, D. M. (2000). Disruption of comprehension by the meaning of irrelevant sound. Memory, 8, 345-350.
27. Perham, N., Banbury, S., & Jones, D. M. (2004). The susceptibility of a call center-like task to disruption by extraneous sound: The role of semantic relatedness. Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica, CA: HFES.
28. Perham, N., Banbury, S., & Jones, D. M. (2005). Auditory distraction impairs analytical reasoning performance In M. Katsikitis (Ed.), Past Reflections, Future Directions: Proceedings of the 40th Australian Psychological Society Annual Conference, Melbourne, Australia (pp. 238-242).
29. Pilkington, E. (1995). 'Buildings of future returning to nature', The Guardian, April 1st, p. 2.
30. Roman, M. I. (2002). New acoustical standards for classrooms. Retrieved 16 August, 2005, from http://www.mbinet.org/web/magazine/ pm10_02.html.
31. Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 606-621.
32. Shea, S. M., Chur, K. C., & McBride, M. E. (2003). Architectural barriers to normalization: The acoustic environment of group homes. Retrieved March 31, 2005, from State University of New York at Buffalo, Center for Assistive Technology/IDEA Center Web Site: http://idea.ap.buffalo.edu/publicafions/ArchitecturalBarriers.htm.
33. Sonare Technologies. (2006). Babble. Retrieved July 11, 2006, from http://www.sonaretechnologies.com/Sonare3/products/privacy/phonebabble/ ProductStory.jsp.
34. Tremblay, S., & Jones, D. M. (1999). Change of intensity fails to produce an irrelevant sound effect: Implications for the representation of unattended sound. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1005-1015.