Cross-media publishing by U.S. newspapers

Journal of Electronic Publishing

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2007, Pages

  Veglis, Andreas ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36448962736     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10802711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3998/3336451.0010.211     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. ACTeN (2004). Cross-media E-Content Report 8.
2. Antikainen, H., S. Kangas, S. Vainikainen. 2004. Three views on mobile cross media entertainment. VTT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, RESEARCH REPORT TTE4-2004-17, 22.3.2004.
3. Appelgren, E. 2005. The influence of media convergence on strategies in newspaper production, PhD thesis Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm (June 2005). Available at http://www.csc.kth.se/utbildning/forskar/ avhandlingar/ lic/2005_2006/AppelgrenEster.lic.pdf.
4. Atwood, B. 1999. The wow and now of webcasting. Billboard, 111 (29):82.
5. Avraam, E. and A. Pomportsis, 2005. Implementing Distributed Printing in newspaper organizations: Case studies and recommendations. Transactions on Information Science and Applications, 10.2 (October 2005): 1523-1534.
6. Bartlett, D. 1994. The Soul of a News Machine: Electronic Journalism in the Twenty-First Century. Federal Communications Law Journal, Vol. 47, No, 1. Available at http://www.law.indiana.edu/fclj/pubs/v47/no1/bartlett.html.
7. Budde, N. 2001. 2001. Wireless Internet News: Another Challenge for Newspaper Publishers. In Future of Print Media /0wraa/.http://www. futureprint.kent.edu/ articles/budde02.htm.
8. Chisholm, J. 2002. The Distribution Revolution, Shaping the Future of the Newspaper. Strategy Report, Volume 2, Report No. 1, December 2002, WAN.
9. Consumer Reports Web Watch. 2005. Leap of Faith: Using the Internet Despite the Dangers, October 26, 2005. Available at http://www.consumerWebwatch. org/ pdfs/princeton.pdf.
10. Demers, D. 1998. Structural Pluralism, Corporate Newspaper Structure, and News source Perceptions: another Test of Editorial Vigor Hypothesis. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 75, no.3:572-592.
11. Duran, M. 2003. Tablet PCs hard to swallow for newspapers. Newspapers \& Technology. February, available at http://www.newsandtech.com/issues/ 2003/02-03/ot/02-03_tablet.htm.
12. Edwards, S. 2002. Alternative Distribution Methods for Newspapers. The Seybold Report, Analyzing Publishing Technologies, November 11 2002.
13. Enlund, N. 1996. The Impact of New Information Technologies and Infrastructure on the Publishing Industry. In Printed Media in Transition, The Economic Research Foundation for Mass Communication, Turku School of Business Administration, Business Research and Development Centre, Media Group, 25-35.
14. Enlund, N. 1979. Toward the multi-media newspaper. In "Teleinformatics 1979 '79", International. Conference IFIP. Edited by E.J Boutmy and A. Danthirie. North-Holland Publishing Company Amsterdam, Holland, 49-53.
15. Eriksen, L. B. 1997. Digital Documents, Work and Technology, three cases of Internet News Publishing. Proceedings of The Thirtieth Annual Hawwaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE.
16. Fidler, R. 1998. Life After 2001: Redefining Print Media In the Cyber Age, In Future of Print Media Journal. http://www.futureprint.kent.edu/ articles/fidler01. htm.
17. Gillmor, D. 2004. We the Media - Grassroots Journalism by the People, for the People, O'Reilly.
18. Greer, J. and D. Mensing. 2004. U.S. News Web Sites Better, But Small Papers Still Lag. Newspaper Research Journal, Vol. 25, Spring 2004, No. 2:98-112.
19. Griffin, J. and R. Stevenson. 1992. Influence of Text and Graphics in Increasing Understanding of Foreign Language News Contexts. Newspaper Research Journal 13 (Winter 1992):84-98.
20. Ha, J. Y., S. Dick, S. K. Ryu. 2003. Broadcast Via the Internet: Technolog, Market, and the Future. Trends in Communications 11(2): 155-168.
21. Kaitatzi Whitlock, S. and A. Veglis. 2006. Webcasting and Interactive Practices in two European Countries: Greece and the UK. Presented at the COST-A20 Conference Impact of Internet on the Mass Media in Europe 2006.
22. Karnitschnig, M. and S. Ellison. 2006. Time Inc. Picks its Web Winners - And Its Flagship Isn't One. The Wall Street Journal October 30, 2006.
23. Käpylä, T., I. Niemi, and A. Lehtola. 1998. Towards an Accessible Web by Applying PUSH Technology. 4th ERCIM Workshop on "User Interfaces for All" Special Theme "Towards an Accessible Web" Stockholm, Sweden, 19-21 October 1998. Available at http://ui4all.ics.forth.gr/ UI4ALL-98/kapyla.pdf.
24. Kenney, K., A. Gorelik and S. Mwangi. 2000. Interactive Features of Online Newspapers. First Monday, January 2000, volume 5, number 1. Available Ut http:// firstmonday.org/issues/issue5_l/kenney/index.html.
25. Levins, H. 1997. Time of change and challenge. Editor & Publisher, 4 January 1997, 58.
26. Lowrey, W. 2003. What Influences Small Newspapers To Decide To Publish Online News? Newspaper Research Journal, Summer 2003, Vol. 24, No. 3:83-90.
27. McCleneghan, J. S. 1997. Searching for 'Analysis' in the Southwest: AM vs. PM Newspapers in Four 'Fire Zones'. Social Science Journal 34, no. 1: 21-33.
28. Molina, A. 1998. The European Community's NewsPAD Project. Future of Print Media Journal, Summer 1998. Available at http://www.futureprint.kent. edu/ articles/molina01 .htm.
29. Negroponte, N. 1995. Being Digital, Athens: Kastaniotis.
30. Nguyen, A. and M.Western. 2006. The complementary relationship between the Internet and traditional mass media: the case of online news and information. Information Research, 11(3) paper 259. Available at http://InformationR.nct/ir/113/paper259.html
31. Northrup, K. 2001. Finding a happy medium for handling multiple media. Newspaper Techniques, English edition, January 2001, 12-16.
32. Phillips, P. 2006.1 Want Media, (07/18/06). Available at http://www.iwantmedia. com/people/people59.html
33. Pew Research Center for the People and The Press. 2005a. Public More Critical of Press, But Goodwill Persists. June 26 2005. Available at http://people-press.org/ reports/pdf/248.pdf.
34. Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. 2005b. Alito Viewed Positively, But Libby Takes a Toll. November 8, 2005. Available at: http://people-press.org/ reports/display.php3?ReportID=262.
35. The Pew Internet and American Life Project. 2006. These numbers come from the "Usage Over Time" spreadsheet, 2006. Available at http://www.pewlnternet.org/ trends/UsageOverTime.xls
36. Randazzo, R. and Greer, J. 2003. Newspapers' Web Sites Add Little To Print Version on Environmental News. Newspaper Research Journal Spring 2003, Vol. 24, No. 2:120-124.
37. Rosenberg, J. 2002. The Tablet PC's Implications For Newspapers. Editor ¡& Publisher. December 17, 2002. Available at http://www.mediainfo.com/eandp/ news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1778926.
38. Sabelström, K. 2001. Information Categories and Editorial Process in Multiple channel publishing. Phd Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of NADA, Division of Media Technology and Graphics Arts, Stockholm, Sweden Sabelström, K. 2000. The Multimedia News Reporter: Technology and Work Processes. Presented at TAGA'S 52nd Annual Technical Conference, April, Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA, published in TAGA 2000 Proceedings, TAGA Office, Rochester, New York, USA, 53-66.
39. Sabelström, K., N. Enlund. 1999. Newspaper Premedia Workflows for Parallel Publishing. Paper presented at ticgc - Taipei International Conference on Graphic Communications, Taipei, Taiwan, October 1999.
40. Sabelström, K. 1998. Consumer Needs and Competing Products in Printing and Publishing. Proceedings of the 98 Conference "Beyond Convergence", Stockholm, Sweden, June 1998.
41. Sabelström, K., S. Nordqvist, and N. Enlund. 1997. Synergy in Integrated Publishing of Printed and Electronic Newspapers. Paper presented at IARIGAI 24th International Research Conference, London, UK, September 1997. Published in «Advances in Printing Science and Technology», vol. 24, Bristow, A. (ed.), Pira International.
42. Schiff, F. 2003. Business models of news Web sites: A survey of empirical trends and expert opinion. First Monday, volume 8, number 6, June 2003. Available at http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue8_6/schiff/index.html.
43. Stempel III, G. and T. Hargrove. 2003. Despite Gains, Internet Not Major Player as News Source. Newspaper Research Journal, Vol. 25, Spring 2003, No. 2:113-115.
44. Spyridou, P. and A.Veglis. 2006. Online Newspapers in Greece: the Evolution of a Digital Genre. Presented in COST-A20 2006 Conference, Impact of Internet on the Mass Media in Europe.
45. Spyridou, P. and A. Veglis. 2003. E-papers in Greece: Living Up to their Potential. 1st LSE PhD Symposium on Modern Greece: "Current Social Science Research on Greece" London School of Economics, June 21, 2003.
46. The State of the New Media 2006. 2006. An Annual Report on American Journalism. Available at http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2006/ narrative_online_intro.asp?cat= 1&media=4.
47. Tenenbaum, D. 1997. Writing for the Web. SE Journal 7 (Summer 1997):
48. Van der Heijden, M. and M. Taylor. 2000. Understanding WAP. Artech House.
49. Veglis, A. 2005. Implementation of a Computer Supported Collaborative Work System in a newspaper. WSEAS Trasnactions on Information Science and Applications, Issue 7, July 2005, Volume 2:891-902.
50. Walter, M. 1999. Cross-Media Publishing Systems. The Seybold Report on Internet Publishing October 1999.
51. Wearden, S. and R. Fidler. 2001. Crain's Cleveland Business: Evaluating an eNewspaper Concept for Tablet PCs. Future of Print Media Journal, Spring 2001. Available at http://www.futureprint.kent.edu/articles/wearden03. htm.
52. WAN - World Association of Newspapers. 2005. World Press Trends.