On the radiobiological impact of metal artifacts in head-and-neck IMRT in terms of tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP)

Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing

Volumn 45, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1045-1051

  Kim, Yusung ^a   Tomé, Wolfgang A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Head and neck cancer; Metal artifacts; NTCP; TCP; Treatment planning

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; PATIENT TREATMENT; PROBABILITY; RADIOTHERAPY; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TUMORS;

HEAD CANCER; METAL ARTIFACTS; NECK CANCER; NORMAL TISSUE COMPLICATION PROBABILITY (NTCP); RADIOBIOLOGICAL IMPACT; TUMOR CONTROL PROBABILITY (TCP);

ONCOLOGY;

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; METAL;

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; CANCER CONTROL; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEAD AND NECK CANCER; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTENSITY MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PAROTID GLAND; PROBABILITY; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTION; RADIATION FIELD; RADIOBIOLOGY; SPINAL CORD; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ARTIFACTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS; HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; METALS; RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOTHERAPY, INTENSITY-MODULATED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 36448955360     PISSN: 01400118     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-007-0196-8     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bal M, Spies L (2006) Metal artifact reduction in CT using tissue-class modeling and adaptive prefiltering. Med Phys 33:2852-2859
2. Bentzen SM (2002) Dose-response relationships in radiotherapy. In: Steel GG (ed) Basic clinical radiobiology. Hodder Arnold, Great Britain, pp 94-104
3. Bentzen SM, Thames HD (1996) Tumor volume and local control probability: clinical and radiobiological interpretations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 36:247-251
4. Burman C, Kutcher GJ, Emami B, Goitein M (1991) Fitting of normal tissue tolerance data to an analytic function. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21:129-135
5. Eisbruch A, Ship JA, Martel MK et al (1996) Parotid gland sparing in patients undergoing bilateral head and neck irradiation: Techniques and early results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol 30(2):469-480
6. Eisbruch A, Ten Haken RK, Kim HM, Marsh LH, Ship JA (1999) Dose, volume, and function relationships in parotid salivary glands following conformal and intensity-modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol 45(3):577-587
7. Evans RD (1985) The atomic nucleus, reprint edition 1982 of 14th printing 1972. Krieger Malabar, Florida, USA
8. Fenwick JD (1998) Predicting the radiation control probability of heterogeneous tumor ensembles: Data analysis and parameter estimation using a closed-form expression. Phys Med Biol 43:2159-2178
9. Fenwick JD, Tomé WA, Soisson ET, Mehta MP, Mackie TR (2006) Tomotherapy and other innovative IMRT delivery systems. Semin Radiat Oncol 16:199-208
10. Goitein M (1987) The probability of controlling an inhomogeneously irradiated tumor. In: Zink S (ed) Report of the working group on the evaluation of treatment planning for particle beam radiotherapy. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
11. Goitein M, Niemierko A, Okunieff P (1995) In: Kaulner K, Carey B, Crellin A, Harrison RM, (eds) Quantitative imaging in oncology. In: Proceedings of the 19th LH gray conference, Br Inst Radiol., London, pp 25-32
12. Holthusen H (1936) Erfahrungen über die Verträglichkeitsgrenze für Röntgenstrahlen und deren Nutzanwendung zur Verhütung von Schäden. Strahlentherapie 57:254-269
13. Hong TS, Tomé WA, Chappell RJ et al (2005) The impact of daily setup variations on head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61(3):779-788
14. Kim Y, Tomü WA (2006) Risk-adaptive optimization: Selective boosting of high-risk tumor subvolumes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66:1528-1542
15. Kim Y, Tomü WA, Matthieu B, Todd RM, Lothar S (2006) The impact of dental metal artifacts on head and neck IMRT dose distributions. Radiother Oncol 79:198-202
16. Kutcher GJ, Burman C (1989) Calculation of complication probability factors for non-uniform normal tissue irradiation: The effective volume method. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 16:1623-1630
17. Langen KM, Meeks SL, Poole DO, et al (2005) The use of megavoltage CT (MVCT) images for dose recomputations. Phys Med Biol 50:4259-4279
18. Lyman JT (1985) Complication probability-as assessed from dose-volume histograms. Radiat Res 104:S13-S19
19. Marks JE, Bedwinek JM, Lee F, Purdy JA, Perez CA (1982) Dose-response analysis for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An historical perspective. Cancer 50:1042-1050
20. Munro TR, Gilbert CW (1961) The relation between tumour lethal doses and the radiosensitivity of tumour cells. Br J Radiol 34:246-251
21. Nahum AE, Tait DM (1992) Maximizing local control by customized dose prescription for pelvic tumours. In: Breit A (ed) Adv. radiation therapy response monitoring and treatment planning. Springer, Berlin, pp 425-431
22. Niemierko A, Goitein M (1993) Implementation of a model for estimating tumor control probability for an inhomogeneously irradiated tumor. Radiother Oncol 29:140-147
23. Okunieff P, Morgan D, Niemierko A et al (1995) Radiation dose-response of human tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32:1227-1237
24. Olive CS, Kaus MR, Pekar V et al (2004) Segmentation-aided adaptive filtering for metal artifacts reduction in radio-therapeutic CT images. Proc of SPIE 5370:1991-2002
25. Orton NP, Tomü WA (2004) The impact of daily shifts on prostate IMRT dose distributions. Med Phys 31(10):2845-2848
26. Popple RA, Ove R, Shen S (2002) Tumor control probability models for selective boosting of hypoxic subvolumes, including the effect of reoxygenation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 54:921-927
27. Roesink JM, Moerland MA, Battermann JJ et al (2001) Quantitative dose-volume response analysis of changes in parotid gland function after radiotherapy in the head-and-neck region. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51:938-946
28. Shepard DM, Olivera GH, Reckwerdt PJ, Mackie TR (2000) Iterative approaches to dose optimization in tomotherapy. Phys Med Biol 45:69-90
29. Suit HD, Shalek RJ, Wette R (1965) Radiation response of C3H mouse mammary carcinoma evaluated in terms of cellular radiation sensitivity. In: Cellular radiation biology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 514-530
30. Suit H, Skates S, Taghain A, Okunieff P, Efird JT (1992) Clinical implications of heterogeneity of tumor response to radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol 25:251-260
31. Tomü WA, Fowler JF (2002) On cold spots in tumor subvolumes. Med Phys 29:1590-1598
32. Tomü WA, Fowler JF (2003) On the inclusion of the proliferation term into tumour control probability calculations for inhomogeneously irradiated tumours. Phys Med Biol 48:N261-N268
33. Tomü WA, Meeks SL, McNutt RT, Buatti JM, Bova FJ, Friedman WA, Mehta M (2001) Radiother Oncol 61:33-44
34. Vannier MW, Hildebolt CF, Conover G, Knapp RH, Yokoyama-Crothers N, Wang G (1997) Three-dimensional dental imaging by spiral CT. A progress report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 84:561-570
35. Vikram B, Mishra UB, Strong EW, Manolatos S (1985) Patterns of failure in carcinoma of the nasopharynx: I. Failure at the primary site. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 11:1455-1459
36. Watzke O, Kalender WA (2004) A pragmatic approach to metal artifacts reduction in CT: Merging of metal artifacts reduced images. Eur Radiol 14:849-856
37. Webb S, Nahum AE (1993) The biological effect of inhomogeneous tumor irradiation with inhomogeneous clonogenic cell density. Phys Med Biol 38:653-666
38. Zagras GK, Shultheiss TE, Peters LJ (1987) Inter-tumour heterogeneity and radiation dose control curves. Radiother Oncol 8:353-362