A psychometric evaluation of the approach and avoidance of alcohol questionnaire (AAAQ) in alcohol dependent outpatients

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 231-240

  Klein, Audrey A ^a   Stasiewicz, Paul R ^a   Koutsky, James R ^a   Bradizza, Clara M ^a   Coffey, Scott F ^b  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE ON ADDICTIONS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Alcohol; Assessment; Craving; Cue reactivity; Validity

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ALCOHOLISM; APPROACH AND AVOIDANCE OF ALCOHOL QUESTIONNAIRE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

EID: 36448931991     PISSN: 08822689     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10862-007-9044-2     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Anton, R. F. (1999). What is craving? Models and implications for treatment. Alcohol Research and Health, 23, 165-173.
2. Beck, A. T., Brown, G. K., & Steer, R. A. (1996). Beck depression inventory-II (BDI-II). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
3. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 57, 289-300.
4. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
5. Bernstein, I. H., & Teng, G. (1989). Factoring items and factoring scales are different: Spurious evidence for multidimensionality due to item categorization. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 467-477.
6. Blouin, A. G., Perez, E. L., & Blouin, J. H. (1988). Computerized administration of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Psychiatry Research, 23, 335-344.
7. Breiner, M. J., Stritzke, W. G., & Lang, A. R. (1999). Approaching avoidance: A step essential to the understanding of craving. Alcohol Research & Health, 23, 197-206.
8. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 132-162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Coffey, S. F., Saladin, M. E., Libet, J. M., Drobes, D. J., & Dansky, B. S. (1999). Differential urge and salivary responsivity to alcohol cues in alcohol-dependent patients: A comparison of traditional and stringent classification approaches. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 7, 464-472.
10. Collins, B. N., & Brandon, T. H. (2002). Effects of extinction context and retrieval cues on alcohol cue reactivity among nonalcoholic drinkers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 390-397.
11. Erdman, H. P., Klein, M. H., Greist, J. H., Skare, S. S., Husted, J. J., Robins, L. N., et al. (1992). A comparison of two computer-administered versions of the NIMH diagnostic interview schedule. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 26, 85-95.
12. Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2000). Unrestricted versus restricted factor analysis of multidimensional test items: Some aspects of the problem and some suggestions. Psicológica, 21, 301-323.
13. Franken, I. H. A., De Haan, H. A., Van Der Meer, C. W., Haffmans, P. M. J., & Hendriks, V. M. (1999). Cue reactivity and effects of cue exposure in abstinent post-treatment drug users. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 16, 81-85.
14. Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrica, 30, 179-185.
15. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
16. Kozlowski, L. T., Mann, R. E., Wilkinson, D. A., & Poulos, C. X. (1989). "Cravings" are ambiguous: Ask about urges or desires. Addictive Behaviors, 14, 443-445.
17. Kozlowski, L. T., Pilliterri, J. L., Sweeney, C. T., Whitfield, K. E., & Graham, J. W. (1996). Asking questions about urges or cravings for cigarettes. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 10, 248-260.
18. Kozlowski, L. T., & Wilkinson, D. A. (1987). Use and misuse of the concept of craving by alcohol, tobacco, and drug researchers. British Journal of Addiction, 82, 31-36.
19. Leigh, B. C., & Stacy, A. (1993). Alcohol outcome expectancies: Scale construction and predictive utility in higher order confirmatory models. Psychological Assessment, 5, 216-229.
20. Levitan, R. D., Blouin, A. G., Navarro, J. R., & Hill, J. (1991). Validity of the computerized DIS for diagnosing psychiatric inpatients. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 728-731.
21. McEvoy, P. M., Stritzke, W. G., French, D. J., Lang, A. R., & Ketterman, R. L. (2004). Comparison of three models of alcohol craving in young adults: A cross-validation. Addiction, 99, 482-497.
22. Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change. New York: Guilford.
23. Miller, W. R., & Tonigan, J. S. (1996). Assessing drinkers' motivation for change: The Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES). Psychiatry and Addictive Behavior, 10, 81-89.
24. Miller, W. R., Tonigan, J. S., & Longabaugh, R. (1995). The drinker inventory of consequences (DrInC): An instrument for assessing adverse consequences of alcohol abuse. NIAAA Project MATCH Monograph Series, vol. 4. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
25. Monti, P. M., Binkoff, J. A., Abrams, D. B., Zwick, W. R., Nirenberg, T. D., & Liepman, M. R. (1987). Reactivity of alcoholics and nonalcoholics to drinking cues. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96, 122-126.
26. O'Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 32, 396-402.
27. Robins, L., Cotter, L., Bucholz, K., & Compton, W. (1995). Diagnostic Interview Schedule for DSM-IV. St. Louis, MO: Washington University School of Medicine.
28. Rohsenow, D. J., Monti, P. M., Rubonis, A. V., Sirota, A. D., Niaura, R. S., Colby, S., et al. (1994). Cue reactivity as a predictor of drinking among male alcoholics. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 620-626.
29. Sayette, M. A., Shiffman, S., Tiffany, S. T., Niaura, R. S., Martin, C. S., & Shadel, W. G. (2000). The measurement of drug craving. Addiction, 95(Supplement 2), 189-210.
30. Sinha, R., Fuse, T., Aubin, L.-R., & O'Malley, S. S. (2000). Psychological stress, drug-related cues and cocaine craving. Psychopharmacology, 152, 140-148.
31. Skinner, H. A., & Allen, B. A. (1982). Alcohol dependence syndrome: Measurement and validation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 91, 199-209.
32. Smith-Hoerter, K., Stasiewicz, P. R., & Bradizza, C. M. (2004). Subjective reactions to alcohol cue exposure: A qualitative analysis of patients' self-reports. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18, 402-406.
33. Sobell, L. C., & Sobell, M. B. (1992). Timeline followback: A technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In J. Allen & R. Z. Litten (Eds.), Measuring alcohol consumption: Psychosocial and biological methods (pp. 41-72), Totowa, NJ: Humana.
34. Stasiewicz, P. R., Gulliver, S. B., Bradizza, C. M., Torrisi, R., Rohsenow, D. J., & Monti, P. M. (1997). Exposure to negative emotional cues and alcohol cue reactivity with alcoholics: A preliminary investigation. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 35, 1143-1149.
35. Stasiewicz, P. R., & Maisto, S. A. (1993). Two-factor avoidance theory: The role of negative affect in the maintenance of substance use and substance use disorder. Behavior Therapy, 24, 337-356.
36. Stritzke, W. G., Breiner, M. J., Curtin, J. J., & Lang, A. R. (2004). Assessment of substance cue reactivity: Advances in reliability, specificity, and validity. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18, 148-159.
37. Tiffany, S. T., & Conklin, C. A. (2000). A cognitive processing model of alcohol craving and compulsive alcohol use. Addiction, 95(Supplement 2), 145-153.
38. van Prooijen, J. W., & van der Kloot, W. A. (2001). Confirmatory analysis of exploratively obtained factor structures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 777-792.
39. Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 432-442.