Faculty Q & A

Journal of Nursing Education

Volumn 46, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 437-438

  Morin, Karen H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36349027121     PISSN: 01484834     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01484834-20071001-02     Document Type: Note

References (4)

1. Licata, C.M. (2004). Post-tenure faculty review practices: Context and framework. In C.M. Licata & B.E. Brown (Eds.), Post-tenure faculty review and renewal II: Reporting results and shaping policy (pp. 6-11). Bolton, MA: Anker. Quoted in message posted to Tomorrow's Professor electronic mailing list, archived at http://ctl.stanford.edu/Tomprof/postings/602.html
2. O'Meara, K.A. (2004). Beliefs about post-tenure review. The influence of autonomy, collegiality, career stage, and institutional context. The Journal of Higher Education, 75, 178-202.
3. Plater, W.M. (2001). A profession at risk. Using post-tenure review to save tenure and create an intentional future for academic community. Change, 33(4), 53-57.
4. Wood, M., & Johnsrud, L. (2005). Post-tenure review: What matters to faculty. The Review of Higher Education, 28, 393-420.