Beliefs about Post-Tenure Review: The Influence of Autonomy, Collegiality, Career Stage, and Institutional Context

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2004, Pages

  O'Meara, KerryAnn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842487517     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2004.11778902     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. ACE. (1999) On change III: Taking charge of change: A Primer for colleges and universities. An occasional paper on the ACE Project on Leadership and Institutional Transformation.
2. Alstete, J. W. (2000) Post-tenure faculty development: Building a system of faculty improvement and appreciation. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report Vol. 27, No. 4, Adrianna J. Kezar, Series Editor.
3. American Association of University Professors. (1995). On periodic evaluation of tenured faculty. In AAUP Policy Documents and Reports. Washington, DC: AAUP
4. American College Teacher. (1998). National norms for the 1998-1999 HERI faculty survey, published by the University of California at Los Angeles Higher Education Research Institute.
5. Arnold, G. B. (2000) The politics of faculty unionization: The Experience of three New England universities. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
6. Baldwin, R. G. (1990). Faculty career stages and implications for faculty development. In J. H. Schuster & D. W. Wheeler (Eds.), Enhancing faculty careers: Strategies for development and renewal. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Bender, B. W. (1988) Symposium on post-tenure evaluation. Response: Evaluation at the University of Hawaii. Thought and Action, 4, 61-64.
8. Birnbaum, R. (1988) How colleges work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Blackburn, R. T., & Lawrence, J. H. (1995). Faculty at work: Motivation, expectation, satisfaction. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
10. Bland, C. J., & Bergquist, W. H. (1997) The vitality of senior faculty members: Snow on the roof-fire in the furnace. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report Vol. 25, No. 7. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.
11. Bolman L. G., & Deal, T. E. (1991) Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Bowen, H. R., & Schuster, J. H. (1986) American professors: A national resource imperiled. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Clark, B. R. (1987) The academic life. Princeton, NJ. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
14. Diamond, R. M. (1988). Faculty development, instructional development, and organizational development: Options and choices. In E. C. Wadsworth (Ed.), A handbook for new practitioners (pp. 9-11). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
15. Dill, D. D. (1982) The Management of academic culture: Notes on the management of meaning and social integration. Higher Education, 11, 303-320.
16. Felicetti, D. A. (1989). Post-tenure review as a termination mechanism. Journal for Higher Education Management, 4, 51-65.
17. Goodman, M. J. (1994) The Review of tenured faculty at a research university: Outcomes and appraisals. Review of Higher Education, 18(1), 83-94.
18. Harris, B. J. (1996) The relationship between and among policy variables, type of institution, and perceptions of academic administrators with regard to post-tenure review. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University.
19. Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
20. Knefelkamp, L. L. (1990) Seasons of academic life: Honoring our collective autobiography. Liberal Education, 76, 4-11.
21. Kuh, G. D., & Whitt, E. J. (1988) The invisible tapestry: Culture in American colleges and universities. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No 1. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
22. Lees, N. D., Hook, S., & Powers, G. (1999) Post-tenure review: Changes for faculty and challenges for department chairs. The Department Chair, 10(2), 7-8.
23. Licata, C. M. (1986). Post-tenure faculty evaluation: Threat or opportunity? ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No 1, Washington DC: Associaton for the Study of Higher Education.
24. Licata, C. M., & Morreale, J. C. (1997) Post-tenure review: Policies, practices, precautions. American Association for Higher Education Forum on Faculty Roles and Rewards, New Pathways Project, Inquiry #12.
25. Mbuh, R. N. (1993) Faculty perceptions of faculty development programs at the University of South Carolina: Implications for colleges and universities. University of South Carolina.
26. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994) Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Plater, W. M. (2001) Using post-tenure review to save tenure and create an intentional future for the academic community. Change, 33(4), 52-57.
28. Rosovsky, H. (1990) The University: An owner's manual. New York: W. W. Norton.
29. Schein, E. H. (1992) Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed.) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. Seldin, P. (1980). Successful faculty evaluation programs: A practical guide to improve faculty performance and promotion and tenure decisions. Crugers, NY: Coventry Press.
31. Senge, P. S. (1990) The fifth discipline. New York: Currency Doubleday.
32. Tierney, W. G., & Bensimon, E. M. (1996) Promotion and tenure: Community and socialization in academe. Albany: State University of New York Press.
33. Tierney, W. G., & Rhoads, R. A. (1993). Enhancing promotion, tenure, and beyond: Faculty socialization as a cultural process. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 93-6, Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
34. Van Maanen, J. (1984) Doing old things in new ways: The Chains of socialization. In J. Bess (Ed.), College and university organization: Insights from the behavioral sciences. New York: New York University Press.
35. Walker, C. J. (2002). Faculty well-being review: An Alternative to post-tenure review? In C. M. Licata & J. C. Morreale (Eds.), Post-tenure faculty review and renewal: Experienced voices. A publication of AAHE's New Pathways Project: Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
36. Weick, K. E. (1995) Sense making in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Wesson, M., & Johnson, S. (1989). A study of post-tenure peer review at the University of Colorado. Report to the board of regents of the University of Colorado. Boulder, CO.
38. Wood, M., & Johnsrud, L. (2001). Post-tenure review: What matters to faculty. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for the Study of Higher Education: Richmond, VA.
39. Yin, R. K. (1994) Case study research: Design and methods. Applied Social Research Methods Series 5. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.