Examining ways readers engage with websites during think-aloud sessions

Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 254-263

  Damico, James ^a   Baildon, Mark ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36348955513     PISSN: 10813004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/JAAL.51.3.5     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Baildon, M. (2004). The aesthetic dimensions of teaching: Working in the conceptual space between students' experiences and subject matter. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
2. Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2000). Literacy practices. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanič (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 7-15). London: Routledge.
3. Coiro, J. (2003). Reading comprehension on the Internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. The Reading Teacher, 56, 458-464.
4. Damico, J.S., Baildon, M., & Campano, G. (2005). Integrating literacy, technology and disciplined inquiry in social studies: The development and application of a conceptual model. Technology, Humanities, Education and Narrative. Retrieved April 12, 2006, from then journal.org/feature/92/
5. Duke, N.K., & Pearson, P.D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A.E. Farstrup & S.J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 205-242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
6. Durrant, C., & Green, B. (2001). Literacy and the new technologies in school education: Meeting the l(IT)eracy challenge. In H. Fehring & P. Green (Eds.), Critical literacy: A collection of articles from the Australian Literacy Educators'Association (pp. 142-164). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
7. Green, B. (1988). Subject-specific literacy and school learning: A focus on writing. Australian Journal of Education, 32, 156-179.
8. Levstik, L., & Barton, K. (2001 ). Doing history: Investigating with children in elementary and middle schools. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (1997). The social practices of reading. In S. Muspratt, A. Luke, & P. Freebody (Eds.), Constructing critical literacies: Teaching and learning textual practice (pp. 185-226). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
10. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92.
11. Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr, (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 545-561). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Street, B. (2003). What's "new" in New Literacy Studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5, 77-91.
13. Vacca, R.T, & Vacca, J.L. (2004). Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
14. VanSledright, B. (2002). In search of America's past: Learning to read history in elementary school. New York: Teachers College Press.
15. Wineburg, S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73-87.
16. Wineburg, S. (1999). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 488-499.