Multidecadal high-resolution hydrologic modeling of the Arkansas-Red River basin

Journal of Hydrometeorology

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1111-1127

  Sharif, Hatim O ^a,e   Crow, W ^b   Miller, N L ^c   Wood, E F ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^c LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^d PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e The University of Texas at San Antonio   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; HETEROGENEITY; HYDROLOGICAL CYCLE; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROMETEOROLOGY; LAND SURFACE; RUNOFF; SOLAR RADIATION; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

ARKANSAS; NORTH AMERICA; RED BASIN [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 36348952050     PISSN: 1525755X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/JHM622.1     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Berger, K. P., and D. Entekhabi, 2001: Basin hydrologic response relations to distributed physiographic descriptors and climate. J. Hydrol., 247, 169-182.
2. Beven, K. J., and M. J. Kirkby, 1979: A physically-based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol. Sci. Bull., 24, 43-69.
3. Boyles, R. P., and S. Raman, 2003: Analysis of climate trends in North Carolina (1949-1998). Environ. Int., 29, 263-275.
4. Brutsaert, W., 1982: Evaporation into the Atmosphere: Theory, History, and Applications. D. Reidel, 299 pp.
5. Brutsaert, W. and M. Parlange, 1998: Hydrologic cycle explains the evaporation paradox. Nature, 396, 30.
6. Budyko, M. I., 1948: Evaporation under Natural Conditions. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, 136 pp.
7. Budyko, M. I., 1950: Climatic factors of the external physical-geographical processes (in Russian). Gl. Geofiz. Observ., 19, 25-40.
8. Chattopadhyay, N., and M. Hulme, 1997: Evaporation and potential evapotranspiration in India under conditions of recent and future climate change. Agric. For. Meteor., 87, 55-73.
9. Choudhury, B. J., and C. A. Federer, 1984: Some sensitivity results for corn canopy temperature and its spatial variation induced by soil hydraulic heterogeneity. Agric. For. Meteor., 31, 297-317.
10. Choudhury, B. J. and S. B. Idso, 1985: Evaluating plant and canopy resistances of field grown wheat from concurrent diurnal observations of leaf water potential, stomatal resistance, canopy temperature and evapotranspiration flux. Agric. For. Meteor., 34, 67-76.
11. Cosby, B. J., G. M. Hornberger, R. B. Clapp, and T. R. Ginn, 1984: A statistical exploration of the relationships of soil moisture characteristics to the physical properties of soils. Water Resour. Res., 20, 682-690.
12. Crow, W. T., 2001: The impact of land surface heterogeneity on the accuracy and value of space borne soil moisture retrievals. Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University, 309 pp.
13. Crow, W. T., and E. F. Wood, 1999: Multi-scale dynamics of soil moisture variability observed during SGP97. Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 3485-3488.
14. Crow, W. T., and E. F. Wood, 2002: The value of coarse-scale soil moisture observations for regional surface energy balance modeling. J. Hydrometeor., 3, 467-482.
15. Crow, W. T., M. Drusch, and E. F. Wood, 2001: An observation system simulation experiment for the impact of land surface heterogeneity on AMSR-E soil moisture retrieval. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 39, 1622-1632.
16. Dingman, S. L., 1994: Physical Hydrology. Macmillan, 575 pp.
17. D'Odorico, P., L. Ridolfi, A. Porporato, and I. Rodriguez-Iturbe, 2000: Preferential states of seasonal soil moisture: The impact of climate fluctuations. Water Resour. Res., 36, 2209-2219.
18. Famiglietti, J. S., 1992: Aggregation and scaling of spatially-variable hydrological processes: Local, catchment-scale and macroscale models of water and energy balance. Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University, 207 pp.
19. Famiglietti, J. S. and E. F. Wood, 1994: Application of multiscale water and energy balance models on a tall grass prairie. Water Resour. Res., 30, 3079-3093.
20. Farnsworth, R. K., E. S. Thompson, and E. L. Peck, 1982: Evaporation atlas for the contiguous 48 United States. NOAA Tech. Rep. NWS 33, 26 pp.
21. Federer, C. A., 1979: A soil-plant-atmosphere model for transpiration and availability of soil water. Water Resour. Res., 15, 555-562.
22. Groisman, P. Ya., and D. R. Easterling, 1994: Variability and trends of total precipitation and snowfall over the United States and Canada. J. Climate, 7, 184-205.
23. Groisman, P. Ya., and D. R. Legates, 1994: The accuracy of United States precipitation data. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 75, 215-227.
24. Groisman, P. Ya., R. W. Knight, T. R. Karl, D. R. Easterling, B. Sun, and J. Lawrimore, 2004: Contemporary changes of the hydrological cycle over the contiguous United States: Trends derived from in situ observations. J. Hydrometeor., 5, 64-85.
25. Hamlet, A. F., and D. P. Lettenmaier, 2005: Production of temporally consistent gridded precipitation and temperature fields for the continental United States. J. Hydrometeor., 6, 330-336.
26. Henderson-Sellers, A., A. J. Pitman, P. K. Love, P. Irannejad, and T. Chen, 1995: The Project for Intercomparison of Land Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS) Phases 2 and 3. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 76, 489-503.
27. Hornberger, G. M., and Coauthors, 2001: A plan for a new science initiative on the global water cycle. U.S. Global Change Research Program Rep., Washington, DC, 118 pp.
28. Jacquemin, B., and J. Noilhan, 1990: Sensitivity study and validation of a land-surface parameterization using the HAPEX-MOBILITY data set. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 52, 93-134.
29. Korzun, V. I., A. A. Sokolov, M. I. Budyko, K. P. Voskresensky, G. P. Kalinin, A. A. Konoplyantsev, E. S. Korotkevich, and M. I. L'vovitch, Eds., 1978: World Water Balance and Water Resources of the Earth (in Russian). UNESCO, 663 pp.
30. Koster, R. D., and P. C. D. Milly, 1997: The interplay between transpiration and runoff formulations in land surface schemes used with atmospheric models. J. Climate, 10, 1578-1591.
31. Kumar, S. V., and Coauthors, 2006: Land information system: An interoperable framework for high resolution land surface modeling. Environ. Modell. Software, 21, 1402-1415.
32. Lawrimore, J. H., and T. C. Peterson, 2000: Pan evaporation trends in dry and humid regions of the United States. J. Hydrometeor., 1, 543-546.
33. Legates, D. R., and G. J. McCabe, 1999: Evaluating the use of "goodness-of-fit" measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour. Res., 35, 233-241.
34. Lohmann, D., and Coauthors, 1998: The Project for Intercomparison of Land-Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS) phase 2(c) Red-Arkansas River basin experiment: 3. Spatial and temporal analysis of water fluxes. Global Planet. Change, 19, 161-179.
35. Maurer, E. P., A. W. Wood, J. C. Adam, D. P. Lettemnaier, and B. Nijssen, 2002: A long-term hydrologically based dataset of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States. J. Climate, 15, 3237-3251.
36. Maurer, E. P., D. P. Lettenmaier, and N. J. Mantua, 2004: Variability and potential sources of predictability of North American runoff. Water Resour. Res., 40, W09306, doi:10.1029/2003WR002789.
37. Miller, N. L., and Coauthors, 2005: The DOE Water Cycle Pilot Study. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 86, 359-374.
38. Nash, J. E., and J. V. Sutcliffe, 1970: River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I. A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol., 10, 282-290.
39. Ol'dekop, E. M., 1911: On evaporation from the surface of river basins (in Russian). Transactions on Meteorological Observations, University of Tartu, 4.
40. Pauwels, V. R. N., and E. F. Wood, 1999: A soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer scheme for the modeling of water and energy balance processes in high latitudes. 1. Model improvements. J. Geophys. Res., 104 (1322), 27 811-27 822.
41. Peters-Lidard, C. D., M. S. Zion, and E. F. Wood, 1997: A soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer scheme for modeling spatially variable water and energy balance processes. J. Geophys. Res., 102, 4303-4324.
42. Peters-Lidard, C. D., F. Pan, and E. F. Wood, 2001: A re-examination of modeled and measured soil moisture spatial variability and its implications for land surface modeling. Adv. Water Res., 24, 1069-1083.
43. Peters-Lidard, C. D., S. Kumar, Y. Tian, J. L. Eastman, and P. Houser, 2004: Global urban-scale land-atmosphere modeling with the Land Information System. Preprints, Symp. on Planning, Nowcasting, and Forecasting in the Urban Zone, Seattle, WA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, 4.1.
44. Pielke, R. A., 1984: Mesoscale Meteorological Modeling. Academic Press, 612 pp.
45. Quintana-Gomez, R., 1997: Changes in evaporation patterns detected in northernmost South America. Homogeneity testing. Proc. Seventh Int. Meeting on Statistical Climatology, Whistler, BC, Canada, NRCSE, 25-29.
46. Rawls, W. J., D. L. Brakensiek, and K. E. Saxton, 1982: Estimation of soil water properties. Trans. ASAE, 25, 1316-1320.
47. Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., G. K. Vogel, R. Rigon, D. Entekhabi, F. Castelli, and A. Rinaldo, 1995: On the spatial organization of soil moisture fields. Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 2757-2760.
48. Sankarasubramanian, A., and R. M. Vogel, 2002: Comment on the paper: "Basin hydrologic response relations to distributed physiographic descriptors and climate" by Karen Plaut Berger, Dara Entekhabi, 2001. Journal of Hydrology 247, 169-182. J. Hydrol., 263, 257-261.
49. Schreiber, P., 1904: Ueber die Beziehungen zwischen dern Niederschlag und der Wasseruhrung der Flusse in Mitteleuropa. [On the relationship between precipitation and the runoff of rivers in Central Europe.] Meteor. Z., 21, 441-452.
50. Sharif, H. O., F. L. Ogden, W. F. Krajewski, and M. Xue, 2002: Numerical simulations of radar rainfall error propagation. Water Resour. Res., 38, 1140, doi:10.1029/2001WR000525.
51. Stull, R. B., 1995: Meteorology Today for Scientists and Engineers. West, 385 pp.
52. Szilagyi, J., G. G. Katul, and M. B. Parlange, 2001: Evapotranspiration intensifies over the conterminous United States. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 127, 354-362.
53. Thornton, P. E., and S. W. Running, 1999: An improved algorithm for estimating incident daily solar radiation from measurements of temperature, humidity, and precipitation. Agric. For. Meteor., 93, 211-228.
54. Thornton, P. E., H. Hasenauer, and M. A. White, 2000: Simultaneous estimation of daily solar radiation and humidity from observed temperature and precipitation: An application over complex terrain in Austria. Agric. For. Meteor., 104, 255-271.
55. Tian, Y., and Coauthors, 2004: Comparison of seasonal and spatial variations of leaf area index and fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Common Land Model. J. Geophys. Res., 109, D01103, doi:10.1029/2003JD003777.
56. Twine, T. E., and Coauthors, 2000: Correcting eddy-covariance flux underestimates over a grassland. Agric. For. Meteor., 103, 279-300.
57. USGS, cited 2007: USGS surface-water data for the nation. [Available online at http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/sw.]
58. Walter, M. T., D. S. Wilks, J. Y. Parlange, and R. L. Schneider, 2004: Increasing evapotranspiration from the conterminous United States. J. Hydrometeor., 5, 405-408.
59. Weaver, C. P., S. Baidya Roy, and R. Avissar, 2002: Sensitivity of simulated mesoscale atmospheric circulations resulting from landscape heterogeneity to aspects of model configuration. J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8041, doi:10.1029/2001JD000376.
60. 2O Project (IHOP_2002) and some preliminary highlights. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 85, 253-277.
61. Wood, E. F., and Coauthors, 1998: The Project for Intercomparison of Land-Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS) phase 2(c) Red-Arkansas River experiment: 1. Experiment description and summary intercomparisons. Global Planet. Change, 19, 115-135.
62. Zhang, L., W. R. Dawes, and G. R. Walker, 2001: Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resour. Res., 37, 701-708.