Classification images reveal spatiotemporal contour interpolation

Vision Research

Volumn 47, Issue 28, 2007, Pages 3460-3475

  Keane, Brian P ^a   Lu, Hongjing ^b   Kellman, Philip J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Classification image; Contour integration; Contour interpolation; Filling in; Illusory contours; Object persistence; Shape discrimination; Spatiotemporal object perception; Time course

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MOTION; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME PERCEPTION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; CUES; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PERCEPTUAL CLOSURE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOMETRICS; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 36348939894     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Abbey, C. K., & Eckstein, M. P. (2002). Classification image analysis: Estimation and statistical inference for two-alternative forced-choice experiments. Journal of Vision, 2(1):5, 66-78. Available from: http://journalofvision.org/2/1/5/, doi:10.1167/2.1.5.
2. Ahumada A.J. Perceptual classification images from Vernier acuity masked by noise [Abstract]. Perception 26 Suppl. 18 (1996) 18
3. Ahumada A.J., and Lovell J. Stimulus features in signal detection. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49 (1971) 1751-1756
4. Anderson B.L. The demise of the identity hypothesis and the insufficiency and nonnecessity of contour relatability in predicting object interpolation: Comment on Kellman, Garrigan, and Shipley (2005). Psychological Review 114 2 (2007) 470-487
5. Bachmann, T. (1994). Psychophysiology of visual masking. Commack, NY: Nova Science.
6. Barenholtz E., and Feldman J. Determination of visual figure and ground in dynamically deforming shapes. Cognition 101 3 (2006) 530-544
7. Barlow H.B. Temporal and spatial summation in human vision at different background intensities. Journal of Physiology, London 141 (1958) 337-350
8. Barlow H., and Tripathy S.P. Correspondence noise and signal pooling in the detection of coherent visual motion. Journal of Neuroscience 17 20 (1997) 7954-7966
9. Brainard D.H. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision 10 (1997) 433-436
10. Bruno N., and Bertamini M. Identifying contours from occlusion events. Perception & Psychophysics 48 (1990) 331-342
11. Bruno N., and Gerbino W. Illusory figures based on kinematics. Perception 20 2 (1991) 259-273
12. Burr, D. C. (1979). On seeing objects in motion. Doctoral dissertation. University of Cambridge.
13. Burr D.C. Temporal summation of moving images by the human visual system. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 211 (1981) 321-339
14. Burr D.C., and Ross J. Visual processing of motion. Trends in Neuroscience 9 (1986) 304-306
15. Burr D.C., Ross J., and Morrone M.C. Seeing objects in motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 227 (1986) 249-265
16. Changizi M.A., and Widders D.M. Latency correction explains the classical geometrical illusions. Perception 31 10 (2002) 1241-1262
17. Eagleman D.M., and Sejnowski T.J. Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science 287 5460 (2000) 2036-2038
18. Emerson R.C., Bergen J.R., and Adelson E.H. Directionally selective complex cells and the computation of motion energy in cat visual cortex. Vision Research 32 (1992) 203-218
19. Fantoni, C., & Gerbino, W. (2003). Contour interpolation by vector-field combination. Journal of Vision, 3(4):4, 281-303. Available from: http://journalofvision.org/3/4/4/, doi:10.1167/3.4.4.
20. Gibson J.J. The problem of temporal order in stimulation and perception. Journal of Psychology 62 (1966) 141-149
21. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception (1979), Houghton, Boston
22. Gold J.M., Murray R.M., Bennett P.J., and Sekuler A.B. Deriving behavioural receptive fields for visually completed contours. Current Biology 10 (2000) 663-666
23. Gold, J. M., & Shubel, E. (2006). The spatiotemporal properties of visual completion measured by response classification. Journal of Vision, 6(4):5, 356-365. Available from: http://journalofvision.org/6/4/5/, doi:10.1167/6.4.5.
24. Gosselin F., and Schyns P.G. Superstitious perceptions reveal properties of internal representations. Psychological Science 14 (2003) 505-509
25. Green D.M., and Swets J.A. Signal detection theory and psychophysics (1966), Wiley, New York
26. Grosof D., Shapley R., and Hawken M. Macaque V1 neurons can signal "illusory" contours. Nature 365 (1993) 550-552
27. Guttman S.E., and Kellman P.J. Contour interpolation revealed by a dot localization paradigm. Vision Research 44 (2004) 1799-1815
28. Halgren E., Mendola J., Chong C.D., and Dale A.M. Cortical activation to illusory shapes as measured with magnetoencephalography. Neuroimage 18 4 (2003) 1001-1009
29. Helmholtz, H. v. (1867/1962). Treatise on physiological optics (Vol. 3). New York: Dover Publications.
30. Hubel D.H., and Wiesel T. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. Journal of Physiology 195 (1968) 215-243
31. Kandil, F. I., & Lappe, M. (2007) Spatio-temporal interpolation is accomplished by binocular form and motion mechanisms. PLoS ONE, 2(2): e264. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000264.
32. Keane, B. P., Kellman, P. J., & Elwell, C. M. (2007). Classification images reveal differences between spatial and spatiotemporal contour interpolation [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 7(9), 603, 603a. Available from: http://journalofvision.org/7/9/603/, doi:10.1167/7.9.603.
33. Kellman P.J., and Cohen M.H. Kinetic subjective contours. Perception & Psychophysics 35 (1984) 237-244
34. Kellman P.J., Garrigan P., and Shipley T.F. Object interpolation in three dimensions. Psychological Review 112 3 (2005) 586-609
35. Kellman P.J., Garrigan P., Shipley T.F., and Keane B.P. Interpolation processes in object perception: Reply to Anderson (2007). Psychological Review 114 2 (2007) 488-508
36. Kellman P.J., Guttman S.E., and Wickens T.D. Geometric and neural models of object perception. In: Shipley T.F., and Kellman P.J. (Eds). From fragments to objects: Segmentation and grouping in vision (2001), Elsevier, Amsterdam 183-245
37. Kellman P.J., and Shipley T.F. A theory of visual interpolation in object perception. Cognitive Psychology 23 (1991) 141-221
38. Kellman P.J., Yin C., and Shipley T.F. A common mechanism for illusory and occluded object completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 859-869
39. Lee S., and Nguyen M. Dynamics of subjective contour formation in the early visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98 (2001) 1907-1911
40. Lennie P. Single units and visual cortical organization. Perception 27 (1998) 889-935
41. Liu T., Fuller S., and Carrasco M. Attention alters the appearance of motion coherence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13 (2006) 1091-1096
42. Lorenceau J., and Alais D. Form constraints on motion binding. Nature Neuroscience 4 7 (2001) 745-751
43. Lu, H., & Liu, Z. (2006). Computing dynamic classification images from correlation maps. Journal of Vision, 6(4):12, 475-483. Available from: http://journalofvision.org/6/4/12/, doi:10.1167/6.4.12.
44. Montaser-Kouhsari, L., & Rajimehr, R. (2004). Attentional modulation of adaptation to illusory lines. Journal of Vision, 4(6), 3, 434-444. Available from: http://journalofvision.org/4/6/3/, doi:10.1167/4.6.3.
45. Moore C.M., Yantis S., and Vaughan B. Object-based visual selection: Evidence from perceptual completion. Psychological Science 9 (1998) 104-110
46. Morgan M.J., Findlay J.M., and Watt R.J. Aperture viewing: A review and a synthesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 34 (1982) 211-233
47. Morrone M.C., Burr D.C., and Vaina L.M. Two stages of visual processing for radial and circular motion. Nature 376 (1995) 507-509
48. Murray M.M., Foxe D.M., Javitt D.C., and Foxe J.J. Setting boundaries: Brain dynamics of modal and amodal illusory shape completion in humans. Journal of Neuroscience 24 (2004) 6898-6903
49. Murray, R. F., Bennett, P. J., & Sekuler, A. B. (2002). Optimal methods for calculating classification images: Weighted sums. Journal of Vision, 2(1):6, 79-104. Available from: http://journalofvision.org/2/1/6/, doi:10.1167/2.1.6.
50. Murray, R. F., Bennett, P. J., & Sekuler, A. B. (2005). Classification images predict absolute efficiency. Journal of Vision, 5(2):5, 139-149. Available from: http://journalofvision.org/5/2/5/, doi:10.1167/5.2.5.
51. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
52. Neri P., and Levi D.M. Receptive versus perceptive fields from the reverse-correlation viewpoint. Vision Research 46 (2006) 2465-2474
53. Nijhawan R. Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 370 (1994) 256-257
54. Nishida S. Motion based analysis of spatial patterns by the human visual system. Current Biology 14 (2004) 830-838
55. Palmer, E. M. (2003). Spatiotemporal relatability in the perception of dynamically occluded objects. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
56. Palmer E.M., Kellman P.J., and Shipley T.F. A theory of dynamic occluded and illusory object perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135 4 (2006) 513-541
57. Parks T.E. Post-retinal visual storage. American Journal of Psychology 78 (1965) 145-147
58. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 10 (1997) 437-442
59. Pestilli F., and Carrasco M. Attention enhances contrast sensitivity at cued and impairs it at uncued locations. Vision Research 45 (2005) 1867-1875
60. Reynolds R.I. Perception of an illusory contour as a function of processing time. Perception 10 (1981) 107-115
61. Ringach D.L., and Shapley R. Spatial and temporal properties of illusory contours and amodal boundary completion. Vision Research 36 (1996) 3037-3050
62. Ringach D.L., Sapiro G., and Shapley R. A subspace reverse-correlation technique for the study of visual neurons. Vision Research 37 (1997) 2455-2464
63. Ross J., and Hogben J.H. The Pulfrich effect and short-term memory in stereopsis. Vision Research 15 (1975) 1289-1290
64. Rubin N. The role of junctions in surface completion and contour matching. Perception 30 (2001) 339-366
65. Sekuler A.B., and Murray R.F. Visual completion: A case study in grouping. In: Shipley T.F., and Kellman P.J. (Eds). From fragments to objects: Segmentation and grouping in vision (2001), Elsevier, New York 265-294
66. Seghier M., and Vuilleumier P. Functional neuroimaging findings on the human perception of illusory contours. Neuroscience Biobehavioral Reviews 30 (2006) 595-612
67. Shipley T.F., and Kellman P.J. The role of discontinuities in the perception of subjective figures. Perception and Psychophysics 48 3 (1990) 259-270
68. Shipley T.F., and Kellman P.J. Perception of partly occluded objects and illusory figures: Evidence for an identity hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 1 (1992) 106-120
69. Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs, 74(11, Whole No. 498).
70. Tse P.U. Voluntary attention modulates the brightness of overlapping transparent surfaces. Vision Research 45 9 (2005) 1095-1098
71. Tse P.U., and Albert M.K. Amodal completion in the absence of image tangent discontinuities. Perception 27 4 (1998) 455-464
72. Turvey M., and Kravetz S. Retrieval from iconic memory with shape as the selection criterion. Perception & Psychophysics 8 (1970) 171-172
73. Von der Heydt R., Peterhans E., and Baumgartner G. Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses (1984), Science
74. Von Wright J. Selection in visual immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 20 (1968) 62-68
75. Watamaniuk S.N.J., and McKee S.P. 'Seeing' motion behind occluders. Nature 377 (1995) 729-730
76. Xing, J., & Ahumada, A. J. (2002). Estimation of human-observer templates in temporal-varying noise [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 2(7):343, 343a. Avaiable from: http://journalofvision.org/2/7/343/, doi:10.1167/2.7.343.
77. Yantis S., and Nakama T. Visual interactions in the path of apparent motion. Nature Neuroscience 1 (1998) 508-512