Corruption, illegal trade and compliance with the Montreal Protocol

Environmental and Resource Economics

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 475-496

  Ivanova, Kate ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Corruption; Environment; Illegal; Law; Montreal Protocol; Tariff; Trade

Indexed keywords

CHLOROFLUOROCARBONS; DATA REDUCTION; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE;

EFFECTS OF CORRUPTION; LEGAL IMPORTS; MONTREAL PROTOCOL; SMUGGLING;

CLIMATOLOGY;

CFC; CORRUPTION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; MONTREAL PROTOCOL; TRADE;

EID: 36249025656     PISSN: 09246460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-007-9088-5     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Baltagi BH (1995) Econometric analysis of panel data. Wiley, New York
2. Benedick RE (1998) Ozone diplomacy: new directions in safeguarding the planet. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
3. Brack D (1996) International trade and the Montreal Protocol. Royal Institute of International Affairs, London
4. Cole MA, Rayner AJ, Bates JM (1997) The environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical analysis. Environ Dev Econ 2:401-416
5. Copeland BR (2001) International trade in waste products in the presence of illegal disposal. In: Batabyal AA, Beladi H (eds) The economics of international trade and the environment. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton
6. Damania R (2002) Environmental controls with corrupt bureaucrats. Environ Dev Econ 7:407-427
7. Damania R, Fredriksson PG, List JA (2003) Trade liberalization, corruption, and environmental policy formation: theory and evidence. J Environ Econ Manage 46:490-512
8. Damania R, Fredriksson PG, Mani M (2004) The persistence of corruption and regulatory compliance failures: theory and evidence. Public Choice 121:363-390
9. Fredriksson PG, Svensson J (2003) Political instability, corruption and policy formation: the case of environmental policy. J Public Econ 87:1383-1405
10. Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353-377
11. Hsiao C (2003) Analysis of panel data, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, New York
12. 2 concentrations: reconsidering the environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecol Econ 25:209-220
13. Knack S, Keefer P (1995) Institutions and economic performance: cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Econ Polit 7(3):207-227
14. Little RJA (1995) Modeling the drop-out mechanism in repeated-measures studies. J Am Stat Assoc 90(431):1112-1121
15. Lopez R, Mitra S (2000) Corruption, pollution, and the Kuznets environment curve. J Environ Econ Manage 40:13-150
16. Martin L, Panagariya A (1984) Smuggling, trade, and price disparity: a crime theoretic approach. J Int Econ 17:201-217
17. Mookherjee D, Png IPL (1995) Corruptible law enforcers: how should they be compensated? Econ J 105(428):145-159
18. Murdoch JC, Sandler T (1997) The voluntary provision of a pure public good: the case of reduced CFC emissions and the Montreal Protocol. J Public Econ 63:331-349
19. Patterson HD, Thomson R (1971) Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58(3):545-554
20. Pitt MM (1981) Smuggling and price disparity. J Int Econ 11:44-458
21. Rubin DB (1976) Inference and missing data. Biometrika 63(3):581-592
22. Sandler T, Arce MDG (2003) Pure public goods versus commons: benefit-cost duality. Land Econ 79(3):355-368
23. Shafik N (1994) Economic development and environmental quality: an econometric analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, New Series 46, Special Issue on Environ Econ 757-773
24. Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1993) Corruption. Q J Econ 108(3):599-617
25. Swallow WH, Monahan JF (1984) Monte Carlo comparison of ANOVA, MICQUE, REML, and ML estimators of variance components. Technometrics 26(1):47-57
26. United Nations Environment Program (2001) Illegal trade in ozone depleting substances: is there a hole in the Montreal Protocol? OzonAction Program, Division of Technology, Industry and Economics, OzonAction Newsletter Special Supplement, Number 6