Artificial neural networks vs linear regression in a fluid mechanics and chemical modelling problem: Elimination of hydrogen sulphide in a lab-scale biofilter

2007 IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, AICCSA 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 584-587

  GIbarra Berastegi, ^a   Elias, A ^a   Arias, R ^a   Barona, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUID MECHANICS; HYDROGEN SULFIDE; LINEAR REGRESSION; MULTILAYER NEURAL NETWORKS;

BIOLOGICAL REACTOR; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION (MLR);

BIOFILTERS;

EID: 36248978116     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/AICCSA.2007.370941     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Strik, David P.B.T.B., Domnanovich, A.M., Zani, L., Braun, R., Holubar, P., 2005. Prediction of trace compounds in biogas from anaerobic digestion using theMATLAB Neural Network Toolbox. Environmental Modelling & Software 20 (6) 803-810.
2. Bhat, T.R., Divya Venkataramani, Ravi, V., Murty, C.V.S. 2006. An improved differential evolution method for efficient parameter estimation in biofilter modeling. Biochemical Engineering Journal 28 (2) 16-176.
3. Saho Ikemoto, Jennings, Aaron A., Skubal, K., L. Skubal. 2006. Modeling hydrophobic VOC biofilter treatment in the presence of nutrient stimulation and hydrophilic VOC inhibition. Environmental Modelling & Software. 21(10)1387-1401.
4. Ok-Hyun Park, ln-Gyung Jung, 2006. A model study based on experiments on toluene removal under high load condition in biofilters. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 28 (3) 269-274.
5. Mitsuyo Hirai, Masatoshi Ohtake, Makoto Shoda, 1990. Removal kinetics of hydrogen sulfide, methanethiol and dimethyl sulfide by peat biofilters. Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering 70 (5) 334-339.
6. Devinny, J.S., Ramesh, J. 2005. A phenomenological review of biofilter models. Chemical Engineering Journal 113 (2-3) 187-196.
7. Bishop, C., 1995. Neural Networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press.
8. Masters T., 1993. Practical Neural Network Recipes in C++. Academic Press.
9. Haykin, S., 1994. Neural Networks: A comprehensive foundation. New York. McMillan Publishing.
10. Neuralware. http://www.neuralware.com/support faq.jsp. 2006.
11. Statistica 7.0. User's manual. http://www.statsoft.com. 2006.
12. Ibarra-Berastegi, G. Short-term prediction of air pollution levels using neural networks. Air Pollution XIV. pp. 23-32. ISBN 1-84564-165-5. WIT Press. Southampton. UK. 2006.
13. Maier, H.R., Dandy, G.C., 2000. Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications. Environmental Modelling & Software 15 (1) 101-124.
14. Maier, H.R., Morgan, N., Chow, C.W.K., 2004. Use of artificial neural networks for predicting optimal alum doses and treated water quality parameters. Environmental Modelling & Software 19 (5) 485-494.
15. 2S and product analysis. Process Biochemistry 37 (8) 812-820.
16. Barona A., Elias A., Arias R., Cano I., Gonzalez R., 2004. Biofilter response to gradual and sudden variations in operating conditions. Biochemical Engineering Journal 22(1)25-31.
17. Elias A., Ibarra-Berastegi G., Ormazabal J., Murgia 1., Zugazti P., 1996. ADM: A model for water treatment in an anaerobic biological reactor, in Development and Application of Computer Techniques to Environmental Studies VI. Ill, CMP. WIT Press, Southampton, pp. 153-162.
18. Altaf H. Wani, Branion, R. M. R. , Lau, A.K., 1998. Effects of periods of starvation and fluctuating hydrogen sulfide concentration on biofilter dynamics and performance. Journal of Hazardous Materials 60 (3) 287-303.