Can whisker spot patterns be used to identify individual polar bears?

Journal of Zoology

Volumn 273, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 333-339

  Anderson, C J R ^a   Roth, J D ^a   Waterman, J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Information theory; Natural marking; Noninvasive; Photograph; Reliability; Ursus maritimus

Indexed keywords

BEAR; ESTIMATION METHOD; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; MARKING METHOD; PHOTOGRAPH;

CANADA; HUDSON BAY; NORTH AMERICA;

ANIMALIA; URSUS MARITIMUS;

EID: 36248965759     PISSN: 09528369     EISSN: 14697998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2007.00340.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Arzoumanian, Z., Holmberg, J. Norman, B. (2005). An astronomical pattern-matching algorithm for computer-aided identification of whale sharks Rhincodon typus. J. Appl. Ecol. 42, 999 1011.
2. Borges-Landaez, P.A. Shine, R. (2003). Influence of toe-clipping on running speed in Eulamprus quoyii, an Australian scincid lizard. J. Herpetol. 37, 592 595.
3. Bretagnolle, V., Thibault, J.C. Dominici, J.M. (1994). Field identification of individual ospreys using head marking pattern. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 58, 175 178.
4. Derocher, A.E. Stirling, I. (1990). Observations of aggregating behavior in adult male polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Can. J. Zool. 68, 1390 1394.
5. Dyck, M.G. Baydack, R.K. (2004). Vigilance behaviour of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in the context of wildlife-viewing activities at Churchill, Manitoba, Canada. Biol. Conserv. 116, 343 350.
6. Eckhardt, G.H. (2005). The effects of ecotourism on polar bear behavior. MS thesis, University of Central Florida, Orlando.
7. Eckhardt, G.H., Waterman, J.M. Roth, J.D. (2002). The functional significance of play fighting in polar bears: are they asocial? Integr. Comp. Biol. 42, 1224.
8. Eitam, A. Blaustein, L. (2002). Noninvasive individual identification of larval Salamandra using tailfin spot patterns. Amphib.-Reptil. 23, 215 219.
9. Friday, N., Smith, T.D., Stevick, P.T. Allen, J. (2000). Measurement of photographic quality and individual distinctiveness for the photographic identification of humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae. Mar. Mammal. Sci. 16, 355 374.
10. Gowans, S. Whitehead, H. (2001). Photographic identification of northern bottlenose whales (Hyperoodon ampullatus): sources of heterogeneity from natural marks. Mar. Mammal. Sci. 17, 76 93.
11. Grinnell, J., Packer, C. Pusey, A.E. (1995). Cooperation in male lions - kinship, reciprocity or mutualism. Anim. Behav. 49, 95 105.
12. Hammond, P.S., Mizroch, S.A. Donovan, G.P. (Eds) (1990). Individual recognition of cetaceans: use of photo-identification and other techniques to estimate population parameters. Cambridge, MA : International Whaling Commission.
13. Hayes, J.P. Jenkins, S.H. (1997). Individual variation in mammals. J. Mammal. 78, 274 293.
14. Jarman, P.J., Jones, M.E., Johnson, C.N., Southwell, C.J., Stuartdick, R.I., Higginbottom, K.B. Clarke, J.L. (1989). Macropod studies at Wallaby Creek. VIII. Individual recognition of kangaroos and wallabies. Aust. Wildl. Res. 16, 179 185.
15. Karanth, K.U. Nichols, J.D. (1998). Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79, 2852 2862.
16. Kelly, M.J. (2001). Computer-aided photograph matching in studies using individual identification: an example from Serengeti cheetahs. J. Mammal. 82, 440 449.
17. Langtimm, C.A., Beck, C.A., Edwards, H.H., Fick-Child, K.J., Ackerman, B.B., Barton, S.L. Hartley, W.C. (2004). Survival estimates for Florida manatees from the photo-identification of individuals. Mar. Mammal. Sci. 20, 438 463.
18. Larson, H.J. (1982). Introduction to probability theory and statistical inference. 3rd edn. New York : Wiley.
19. Latour, P.B. (1981a). Interactions between free-ranging, adult male polar bears (Ursus maritimus Phipps) - a case of adult social play. Can. J. Zool. 59, 1775 1783.
20. Latour, P.B. (1981b). Spatial relationships and behavior of polar bears (Ursus maritimus Phipps) concentrated on land during the ice-free season of Hudson Bay. Can. J. Zool. 59, 1763 1774.
21. Lunn, N.J. (1986). Observations of nonaggressive behavior between polar bear family groups. Can. J. Zool. 64, 2035 2037.
22. Markowitz, T.M., Harlin, A.D. Wursig, B. (2003). Digital photography improves efficiency of individual dolphin identification. Mar. Mammal. Sci. 19, 217 223.
23. Martin, P. Kraemer, H.C. (1987). Individual differences in behavior and their statistical consequences. Anim. Behav. 35, 1366 1375.
24. Miththapala, S., Seidensticker, J., Phillips, L.G., Fernando, S.B.U. Smallwood, J.A. (1989). Identification of individual leopards (Panthera pardus kotiya) using spot pattern variation. J. Zool. (Lond.) 218, 527 536.
25. Mougeot, F., Thibaul, J.C. Bretagnolle, V. (2002). Effects of territorial intrusions, courtship feedings and mate fidelity on the copulation behaviour of the osprey. Anim. Behav. 64, 759 769.
26. Nichols, J.D. (1992). Capture-recapture models: using marked animals to study population dynamics. BioScience 42, 94 102.
27. Nietfeld, M.T., Barret, M.W. Silvy, N. (1994). Wildlife marking techniques. In Research and management techniques for wildlife and habitats : 147 159. Bookhout, T.A. (Ed.). Bethesda, MA : The Wildlife Society.
28. Pennycuick, C.J. (1978). Identification using natural markings. In Animal markings : 147 159. Stonehouse, B. (Ed.). London : MacMillan.
29. Pennycuick, C.J. Rudnai, J. (1970). A method of identifying individual lions Panthera leo with an analysis of reliability of identification. J. Zool. (Lond.) 160, 497 508.
30. Quinn, G.P. Keough, M.J. (2002). Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
31. Regehr, E.V., Lunn, N.J., Amstrup, S.C. Stirling, I. (2005). Population decline of polar bears in Western Hudson Bay in relation to climatic warming. In 16th Biennial Conference on the biology of marine mammals. San Diego, CA : Society for Marine Mammalogy. p233.
32. Rodda, G.H., Bock, B.C., Burghardt, G.M. Rand, A.S. (1988). Techniques for identifying individual lizards at a distance reveal influences of handling. Copeia 4, 905 913.