You gotta light?. On the luxury of context for understanding talk in interaction

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 42-54

  McHoul, Alec ^a   Rapley, Mark ^b   Antaki, Charles ^c  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36248956114     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Antaki C. Identity-ascriptions in their time and place: 'Fagin' and 'the terminally dim'. In: Antaki C., and Widdicombe S. (Eds). Identities in Talk (1998), Sage, London 71-86
2. Billig M. Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse and Society 10 (1999) 543-558
3. Billig M. Conversation analysis and the claims of naivety. Discourse and Society 10 (1999) 572-576
4. Capone A. Pragmemes (a study with reference to English and Italian). Journal of Pragmatics 37 (2005) 1355-1377
5. Capone A. On Grice's circle (further considerations on the semantics/pragmatics debate). Journal of Pragmatics 38 (2006) 645-669
6. Fairclough N. Discourse and Social Change (1992), Polity Press, Cambridge
7. Garfinkel H. Studies in Ethnomethodology (1967), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
8. Heritage J.C. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology (1984), Polity, Cambridge
9. McHoul A., and Rapley M. 'Ghost: do not forget; this visitation/is but to whet thy almost blunted purpose': culture, psychology and 'being human'. Culture and Psychology 7 4 (2001) 433-451
10. McHoul A., and Rapley M. Re-presenting culture and the self: (dis)agreeing in theory and practice. Theory and Psychology 15 4 (2005) 431-447
11. Mey J. Pragmatics: an Introduction (1999), Blackwell, Oxford
12. Parker I. Discourse Dynamics: Critical Analysis for Social and Individual Psychology (1992), Routledge, London
13. Parker I., and Burman E. Against discursive imperialism, empiricism, and constructionism: thirty-two problems with discourse analysis. In: Burman E., and Parker I. (Eds). Discourse Analytic Research: Repertoires and Readings of Texts in Action (1993), Routledge, London 155-172
14. Potter J. Cognition as context (whose cognition?). Research on Language and Social Interaction 31 (1998) 29-44
15. Rapley M. The Social Construction of Intellectual Disability (2004), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
16. Sacks, Harvey, 1970. Aspects of the Sequential Organization of Conversation, unpublished book manuscript.
17. Sacks H. An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In: Sudnow D. (Ed). Studies in Social Interaction (1972), Free Press, New York 31-74
18. Sacks H. Lectures on Conversation vol. 1 (1992), Blackwell, Oxford
19. Sacks H. Lectures on Conversation vol. 2 (1992), Blackwell, Oxford
20. Schegloff E.A. Whose text? Whose context?. Discourse and Society 8 (1997) 165-187
21. Schegloff E.A. Reply to Wetherell. Discourse and Society 9 (1998) 413-416
22. Schegloff E.A. Discourse, pragmatics, conversation, analysis. Discourse Studies 1 4 (1999) 405-436
23. Schegloff E.A. 'Schegloff's texts' as 'Billig's data': a critical reply. Discourse and Society 10 (1999) 558-572
24. Schenkein J. Sketch of an analytic mentality for the study of conversational interaction. In: Schenkein J. (Ed). Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction (1978), Academic Press, New York 1-6
25. Van Dijk T.A. On context. Discourse and Society 10 (1999) 291-292
26. Wieder D.L. Language and Social Reality (1974), Mouton, The Hague
27. Wetherell M. Positioning and interpretative repertoires: conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society 9 (1998) 387-412
28. Wetherell M. Beyond binaries. Theory and Psychology 9 3 (1999) 399-406
29. Willig C. Beyond appearances: a critical realist approach to social constructionist work in psychology. In: Nightingale D., and Cromby J. (Eds). Psychology and Social Constructionism: a Critical Analysis of Theory and Practice (1999), OUP, Buckingham 37-51