Re-presenting Culture and the Self: (Dis)agreeing in Theory and in Practice

Theory & Psychology

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 431-447

  Mchoul, Alec ^a   Rapley, Mark ^b  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b EDITH COWAN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

agreement; critique of psychology; culture; ethnomethodology; Garfinkel; Heidegger; Husserl; representationalism; Sacks; self

Indexed keywords

EID: 24144489035     PISSN: 09593543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0959354305054746     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Button, G.,Coulter, J.,Lee, J.R.E., &Sharrock, W.(1995). Computers, minds and conduct.Cambridge: Polity.
2. Coulter, J.(1979). The social construction of mind: Studies in ethnomethodology and linguistic philosophy.London: Macmillan.
3. Descartes, R.(1985). Rules for the direction of the mind. In The philosophical writings of Descartes (Vol. 1, pp. 7-76; J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch, Trans.).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Edwards, D.(1997). Discourse and cognition.London: Sage.
5. Farr, R.(1998). Foreword. In U. Flick(Ed.), The psychology of the social (pp. xi-xiii).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Garfinkel, H.(1967). Studies in ethnomethodology.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7. Garfinkel, H.(2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
8. Hall, S.(Ed.). (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices.London: Sage.
9. Heidegger, M.(1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.).Oxford: Blackwell.
10. Heidegger, M.(1982 a). The basic problems of phenomenology (A. Hofstadter, Trans.).Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
11. Heidegger, M.(1982 b). Nietzsche, Vol. 4: Nihilism. (F.A. Capuzzi, Trans.).San Francisco, CA: HarperCollins.
12. Heidegger, M.(1997). The age of the world picture. In The question concerning technology and other essays (W. Lovitt, Trans.; pp. 115-154).New York: Garland.
13. Husserl, E.(1970). The crisis of the European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (D. Carr, Trans.).Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
14. Levinas, E.(1996).Martin Heidegger and ontology. Diacritics, 26,11-32.
15. McHoul, A.(1998).How can ethnomethodology be Heideggerian? Human Studies, 21,13-26.
16. McHoul, A., &Rapley, M.(2000).Sacks and clinical psychology. Clinical Psychology Forum, 142,5-12.
17. McHoul, A., &Rapley, M.(2001).‘Ghost: Do not forget; this visitation / Is but to whet thy almost blunted purpose’–Culture, psychology and ‘being human’. Culture & Psychology, 7,433-451.
18. McHoul, A., &Rapley, M.(2003).What can psychological terms actually do? (Or: if Sigmund calls, tell him it didn’t work.) Journal of Pragmatics 35,507-522.
19. Okrent, M.(1988). Heidegger’s pragmatism: Understanding, being, and the critique of metaphysics.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
20. Potter, J., &Edwards, D.(2003).Rethinking cognition: On Coulter on discourse and mind. Human Studies, 26,165-181.
21. Rorty, R.(1993). Wittgenstein, Heidegger and the reification of language. In C.B. Guignon(Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Heidegger (pp. 337-357).New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Sacks, H.(1972). On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. Gumperz& D. Hymes(Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics (pp. 325-345).New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
23. Sacks, H.(1992). Lectures on conversation (Vol. 1,G. Jefferson, Ed.; E.A Schegloff, Intro.).Oxford: Blackwell.
24. Silverman, D.(1998). Harvey Sacks: Social science and conversation analysis.Cambridge: Polity.
25. Wittgenstein, L.(1958). Philosophical investigations (G.E.M. Anscombe, Trans.).Oxford: Blackwell.