Chainwise paired comparisons

Decision Sciences

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 581-599

  Ra, Jang W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE   (United States)

Author keywords

AHP; And multicriteria decision making; Measure of consistency

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033472022     PISSN: 00117315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01623.x     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Bazilai, J., Cook, W. D., & Golany, B. (1987). Consistent weights for judgment matrices of the relative importance of alternatives. Operations Research Letter, 6(3), 131-134.
2. Carmone, F. J., Kara, A., & Zanakis, H. (1997). A Monte Carlo investigation of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 102(3), 538-553.
3. Dyer, J. S. (1990). A clarification of 'Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process.' Management Science, 36(3), 274-275.
4. Harker, P. T. (1987a). Alternative modes of questioning in the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical Modeling, 9(3-5), 353-360.
5. Harker, P. T. (1987b). Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical Modeling, 9(11), 837-848.
6. Harker, P. T., & Vargas, L. G. (1987). The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty's analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 33(11), 1383-1403.
7. Lootsma, F. A. (1996). A model for the relative importance of the criteria in the multiplicative AHP and SMART. European Journal of Operational Research, 94(3), 467-476.
8. Ra, J. W. (1991). Hierarchical decision process. Proceedings of Portland International Conference on Engineering and Technology, Portland, Oregon, 595-599.
9. Ra, J. W. (1994). Chainwise paired comparisons-A short version of pairwise comparisons. Proceedings of the First International IEMS Conference, Cocoa Beach, Florida, 381-386.
10. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11. Saaty, T. L. (1990). An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper 'Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process.' Management Science, 36(3), 259-268.
12. Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (1984). Comparison of eigenvalue, logarithmic least squares and least squares methods in estimating ratios. Mathematical Modelling, 5(5), 309-324.
13. Sun, S., Hoffman, D., & Newton, C. (1996). A bibliography of analytic hierarchy process. Technical report. The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
14. Triantaphyllou, E., Lootsma, F. A., Pardalos, P. M., & Mann, S. H. (1994). On the evaluation and application of different scales for quantifying pairwise comparisons in fuzzy sets. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 26(3), 133-155.
15. Zanakis, S., Mandakovic, T., Gupta, S., Sahay, S., & Hong, S. (1995). A review of program evaluation and fund allocation methods within the service and government sectors. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 29(1), 59-79.