Long-term outcome of patients after aneurysmal SAH;Devenir à long terme des patients après une HSA anévrismale

Annales Francaises d'Anesthesie et de Reanimation

Volumn 26, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 959-964

  Fauvage, B ^a   Canet, C ^a   Coppo, F ^a   Jacquot, C ^a   Payen, J F ^a  

^a GRENOBLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Cerebral aneurysm; Outcome assessment; Subarachnoid haemorrhage

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN ARTERY ANEURYSM; BRAIN ARTERY ANEURYSM RUPTURE; COGNITION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; GLASGOW OUTCOME SCALE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CODING; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANKIN SCALE; RATING SCALE; SELF EVALUATION; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; AFFECT; ANEURYSM RUPTURE; ANXIETY; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MEMORY DISORDER; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AFFECT; ANEURYSM, RUPTURED; ANXIETY; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MEMORY DISORDERS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 36248947300     PISSN: 07507658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.annfar.2007.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Jennett B., Snoek J., Bond M.R., and Brooks N. Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 44 (1981) 285-293
2. van der Schaaf I.C., Ruigrok Y.M., Rinkel G.J., Algra A., and van Gijn J. Study design and outcome measures in studies on aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 33 (2002) 2043-2046
3. Kim D.H., Haney C.L., and Van Ginhoven G. Utility of outcome measures after treatment for intracranial aneurysms: a prospective trial involving 520 patients. Stroke 36 (2005) 792-796
4. Fayol P., Carriere H., Habonimana D., Preux P.M., and Dumond J.J. Version française de l'entretien structuré pour l'échelle de devenir de Glasgow (GOS) : recommandations et premières études de validation. Ann. Readapt. Med. Phys. 47 (2004) 142-156
5. Maas A.I., Braakman R., Schouten H.J., Minderhoud J.M., and van Zomeren A.H. Agreement between physicians on assessment of outcome following severe head injury. J. Neurosurg. 58 (1983) 321-325
6. Bonita R., and Beaglehole R. Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke 19 (1988) 1497-1500
7. Molyneux A.J., Kerr R.S., Yu L.M., Clarke M., Sneade M., Yarnold J.A., et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 366 (2005) 809-817
8. Carstairs S.D., Tanen D.A., Duncan T.D., Nordling O.B., Wanebo J.E., Paluska T.R., et al. Computed tomographic angiography for the evaluation of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Acad. Emerg. Med. 13 (2006) 486-492
9. Rappaport M., Hall K.M., Hopkins K., Belleza T., and Cope D.N. Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: coma to community. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 63 (1982) 118-123
10. Linacre J.M., Heinemann A.W., Wright B.D., Granger C.V., and Hamilton B.B. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 75 (1994) 127-132
11. Mahoney F.I., and Barthel D.W. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md. State Med. J. 14 (1965) 61-65
12. Roberts L., and Counsell C. Assessment of clinical outcomes in acute stroke trials. Stroke 29 (1998) 986-991
13. Storey P.B. Psychiatric sequelae of subarachnoid haemorrhage. BMJ 3 (1967) 261-266
14. Hutter B.O., and Gilsbach J.M. Which neuropsychological deficits are hidden behind a good outcome (Glasgow = I) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?. Neurosurgery 33 (1993) 999-1005
15. Carter B.S., Buckley D., Ferraro R., Rordorf G., and Ogilvy C.S. Factors associated with reintegration to normal living after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 46 (2000) 1326-1333
16. Buchanan K.M., Elias L.J., and Goplen G.B. Differing perspectives on outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage: the patient, the relative, the neurosurgeon. Neurosurgery 46 (2000) 831-838
17. Powell J., Kitchen N., Heslin J., and Greenwood R. Psychosocial outcomes at three and nine months after good neurological recovery from aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: predictors and prognosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 72 (2002) 772-781
18. Egge A., Waterloo K., Sjoholm H., Ingebrigtsen T., Forsdahl S., Jacobsen E.A., et al. Outcome 1 year after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: relation between cognitive performance and neuroimaging. Acta Neurol. Scand. 112 (2005) 76-80
19. Powell J., Kitchen N., Heslin J., and Greenwood R. Psychosocial outcomes at 18 months after good neurological recovery from aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 75 (2004) 1119-1124
20. Neil-Dwyer G., Lang D., Smith P., and Iannotti F. Outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: the use of a graphical model in the assessment of risk factors. Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 140 (1998) 1019-1027
21. Takagi K., Tamura A., Nakagomi T., Nakayama H., Gotoh O., Kawai K., et al. How should a subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scale be determined? A combinatorial approach based solely on the Glasgow Coma Scale. J. Neurosurg. 90 (1999) 680-687
22. Roos Y.B., de Haan R.J., Beenen L.F., Groen R.J., Albrecht K.W., and Vermeulen M. Complications and outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a prospective hospital based cohort study in the Netherlands. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 68 (2000) 337-341
23. Hackett M.L., and Anderson C.S. Health outcomes 1 year after subarachnoid hemorrhage: An international population-based study. The Australian Cooperative Research on Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Study Group. Neurology 55 (2000) 658-662
24. Ogden J.A., Mee E.W., and Henning M. A prospective study of impairment of cognition and memory and recovery after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 33 (1993) 572-586
25. Hadjivassiliou M., Tooth C.L., Romanowski C.A., Byrne J., Battersby R.D., Oxbury S., et al. Aneurysmal SAH: cognitive outcome and structural damage after clipping or coiling. Neurology 56 (2001) 1672-1677
26. Ogden J.A., Utley T., and Mee E.W. Neurological and psychosocial outcome 4 to 7 years after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 41 (1997) 25-34
27. Svensson E., Starmark J.E., Ekholm S., von Essen C., and Johansson A. Analysis of interobserver disagreement in the assessment of subarachnoid blood and acute hydrocephalus on CT scans. Neurol. Res. 18 (1996) 487-494
28. van Straten A., de Haan R.J., Limburg M., and van den Bos G.A. Clinical meaning of the Stroke-Adapted Sickness Impact Profile-30 and the Sickness Impact Profile-136. Stroke 31 (2000) 2610-2615
29. King Jr. J.T., Horowitz M.B., Kassam A.B., Yonas H., and Roberts M.S. The short form-12 and the measurement of health status in patients with cerebral aneurysms: performance, validity, and reliability. J. Neurosurg. 102 (2005) 489-494
30. Brott T., Adams Jr. H.P., Olinger C.P., Marler J.R., Barsan W.G., Biller J., et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 20 (1989) 864-870
31. Folstein M.F., Folstein S.E., and McHugh P.R. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J. Psychiatr. Res. 12 (1975) 189-198
32. Ware Jr. J.E., and Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med. Care 30 (1992) 473-483
33. Ware Jr. J., Kosinski M., and Keller S.D. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med. Care 34 (1996) 220-233