Differing perspectives on outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage: The patient, the relative, the neurosurgeon

Neurosurgery

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 831-840

  Buchanan, Karin M ^a   Elias, Lorin J ^b   Goplen, Gary B ^a  

^a ROYAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Family burden; Neurobehavioral changes; Psychological distress; Subarachnoid hemorrhage outcome; Surgical outcome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DISABILITY; DISTRESS SYNDROME; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; PATIENT; PERCEPTION; PERSONALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; RELATIVE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; SURGEON; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0034117063     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006123-200004000-00012     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bornstein RA, Weir BK, Petruk KC, Disney LB: Neuropsychological function in patients after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 21:651-654, 1987.
2. Brooks DN: The head-injured family. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 13:155-188, 1991.
3. Brooks DN, McKinlay W: Personality and behavioural change after severe blunt head injury: A relative's view. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 46:336-344, 1983.
4. Clinchot DM, Kaplan P, Murray DM, Pease WS: Cerebral aneurysms and arteriovenous malformations: Implications for rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75:1342-1351, 1994.
5. Derogatis LR, Melisaratos N: The Brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report. Psychol Med 13:595-605, 1983.
6. Derogatis LR, Spencer PM: The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI): Administration and Procedures Manual - 1. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Clinical Psychometric Research Unit, 1982.
7. Deruty R, Patet JD, Mottolese C, Portilla F: Long-term outcome of the management of ruptured intracranial aneurysm: Review of 328 consecutive patients treated over a period of 12 years. Neurol Res 10:217-220, 1988.
8. Dombovy ML, Drew-Cates J, Serdans R: Recovery and rehabilitation following subarachnoid haemorrhage: Part II - Long-term follow-up. Brain Inj 12:887-894, 1998.
9. Dywan J, Segalowitz SJ: Self-and family ratings of adaptive behavior after traumatic brain injury: Psychometric scores and frontally generated ERPs. J Head Trauma Rehabil 11:79-95, 1996.
10. Friss LR, Whitlach CJ: Who's taking care? A statewide study of family caregivers. Am J Alzheimers Care Related Disord Res September/October:16-26, 1991.
11. Gillen R, Tennen H, Affleck G, Steinpreis R: Distress, depressive symptoms, and depressive disorder among caregivers of patients with brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 13:31-43, 1998.
12. Gold DP, Reis MF, Markiewicz D, Andres D: When home care-giving ends: A longitudinal study of outcomes for caregivers of relatives with dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 43:10-16, 1995.
13. Hadjistavropoulos T, Taylor S, Tuokko H, Beattie BL: Neuropsychological deficits, caregivers' perception of deficits and caregiver burden. J Am Geriatr Soc 42:308-314, 1994.
14. Hunt WE, Hess RM: Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 28:14-20, 1968.
15. Hutter BO, Gilsbach JM: Which neuropsychological deficits are hidden behind a good outcome (Glasgow = I) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage? Neurosurgery 33:999-1006, 1993.
16. Hutter BO, Gilsbach JM, Kreitschmann I: Quality of life and cognitive deficits after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Br J Neurosurg 9:465-475, 1995.
17. Jennett B, Bond M: Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1:480-484, 1975.
18. Knight RG, Devereux R, Godfrey HP: Caring for a family member with a traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 12:467-181, 1998.
19. Lezak M: Neuropsychohgical Assessment. New York, Oxford University Press, 1995, ed 3.
20. Lindberg M, Angquist KA, Fodstad H, Fugl-Meyer K, Fugl-Meyer AR: Self-reported prevalence of disability after subarachnoid haemorrhage, with special emphasis on return to leisure and work. Br J Neurosurg 6:297-304, 1992.
21. Liss M, Willer B: Traumatic brain injury and marital relationships: A literature review. Int J Rehabil Res 13:309-320, 1990.
22. Mahalick DM, Ruff RM, U HS: Neuropsychological sequelae of arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 29:351-357, 1991.
23. Marsh NV, Kersel DA, Havill JH, Sleigh J: Caregiver burden at 6 months following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 12:225-238, 1998.
24. Maurice-Williams RS, Willison JR, Hatfield R: The cognitive and psychological sequelae of uncomplicated aneurysm surgery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 54:335-340, 1991.
25. McKenna P, Willison JR, Phil B, Lowe D, Neil-Dwyer G: Cognitive outcome and quality of life one year after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Neurosurgery 24:361-367, 1989.
26. McKinlay WW, Brooks DN: Methodological problems in assessing psychosocial recovery following severe head injury. J Clin Neuropsychol 6:87-99, 1984.
27. McKinlay WW, Brooks DN, Bond MR, Martinage DP, Marshall MM: The short-term outcome of severe blunt head injury as reported by relatives of the injured persons. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 44:527-533, 1981.
28. Montgomery GK: A multi-factor account of disability after brain injury: Implications for neuropsychological counselling. Brain Inj 9:453-469, 1995.
29. Ogden JA, Levin PL, Mee EW: Long-term neuropsychological and psychosocial effects of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neuropsychiatr Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 3:260-274, 1990.
30. Ogden JA, Mee EW, Henning M: A prospective study of impairment of cognition and memory and recovery after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 33:572-587, 1993.
31. Ogden JA, Utley T, Mee EW: Neurological and psychosocial outcome 4 to 7 years after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 41:25-34, 1997.
32. Olver JH, Ponsford JL, Curran CA: Outcome following traumatic brain injury: A comparison between 2 and 5 years after injury. Brain Inj 10:841-848, 1996.
33. Prigatano GP, Altman IM: Impaired awareness of behavioral limitations after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 71:1058-1064, 1990.
34. Richardson JT: Cognitive performance following rupture and repair of intracranial aneurysm. Acta Neurol Scand 83:110-122, 1991.
35. Såveland H, Hillman J, Brandt L, Edner G, Jakobsson KE, Algers G: Overall outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A prospective study from neurosurgical units in Sweden during a 1-year period. J Neurosurg 76:729-734, 1992.
36. Sbordone RJ, Seyranian GD, Ruff RM: Are the subjective complaints of traumatically brain injured patients reliable? Brain Inj 12:505-515, 1998.
37. Serio CD, Kreutzer JS, Gervasio AH: Predicting family needs after brain injury: Implications for intervention. J Head Trauma Rehabil 10:32-45, 1995.
38. Storey PB: Psychiatric sequelae of subarachnoid haemorrhage. Br Med J 3:261-266, 1967.
39. Tidswell P, Dias PS, Sagar HJ, Mayes AR, Battersby RD: Cognitive outcome after aneurysm rupture: Relationship to aneurysm site and perioperative complications. Neurology 45:875-882, 1995.
40. Vilkki J, Holst P, Ohman J, Servo A, Heiskanen O: Social outcome related to cognitive performance and computed tomographic findings after surgery for a ruptured intracranial aneurysm. Neurosurgery 26:579-585, 1990.
41. Whitlach CJ, Zarit SH, von Eye A: Efficacy of interventions with caregivers: A reanalysis. Gerontologist 31:9-14, 1991.
42. Zarit RH, Orr NK, Zarit JM: The Hidden Victims of Alzheimer's Disease. New York, New York University Press, 1985.